WRITE DOWN🆚WRITE OFF
The atty also requested "writing down the LP of the SPS to 0". Not only he didn't add that there must be a tax-exempt profit (Core Capital),but also he uses write down, used for an asset price reduction, but when it's reduced to...#Fanniegate @TheJusticeDept Image
zero, it's called "write-off",since there are no more incremental write-downs and it involves a credit to a profit acct.
Even a write down involves a profit, because SPS are obligations of FnF(debentures)
In this world,if you are pardoned debt,it's a profit for you.
The same they
are illegally increased (unique=ISSUED separately each time), he wants to simply reduce the price to zero and evade to record any profit (Core Capital)
The more Capital needs, the more stock offerings for the hedge funds and assault on the ownership.
@WhiteHouse @SEC_Enforcement
Credit to a profit account if the asset class is a Debenture, which is our case.
Debit to an expense account (loss) if it's an Asset of the company.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Conservatives against Trump

Conservatives against Trump Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CarlosVignote

Jun 9
SECRET PLAN (THE LAW)
A $301B div (Core Capital) was used to repay the SPS and Recap, under the exceptions to the Restr on Capital Distr. SPS for free, a joke.
Unwound:
-SPS canceled
-$178B UST net refund
Both tax-exempt profit (C.C.)
-Warrant canceled.#Fanniegate @TheJusticeDept ImageImageImage
Once FnF meet the threshold to resume the div payment,the cumulative div on the SPS repaid in 2013/2014, for FMCC/FNMA, resp.,is assessed 0%. Each "purchase" carried its own IRR. 0% due to the illegal collateral W (barred in Fee Limitation),security to (iii) protect the taxpayer.
UST hasn't purchased 1 security of FnF. It got the initial $1B SPS and Warrant for free and then,everything is INCREASED(fraud)
The initial gifts were illegal in the Charter +barred in the FHFA-C's power (C.C. reduction)
The W additionally credited to Additional Paid-In C.(fraud) Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 22
THE ARTICLE ADVOCATES FOR KEEPING THE CHARTER
FnF arent't liquidity providers.That's the #Fed.FnF buy mortgages for a guaranty mortgage securitization biz.
Cross-subsidy:even the authors claim that it's a common feature among insurers."Now,considerably less".This is...#Fanniegate
because they realized that all the borrowers authorized in the Charter pose similar risk at origination, since the Charter's requirement is just LTV<80%.
They claim that the UST backup in the Charter,to "ensure their solvency", is a taxpayer subsidy, ignoring that the true backup
of FnF is their Capital Reserve ($252b as of Dec 2021 w/ the secret plan),as 4th layer of protection. The other 3 are:
-The Charter's Credit Enhancement clause: borrower bears losses(max 80%LTV: PMI or down payment),...
-Collateral
-Loan Loss Reserve
So,the
Read 8 tweets
Sep 7, 2021
THE CFOs' ILLEGAL ACCOUNTING MANEUVERS WITH THE SPS INCREASED FOR FREE (COUNT 3 & 4)
FnF report Comprehensive Income, not just Net Income.
What FnF do:
Not an expense result of operations
A change in Equity from nonowner sources
Distribution to a Preferred Stockholder.#Fanniegate
This is why FnF don't include it in Other Comprehensive Income for the Total Comprehensive Income,but outside the Comprehensive Income, as a distribution of income, like occurs with a cash dividend to the JPS/SPS holders.
This is misleading because the ending result is Net Income
attributable to shareholders, but it's also known as Net Income distributable to shareholders. By considering it like a cash div, there's no income left for distribution, when that's untrue. SPS increased for free means that there's no cash wire,so the Net Income is available for
Read 10 tweets
Sep 5, 2021
🇺🇸CONGRESS TO COMPEL THE @USTreasury/@WhiteHouse TO IMPOSE A GLOBAL RULE W/ REGARD TO M2 MONEY SUPPLY
We witness how Wall St and the #G20 Allies,tailor self-promotion schemes for #PresidentBiden:EV and #coronavirus,resp.The latter hinders this rule.
A TOTALITARIAN COMMUNIST RULER ImageImageImage
Later,he just has to tap debt and,illegally, FnF, to pay for this scheme of economic devastation.
This rule is about accumulation of forex reserves through:
-Capital inflows
-External debt
-Exports/tourism
The more forex reserves, the more money is printed out by the Ctl Banks... Image
for circulation throughout the economy, at a ratio dollar-for-dollar increase.
The bondholders make sure that the Govts aren't reckless, otherwise it increases the prospects of default on the payments. So, the bondholders are the regulators of the politicians and not like today,
Read 6 tweets
Jul 2, 2021
ALITO GOT IT WRONG CALLING THE 6TH AMNT "4TH"
SPS issued for free:
Initial $3b
SPS increased for free:
Dec2017,4th amnt: $3b in 1Q2018.NW=$3b,the rest swept to UST.
Sept2019,5th amnt:max NW=$20b/$25b,resp.
Jan2021,6th amnd:NW increases until Capital requirement is met.#Fanniegate
We see in the screenshots that the maximum amount of Net Worth they are allowed to hold, it's called Applicable Capital Reserve, like in the 3rd amndt.
But now, it isn't Capital Reserve as SPS for free reduce the Core Capital.
So,NW increase=SPS, not Capital.
NWS with other name.
Also,we see that the Jan 2021, 6th amndt to PA, isn't exceptional. The maximum Net Worth is increased, like in the 4th and 5th amendments.
Alito passed it off as a game changer that "eliminated the (Equity holders') injuries."
🚨JPS holders aren't FnF shareholders.@TheJusticeDept
Read 7 tweets
Jun 27, 2021
INC POWER: IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF FHFA-C,NOT @FHFA
"Authorized by this section". It should've been Act,like FDI Act.Drafted by Calabria?
Power: S&S condition. FHFA chose solvent 1st(reduce SPS)instead of soundness(1st,Recap until Undercap for release,then reduce SPS)#Fanniegate ImageImageImageImage
Other examples of this Inc Power:
-The best interests of FnF is recapitalization(earnings),but FHFA chose a prudent stance forcing them to over-reserve for future losses(more than 2x the actual credit loss through 2011),increasing the losses(SPS)
-Selling off loans to reduce risk Image
Multiple examples of what a conservator can do,instead of focusing on earnings.What also is behind the word "may".But once FnF post earnings (C. Capital),it's kept for Recap.
Scotus interpreted it w/ "in the best interests of the Agency and,by extension,the public it serves".Sick
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(