ChrisO Profile picture
Jun 8 28 tweets 13 min read
1/ News of a possible successful Russian crossing of the Siverskyi Donets river has highlighted the importance of this river as a key frontline. It's not the first time the Donets has had this role. A 🧵 on its significance in this and earlier wars.
2/ The Siverskyi Donets (also known in Russian as the Seversky Donets or just the Donets) is one of Ukraine's longest rivers, at 1,053 km (654 mi) in length. It's the river that gives its name to Donetsk and to the entire Donbas - literally the Donets basin.
3/ In happier times, there were many holiday camps and children's camps along the riverside, with fishing and rafting among the leisure activities on offer. The river was polluted but still had a good reputation for wildlife.
4/ The Siverskyi Donets sits in a wide valley that varies from between 8–10 km (5.0–6.2 mi) in the upper part and as much as 20–26 km (12–16 mi) downstream. It's very meandering, doubling back on itself in some places as it cuts through the chalk plateaus of the Donbas.
5/ The river itself is mostly between 30 and 70 m (98 and 230 ft) wide, sometimes reaching 100–200 m (330–660 ft), and up to 10 m (30 ft) deep, with an average depth of about 2.5 m (8 ft). In other words, it's fordable in theory. The problem is the surrounding terrain.
6/ The right and left banks of the river are highly asymmetrical. Chalk cliffs occupy parts of the right bank, with steep gullies and ravines descending to the river on both banks.
7/ The left bank is flatter and contains many swamps, lakes and oxbows. This makes vehicular access harder. Both banks also have many forested areas, which partially neutralise air power and limit the use of heavy armoured vehicles, as well as making resupply more difficult.
8/ These characteristics have created a number of military difficulties:

- It's hard for vehicles to reach the riverside in many places
- The heights offer defenders major advantages
- Viable crossing points are relatively few
9/ The Siverskyi Donets has emerged as a key battleground, with the frontline running along a substantial length of the river, roughly between Balakliia in the west and Pryshb in the east, with Russian salients south of Izyum.
10/ The frontline mostly corresponds to the high ground south of the river. This is not a coincidence, as we'll see, but has almost certainly come about due to the terrain of the region.
11/ Both sides have sought to shape the battlefield along the Siverskyi Donets Reportedly, most of the bridges have now been destroyed by the Ukrainians, such as the one at Sviatohirsk in the last few days.
12/ Both sides have also tried to build their own pontoon bridges over the Donets or destroy the other side's, as the Ukrainians famously did to the Russians near Bilohorivka last month. (Though the Russians have also destroyed Ukrainian pontoon bridges.)
13/ Crossing the Siverskyi Donets has been a high priority for Russia as an essential step towards encircling Ukraine's forces in the Donbas. They crossed the river at Izyum in early April but so far haven't been able to advance much further on that axis.
14/ Reports in the last two days suggest that the Russians have crossed the river again near Bohorodychne and Tetyanivka across from Sviatohirsk. This is potentially dangerous for the Ukrainians, though they almost certainly still control the high ground behind the two towns.
15/ For a good analysis of the threat this potentially poses to Ukraine, see this thread by @ZimmermanErik.
16/ The same factor - control of the high ground - likely also means that the loss of Sievierodonetsk wouldn't be nearly as serious as the loss of Lysychansk, which overlooks the river valley from the high ground opposite Sievierodonetsk.
17/ Take a look at these views of Sievierodonetsk from Lysychansk and vice-versa. Where would you rather be - on the exposed flood plain, having to attack uphill through steep wooded gullies, or dug in on the hill 130 m (450 ft) above, firing down on enemies in the open below?
18/ This isn't the first time the Siverskyi Donets has been the scene of fighting. It was a key battleground in World War II as well, when the Soviet and German armies suffered great losses fighting over it. Much of this was due to the difficulties of the terrain.
19/ In particular, the river, ravines and gullies created many natural obstacles. The terrain provided natural cover for anti-tank weapons and the heights enabled gunners to see enemy tanks from great distances. River crossings created vulnerable chokepoints.
20/ The Red Army suffered one of its worst disasters of World War II on the Siverskyi Donets. In January 1942, it successfully pushed the Germans back across the river at Izyum and Volchansk to create a pair of small salients. Between 12–28 May 1942, the Germans counter-attacked.
21/ Operation Fredericus, also called the Second Battle of Kharkov, resulted in three Soviet armies at Izyum being cut off and destroyed. The Soviets lost 280,000 men and 1,250 tanks, against only 20,000 Axis troops and 108 tanks lost.
22/ The following month, the Germans crossed the river easily, routing the demoralised Soviets. They pushed hundreds of kilometers east to the Caucasus - the furthest point reached in their invasion.
23/ The Germans retreated back to the Siverskyi Donets following their defeat at Stalingrad, and by July 1943 the two sides again faced each other across the river. The Soviets, however, planned to go on the offensive.
24/ The Soviets launched an offensive across the Siverskyi Donets on 17 July 1943 but had to abandon it only ten days later, having suffered over 99,760 casualties and the loss of 732 tanks, 522 anti-tank guns, and 197 artillery pieces.
25/ A fresh offensive in August 1943 was much more successful, pushing the Germans back to the Dnieper and Molochna rivers. It caused over 273,000 German casualties. Soviet losses were high too: it took only a week for an average Soviet tank corps to lose 120 of its 200 tanks.
26/ The biggest obstacles they faced were the ravines and gullies of the river valley, as well as the difficulty of crossing the water - exactly the same factors that the Russians now face, and that the Ukrainians will face in any counter-offensives.
27/ It remains to be seen how this Fourth (?) Battle of the Donets will unfold. Assuming the Ukrainians are able to retain control of the high ground, however, the Russians will face formidable difficulties in taking full control of the Siverskyi Donets valley. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChrisO

ChrisO Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisO_wiki

Jun 7
1/ How do you knock out a tank without hitting it directly? This is the question posed by the video below, which shows Russian armoured vehicles being targeted by Ukrainian artillery in the Donbas in early May. A short 🧵 on near misses versus armour.
2/ A direct hit is obviously bad news for a tank. Russian tanks face a high risk of having their turrets launched into orbit. That's a catastrophic kill. But even a near miss can be fatal. Tanks may be tough, but they have a lot that's still breakable.
3/ A shell explosion produces a huge number of red-hot fragments travelling at supersonic speeds. The pics below show an early 20th century naval shell (12" or 304 mm calibre) explosively fragmented into over 7,000 pieces, and fragments from a modern 152 mm high explosive shell.
Read 20 tweets
May 31
1/ Old rations, faulty vehicles, missing radios, under-strength units: corruption has been blamed for hollowing out Russia's military and undermining its war in Ukraine. It's worth examining this problem and seeing how it's affected the Russian armed forces. 1st 🧵 in a series.
2/ Russia is one of the world's most corrupt countries - Transparency International (TI) rates it 136th of 180 countries. State corruption is endemic. TI found that between 2008 and 2020, current and former Russian officials owned 28,000 properties in 85 countries.
3/ It's not just the top brass who cash in. Even if you're only a middle-ranking official in Russia, your life goals are likely to be to set up your family in comfort in western Europe and send your children to a posh British school. Corruption is how you'll achieve that.
Read 41 tweets
May 29
Some more information has emerged on Russia's apparent deployment of 40-year-old T-62M and T-62MV tanks to southern Ukraine. /1
The Zaporizhzhia Regional Administration has confirmed that T-62s have arrived in Melitopol. The regional governor, Oleksandr Starukh, says the Russians intended to use them not as frontline fighting vehicles but as dug-in stationary firing points. /2 t.me/zoda_gov_ua/83…
If so, this would mirror a tactic used by Saddam Hussein's Iraq in which dug-in tanks were used effectively as heavily-armed pillboxes. However, it failed in Iraq due to US air power. Ukrainian drones can cause similar problems for T-62s - the roof armour is only 40 mm thick. /3
Read 8 tweets
May 27
Could Ukraine destroy the longest bridge in Europe - Russia's link to Crimea - and does Joe Biden hold the key to helping it do so? A 🧵 on why this matters, and an exploration of the mechanics of bridge-busting. /1
Bridges have been prime targets since the start of the Ukraine war. Ukraine says more than 300 of its bridges and overpasses have been destroyed since the start of the war. /2
Both sides have been responsible - including Ukraine targeting its own bridges. But why destroy bridges? First, you might want to block enemy movements, as Ukraine did when it blew up a railway bridge connecting it to Russian-occupied Transnistria. /3
Read 40 tweets
May 26
Russian advances in the Donbas are prompting a lot of commentary, including some irrational enthusiasm and gloom. It's worth looking at the bigger picture, as @ian_matveev (follow him!) has done in a thread which I've translated below with his permission.
From @ian_matveev: The Russian army has struck four heavy blows and breached Ukraine's defenses near Popasna. In a short thread, I will try to explain how in my opinion this will affect the war in the near future, and what to expect next.
To begin with, let's take a sober look at the situation. Two of the four strikes were assaults on Liman and Severodonetsk with massive artillery and MLRS support. This is nothing unexpected. These attacks have been prepared for a long time.
Read 32 tweets
May 25
More details have emerged of Russia's deployment of very old T-62 tanks in Ukraine, which I commented on in the thread below. /1
T-62s have been spotted being transported across Russia by train. The models visible are T-62Ms with applique armour and T-62MVs with Kontakt-1 explosive reactive armour. These upgrades date to 1983 and 1985 respectively. @TankDiary /2
According to Ukrainian media, they were transported from the 943rd Mobilization Deployment Support Center in Novoozerne, Crimea, and brought to the occupied southern Ukrainian city of Melitopol in Zaporizhzhia region. /3
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(