One thing that I think about a lot, but rarely get right, is understanding the ultimate "unlock" for a stock. $ASTS is obviously a story stock with myriad events coming over the next six months. What will ultimately be the unlock? Let's think about it and look at some examples
One example I had studied previously was Cheniere ($LNG). For those with memory, $LNG was a disaster for investors prior to 2008 as an import story (and before that, a near-shore seismic company). As it pivoted to export, there was a huge overhang to clear
$LNG had commercial risk (would people buy US LNG), regulatory risk (would FERC allow it), construction risk (could they get an EPC contract), financing risk (can they finance it), and management risk (CEO is a nutjob)
When looking at the progression of $LNG, there was the "MOU Phase" where commercial agreements were signed, but they were not finalized, and where perfunctory licenses and permits were secured (everyone got DOE FTA approvals). Did well, but then had some serious retracement
Next came the SPA phase, which are the Sales & Purchase Agreements. This proved to be the real unlock for $LNG. On October 2011, BG signed a 20-year 3.5mpta deal and the stock went up 200%. This proved to the market that something would happen. In short order, an EPC was done
The next phase I call the Expanded Market Phase. It is here that $LNG expanded from 1 trains at Sabine Pass to many trains across various sites. As the SPA's flowed it, the market rewarded the expanded TAM and the stock just worked and worked and worked
Interestingly, the return from "discounting the TAM" was higher than the "binary idea" risk phase. The initial unlock, though...paid well
$ASTS reminds me a bit of $LNG, although obviously the "will it work" factor is a little more acute when blasting something into space. Looking forward over the next six months, we have the following
Regulatory Risk: Let's simplify this and say it seems obvious the FCC approvals will be relevant to investors, but by the time they are due, SpaceMobile will already be operating and monetizing. This is unlikely to be the unlock. $ASTS already has the experimental license.
Management Risk: Unlike Cheniere, $ASTS does not have the same overhang. Abel seems very good and he's proving the ability to attract talent, as highlighted in my #MeetTheTeam thread
Financing Risk: But the Company continues to be ahead of the curve. For one, they raised $460mm in a SPAC. Now they have the committed equity line. My guess is we have some non-dilutive financing (trade facilities) help too. This is a risk after "it works," not before
Commercial Risk: $LNG announced a ton of MOUs with leading companies, those announcements definitely juiced the stock. The same has not been true for $ASTS, although arguably you could say those MOUs/Deals support the current market cap. Let's call it the latter
Technical Risk: No sh~t this is the big one. How will it be resolved? Clearly when BW-3 does its first phone call, a lot of uncertainty will be resolved, but we have seen the stock react significantly to SpaceX launch news items. Why? How is risk de-risked?
What is obvious to me is that the testing process is a) no joke, b) they literally break it on the ground, and c) once tested, satellites rarely fail. See this analysis for when I dug into this #FudBusters
When $ASTS announces that it's wound up the Jack-In-The-Box, we know the testing is done, including a final attempt to destroy it simulated space conditions. The market might (correctly) treat this as a de-risking event more than it seem obvious at the present time
We will then get a lot of other "technical" events, such as the launch date, launch, unfolding, and first operations, etc. Hard to know which will matter
But then we move onto the BlueBird phase and making sure the company can deliver these at scale. I think this will be like the $TSLA Model 3 factory. Arguably another interval over which investors get paid to own the stock
Finally, we will have the execution phase / cash flow phase. I wouldn't discount the return here. For those who sit out the first phases and see some XXX% return and assume they "missed it," I am pretty sure that will not be the case. The $LNG shows this point in case.
We know that $ASTS has more cards up its sleeve. The TAM is probably much larger than we think, and we probably get government applications - which we already know is the case b/c of $T FirstNet literally on the FCC experimental license application
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Cardinals select a new supreme constellation, FCC filings give us a lot of potential upside surprises, and more on this week's Weekly
🚀Launch Update
The launch guidance tightens up from H2 2025 - 1H 2026.
The story is now for cash flow ramp expectations. The April–May 2025 FCC/NTIA volley shows AST SpaceMobile has cleared the two riskiest technical hurdles—orbital-debris compliance and 36 GHz passive-sensor protection—while quietly quadrupling its target constellation. In short, “36 GHz passive-sensor protection” refers to proving that AST’s Q/V-band feeder links will not wash out sensitive climate-monitoring instruments. The filings show AST achieves this with comfortable technical margin, eliminating a major regulatory uncertainty without sacrificing link budget or launch schedule.
FCC Chair Carr and Senator Ted Cruz drop by to congratulate Abel, Golden Dome kicks off, 5G Fund expectations rise, ISRO Launch soon, and much more on this week's Weekly...
🎌Rakuten Meeting
CEO Hiroshi Mikitani told a briefing Wednesday that Rakuten would provide voice, video, text and "other" services when it starts in the fourth quarter of 2026.
While Japan has dense mobile coverage in built-up areas, its difficult terrain and numerous offshore islands mean most carriers cover only about 70% of the total territory.
Seeing this filing means the operator (through the U.S. administration) has taken an early and essential regulatory step. The ITU framework sets the stage for official recognition of the satellite’s frequency usage and ensures no uncoordinated interference emerges
The world is over, but $ASTS continues to be in control of its destiny with nuanced details in regulatory filings showing that a large base of government revenue appears to be cooking. That, and more, on this week's Weekly...
👶Beta Boys
Beta is back. Wholesale liquidations of the market is always super fun, but it gives you a second chance. A great stock won't ever go back or rewind itself unless a) the market pukes or b) something bad happens.
Analogues:
October 1987 saw an enormous single‑day collapse (“Black Monday”). One month later, the market was roughly flat to slightly down (depending on the exact start/end points). November 2008 saw a vigorous +18 % rebound in the month after the local low, even though the global financial crisis continued well into 2009. March 2020 bottomed on March 23; the rebound one month later was approximately +25 %, reflecting the swift policy response and rapid market snapback.
Son, are we winning? Apparently, but last week it didn't feel like it. Ligado got signed, the future is bright but macro and FUD separate the men from the boys...that, and more on this week's Weekly...
The DA is signed. The implications of this are enormous. ASTS is ever-evolving and capitalizing on opportunities to maximize the value of their innovative technology