COVID-in-wastewater for BC Lower Mainland, to 4-June-2022. 🪡
From bccdc.ca/Health-Info-Si…
Red line at zero level added to emphasize that relatively high levels persist in wastewater, discordant with the low level of officially reported cases. (1/n) #covid19bc
The graph is dominated by the Jan-Dec peak, which effectively and conveniently scales down the current persistent high levels. The eye tends not to catch that the levels post-peak are much higher than the levels before. (2/n)
The description in the text seems determined to ignore these persistent high levels, and appears to focus on shorter-term bumps and noise in order to use the word “decreased”… (3/n)
…which is unfortunate, because recent trends in hospitalizations and deaths make sense when one realizes that the wastewater data reveal a persistent high level of infection.
This high level of infection is not shown by the official case count… (4/n) bccdc.ca/Health-Info-Si…
…the official case count that is based on limited and non-representative official PCR testing.
Official testing (MSP) is shown by the almost-illegible doted lines.
The solid lines are government + private PCR tests. (5/n) bccdc.ca/Health-Info-Si…
This matters because we cannot manage personal/societal risk and resources without clear and timely data on infections.
It would not be difficult or expensive to do ongoing PCR testing on a representative sample, using statistics to extrapolate to the population as a whole. (6/n)
And yet, here we are.
(7/n)
A better COVID wastewater graph from the relentless robot @YVRCovidPlots 🤖should be available tomorrow.
(1/n) I can’t reply directly to this @angie_rasmussen tweet, promoting the famous epicenter preprint, now under peer review.
But I can re-up my critique.
TLDR: preprint gets an F, due to problems with math, cartography, and spatial analysis.
Sorry, nothing about furin cleavage.
(2/n) The main fallacies
▪️Centrality is not causality.
▪️Simplification is not analysis.
▪️The spread of a complex disease in a complex city of 11 million cannot be reduced to a model of diffusion in a homogeneous, isotropic medium. bit.ly/36KRtNX
(3/n) Math error
The centroid (X,Y) of a point cloud in a cartesian coordinate system is (mean of x, mean of y).
Cannot be calculated as (median of x, median of y).
Cannot be calculated from latitude/longitude, which is not cartesian.
(Centroids are a big deal in the preprint.)
So, this is where we are in BC.
▪️COVID still rampant, although we only know that from wastewater measurements @YVRCovidPlots.
▪️16,000 HCWs off sick at least 1 day last week, as per @adriandix.
▪️Doctors and such holding in-person, maskless conferences. @BCPSQC@DoctorsOfBC
Health Minister Dix says in Legislature that 16,000 HCWs were off sick at least 1 day last week.
Unclear whether all BC or just Interior Health.
He says “that’s because of COVID”. Not clear what he meant. leg.bc.ca/documents-data… @PennyDaflos@Protect_BC@VicLeungIDdoc
This was reported in Saanich News (via CP?), but they say the absences were “due to COVID-19”, which is not quite what Dix said.
16,000 absences among BC HCWs in one week sounds crazy, given that there were only 1,358 official cases in all of BC May 15-21. saanichnews.com/news/b-c-start…
It was, apparently, Ice Cream Day in the Legislature.
Hence, the threat from the speaker to withhold ice cream from honourable members who were heckling Minister Dix.
A thread to tie together and build on a series of previous threads, describing the methodological and conceptual errors in the geospatial analysis in the preprint zenodo.org/record/6299600… [V2 of this thread; 1st version was broken after 3rd tweet, just before all the good stuff]
Due to these errors, the preprint does not support its claim of dispositive evidence for emergence of SARS-COV-2 via life wildlife trade, or its claim that the Huanan market is the unambiguous “epicenter” of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Start with the title: “The Huanan market was the epicenter of SARS-CoV-2 emergence”. This reads more like a newspaper headline than the title of a scientific article. Perhaps unintentionally.
This thread discusses significant imprecision and errors in Worobey et al (2022), with respect to locations of residences of cases of COVID in Wuhan in Dec 2019. zenodo.org/record/6299116…