Thread by @S_Coughlin_DC

1) I'm feeling my way to a better way to explan. I think the true scientific value of the soft-sciences, which increasingly fail falsifiability - way past 50% - is outweighed by the fact that they're not tethered to science but rather to what Hegel calls the Science of Reason.

https://twitter.com/floraoddchild/status/1534410511286140928

2) And that this "Science of Reason" is a libido dominandi formula (learn the term) that seeks to dominate target audiences through purported higher-level thinking as demonstrated by the higher level scientized lexicon in support of dominance narratives.

3) As such, as a practical example, this tactic under the larger claim of science is used to attack speech and silence dissent. Simply visualize the fat slob masters seeking TA in a soft science 001 class using this LOE to assert illegitimate authority over unsuspecting students.

4) "What is your authority" (to voice your opinion)? i.e., What right do you have to your opinion? Being "unscientific," the poor student, or larger citizen audiences, can now be disrespectfully treated and viewed as unworthy.

5) Controlling who gets advanced degrees, one controls who become the initiate ruling class that, over time, demand their opinions be treated as science. Being unscientific in their opinions and views, . . .

6) . . . a duty arises from w/in this opaque ruling class to suppress average citizens otherwise protected speech. When such abuses of language breaks the waterline, for ex; political correctness giving way to hate speech, abuse of power supports only speech that is "scientific".

7) Tangentially, I did answer "Doctor Doctor" but he's simply bumping up against his own self-imposed construct - demanding that I conform to it. In that regard, he's very much like the (planted) student challenging Frank Turek, who then dismantles him -

8) Note, constrained by his own construct, the "atheist" student perceives he's being dismantled but can't perceive why. For the discerning audience, however, it's painfully obvious - the student is trapped in his blue pill world and must now decide whether to take the Red Pill.

9) BTW, most will NOT take the Red Pill, i.e., rub so strongly against their self-imposed imprisonment through their adherence to the mass line enforcement narrative. Rather, try to seek to perfect their blue pill construct from w/in the blue pill domain (the pseudoreality).