The Knesset Parliamentary Group for Ending the Occupation, led by MKs @AidaTuma and @mossi_raz, is holding its first meeting today - marking 55 years of military rule over the oPt.
We're livetweeting from the Knesset. Join us >
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz MK @AidaTuma starts off:
Once, the occupation was considered to be temporary. Today it appears that many around the world have gotten used to the horrors of occupation and siege. In order to perpetuate it and turn it into a done deal, Israel is operating an Apartheid regime.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz > Even the horrific pictures from Shireen Abu Akleh's funeral a few weeks ago didn't make people think about what's going on here. It immediately turned into a debate about who went into the hospital when. Why is it so difficult to say that there's a moral problem here?
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz MK @mossi_raz: occupation is a situation in which a foreign military rules over a civilian population. This situation leads to human rights abuses, resistance, violence and counter-violence.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz Occupation is the child who can't fall asleep for fear that soldiers will burst in to make an arrest. Occupation is the restriction of individual rights, of the right to movement and so on. And that's why we have to bring this situation to an end.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz Our own @origivati speaks about 'Blue Wolf', the facial recognition technology used by soldiers to take pictures of random Palestinians to enter them into a database. The units serving in the oPt are made to compete for prizes to take as many pictures as possible.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati Ori says that his commander told him, when he was serving as a tank commander in the oPt, that the point of their presence their was to make sure the Palestinians "wouldn't be able to lift their heads." By making the Palestinians constantly feel the IDF's presence, the logic is >
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati that they will be afraid to do anything at all that could raise the IDF's suspicion. That's how Palestinians have been living their lives for 55 years now. And it's all in order to further entrench the occupation. That's why we work to expose this reality and bring it to an end.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati Next up: Yahel Gazit, an Israeli volunteer with #SaveMasaferYatta who lives w/ the Palestinian residents of Masafer Yatta as part of a solidarity project. She wrote her speech together with @Ali_awad1998, a local activist who's fighting to save his community from mass eviction. >
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati@Ali_awad1998 She says: The Supreme Court of Israel ruled to evict 1,300+ residents from the area. I sit here today and wonder if there's anyone at all who believes that this move is really about creating a military training zone, when right next door settlements are built without any problems
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati@Ali_awad1998 Yahel continues: we're about to turn 1300 people into refugees. Why doesn't this bother anyone? Why can't we let these simple people just tend to their sheep? To live with some self-respect? Let's not repeat the Nakba in 2022.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati@Ali_awad1998@lizzadwoskin@washingtonpost@YeshDin These outposts are normally inhabited by a single couple or family, are not given permits by the State to be there, yet the State supports their existence de facto by letting them stay there and giving them access to funding, infrastructure and military protection.
@AidaTuma@mossi_raz@origivati@Ali_awad1998@lizzadwoskin@washingtonpost@YeshDin E.g. Shabtai from Havat Avraham in the S Hebron Hills states openly that he controls 9000 dunams, 6x more than he was given. "Wherever we set foot w/ our sheep is ours." Yesh Din documented several violent attacks by settlers from this outpost. This model exists all over the oPt.
When a Palestinian attacks a soldier, consequences are usually quick and overwhelming. They could be shot, or arrested. The IDF could demolish their home, blockade their village, arrest their family members.
So what happens when a settler does the same? 🧵
Over the weekend, dozens of settlers attacked the IDF's Central Command chief and other soldiers in Hebron, while others threw rocks at an IDF force near Nablus, punching one soldier in the face. Only a few assailants were arrested - but the vast majority of them walked free.
A week prior, a soldier was hospitalized after settlers threw a glass bottle at his face, while protesting demolitions in an outpost. In response, far-right MK Tzvi Sukkot said settler violence doesn’t count as terror, while defending a new law to deport terrorists’ families.
The US deadline to improve humanitarian conditions in northern Gaza has expired, and the IDF's mass bombing and starvation campaign to expel its residents has worsened. The IDF clearly stated - residents won’t be allowed to return
In other words: ethnically cleansing the area 🧵
After the IDF already split Gaza in two with an ever expanding Netzarim corridor (named after a settlement evicted from Gaza in 2005), it built another corridor in the north, cutting Gaza City off from Jabalya, Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahia. A siege within a siege within a siege.
In October the IDF drastically decreased the amount of aid entering northern Gaza, publicly stating none would enter north of Gaza City for over a month. Attempting to justify this to the public, the IDF claimed there were no civilians in the area - a blatant and abhorrent lie.
"You went into Gaza for revenge. As much as possible. Women, children, anyone in sight."
The funeral which sent shockwaves through social media, the jarring quotes that nearly all major Israeli news outlets chose to omit, and what they say about the IDF’s policies on the ground🧵
A recap: IDF reservist Shuvael Ben Natan was killed in Lebanon last week. During his funeral, his brother said he entered Gaza to take revenge on women and children. A fellow soldier said he became the platoon's "jokester" when he torched a house without approval "for the vibes."
These more damning descriptions of Ben Natan oddly didn't make it onto the many Israeli news sites which reported on said funeral. According to @the7i, most Israeli sites which reported on it chose to cut these parts out. One outlet even edited them out of the video completely.
About 100 people were killed on Monday in an IDF strike on Beit Lahia in northern Gaza. The IDF said the building was bombed after 4 soldiers were killed by an IED nearby, and a “lookout” was detected on its roof. A 5-story building, around 200 people - bombed for a “lookout” 🧵
About 20 of those who died in the bombing were children. Dozens were trapped under the rubble, some of whom were taking shelter after being driven out of the bombed areas of Jabaliya and Beit Hanoun. For a lookout. But what does the IDF mean when they say someone is a “lookout”?
A soldier who took part in the 2014 ground invasion of Gaza, told us how two women in an orchard were targeted and killed for allegedly being "lookouts," because they were seen "with cellphones, talking, walking" and it was assumed that they could see the forces.
Yesterday, as thousands were fleeing from northern Gaza under threat of starvation and bombing in what is in all likelihood an implementation of the "Generals' Plan," Netanyahu's Likud Party held a "Gaza resettlement conference" nearby, overlooking the charred houses of Be'eri 🧵
The conference area was designated a “restricted military zone,” and protesters against it, many of whom are the still-displaced residents of Be’eri and families of hostages, were blocked from entering. They want a ceasefire and a hostage deal - that’s why they were pushed aside.
A month ago, Netanyahu said he was considering the Generals’ Plan. A week ago he said the same thing. Between those two statements, were multiple weeks of no food entering northern Gaza, coupled with mass bombings. Now, his party hosts a conference to say out loud what he won’t.
This weekend, the IDF bombed a hospital in Jabalya and a residential complex in Beit Lahia, killing at least 120 in those two strikes alone, including many women and children.
But again, they utter the magic words “precise munitions,” trying to justify another mass killing 🧵
Unsurprisingly though, the dead don’t seem to care how “precise” the weapons were. And while the army may have considered them “acceptable collateral damage,” basic moral norms say otherwise. Especially when the list of “acceptable” targets includes humanitarian safe zones.
For example, let's say the IDF fires a precision missile precisely into the Al-Tabaeen school that houses masses of displaced Gazans, like it did in early August. Was a disaster of over 90 deaths, including children, avoided? No.