1/ This is going to be one those threads.

I saw this chart a while back and scratched out some rough thoughts...

Around ’10 or ’11, I noticed a significant shift in “the relationship marketplace.” I can sum up this shift with two trends I saw in my church circles...
2/ First, I noticed that many (not all) average to above average Christian men in overall quality (e.g. health, looks, ambition, etc) were struggling to get a girlfriend.

At first, I thought these guys were just being too picky or had some other major deficiency.

After all...
3/ ...there are a lot of lazy foolish men out there. This wasn’t the case with these men.

They weren’t the top 1%. But they were quality and had very reasonable (perhaps too low) standards for a girlfriend.
4/ Second, I noticed that many (not all) average to below average Christian women (I know me suggesting that such a thing exists is upsets a lot you) in overall quality (e.g. beauty, personality, temperament, etc) had a fear of a committed relationship & were extremely picky...
5/ ...They would often complain that there weren’t any good men. But there were good men. They just thought those men were below them. They weren’t. The arrogance and pride of these women was shocking to me at the time. Not anymore.
6/ I ran my concerns past a boomer pastor. He dismissed it. He thought all the women were just great & men needed to step up to win them. Man up & all that. That really was the moment I realized that there was some form of generational blindness related to what is happening...
7/ And that’s why I started tracking trends in sexuality not just generally but specifically as they related to dating (aka the relationship marketplace).

Now let me point out 2 particularly concerning trends that overturn older assumptions about the relationship marketplace...
8/ 1st More & more women today are delaying marriage into their 30s. They, however, aren't delaying sex. Very few of these unmarried women are virgins when they turn 30. Stats vary but it's below 10% and perhaps closer to 5%. Moreover, these women have multiple sexual partners...
9/ It's difficult to calculate the number but a survey of the material points toward between 7-14 sexual partners prior to getting married right around 30. Others say that is a low number. Regardless, the consequences of this are hard to overstate. This sort sexual promiscuity...
10/ ...has intense negative emotional, spiritual, and even physical consequences in the lives of these women.

Also, it means that a large number of these women are using hormonal birth control and having abortions.

Why are women doing this? I think it is...
11/ ...tied directly to social media which normalizes deviant behavior & promotes vanity in women. I'm speaking in generalities. But I think this is what is basically going on.

This is deeper into the church than most realize...even reformed home-school sort of churches.
12/ Whenever I point out the disturbing trend of widespread female promiscuity, someone chimes in "Well, sex takes two."

True but that doesn't mean what you think it means…
13/ 2nd As you see in the chart above, male virginity between ages 18-30 has increased 20% since '89. That's good, right? No. It's doubtful that this increase in virginity is directly connected to an increase in morality among men.

I think that there are a few things driving it.
14/ First, I think a lot of guys have "failed to launch" due to absent fathers and digital substitutes of the objects of male desire (e.g. video games instead of vocation, porn instead of actual sex, etc). The are low ambition and therefore seen as a "low" value option.
15/ Second, I think many men don't live up to the ridiculous standards of younger modern women.

They enter the relationship marketplace, buy a bunch of girls a bunch of meals, get nowhere, lose heart, give up, & go back to porn & games.

So who are these women having sex with?
16/ There appears to be men who are consider "top tier guys" by women who are having a lot casual sex with a lot of women. Supposedly, 20% of the men are having 80% of the sex.

Messed up, I know. Again, I'm speaking in generalities but I think this is what is basically going on.
17/ This is terrible for society. The key driver to building and protecting a free society is having a familial stake in it.

Let me be clear, I'm not saying that these trends are equally present in Christian circles but they are bleeding over at a disturbing rate.
18/ What is a Christian parent to do?

Here are a few things to consider...

- Keep your children off social media as long as possible, especially your daughters.

- Delay getting your children cell phones as long as possible. We use Gabb Wireless' app-less smartphone. Google it.
19/ - Get your children involved in real world skill building activities (e.g. sports, 4H, job) as soon as possible. This goes double for your sons. Keep them busy & it'll naturally decrease the time available & desire for gaming. Video games in moderation are fine.
20/ - Network with other solid Christian families & communities. 58% of people meet their spouse through the network of friends. I don’t think this means formalized family camps, etc. I think more of informal casual “networks.” Normal, natural, organic are good descriptors here.
21/ - Build a love for family and legacy in your kids through words and action. Give them an example and model to aspire towards.

I don't have a silver bullet for every situation. These are merely steps and suggestions. It's a bumpy road we're driving down.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Foster

Michael Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thisisfoster

Jun 8
1/ I’ve found that an understanding of the Cultural Mandate’s relationship to the Great Commission and vice versa allows Christians to avoid two common ditches:

the social gospel and a type of gnostic gospel.
2/ The social gospel is where the Lordship of Jesus Christ becomes secondary to some cause (e.g. abolish abortion, eliminate poverty, etc).

This comes in conservative and liberal varieties.
3/ The gnostic gospel, as I’m using it here, is where the Lordship of Jesus Christ is limited to “spiritual things” and is rarely applied to life outside the walls of the church.

This too comes in conservative and liberal varieties.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 7
1/ "The Living Years" just popped up on my Spotify channel. It was one of my little brother's favorite songs. He didn't post much on Facebook but it is one his last posts. It is about a difficult father-son relationship.

Here are few lines... Image
2/ "Say it loud, say it clear
You can listen as well as you hear
It's too late when we die
To admit we don't see eye to eye

I wasn't there that morning
When my Father passed away
I didn't get to tell him
All the things I had to say"

I've listened to 50+ times since Wayne died.
3/ I'm glad that I told him everything I needed to tell him prior to his death. There was more say but the main things were said.

It wouldn't been like that had it been a decade earlier. God, in His kindness, has sent a number of unexpected tragedies my way. They taught me...
Read 5 tweets
May 23
1/ Do I think that there is a war on white people?

Kind of.

I just don’t think it is what some people think it is.

There can be no question that there is a deep animus aimed towards “whites”* in most forms of popular media.
2/ There is a constant attempt to depict “whites”as hateful selfish oppressors against “non-whites.”

And with this there are implicit and explicit calls to lessen or even eradicate the white population.

Yet I only say “there kind of is a war on whites.”

Why?
3/ Because I don’t think the main motivation behind it isn’t primarily racial. I think the goal is to stirrup racial tensions and particularly bait lower class whites into certain activities/attitudes.

But again why?

To camouflage their real motive and goal…
Read 7 tweets
May 10
1/ The power of fathers is undeniable...well to some.

But for you reasonable souls...

In Life Without Father, Dr. David Popenoe writes, “Involved fathers—especially biological fathers—bring positive benefits to their children that no other person is as likely to bring.”
2/ Research continues to pile up proving this; 82% of father-involvement studies since 1980 have found “significant associations between positive father involvement and offspring well-being.”

Children with strong, active fathers do better. This shows up in surprising ways...
3/ For ex, there is evidence that a father’s overall fitness (not the mother’s) is the best indicator of a child’s future physical health.

We see similar correlation in the areas of educational performance, vocabulary, & spirituality.

Even long before scientific studies...
Read 5 tweets
May 9
A Massive Thread on The Problem of Associative Thinking in Social Conversations

Associative thinking is something common to all to a degree. This is where you make connections based on associations and not their direct linear relevance to the issue of hand...
2/ For example, you are talking about pirates and then the conversations jump to Depp-Heard defamation trial because Johnny Depp had played a pirate in a movie. We all do it.

There is nothing wrong with it, unless it becomes a default mode of thinking...
3/ Many social media arguments are the product of associative thinking. They are heated discussions that aren’t anchored to the topic at hand. They talk around the topic at best & often descend down an infinite regress of less and less relevant associations.

How does this start?
Read 11 tweets
May 2
1/ We have to carve out some space for pastors to speak intensely about those who lead Christians astray from within and without the church.

Consider a classic example of Paul in Phil. 3:2, “Watch out for those dogs, those men who do evil, those mutilators of the flesh."
2/ It is clear just from a straightforward reading of the text that Paul is far from polite here. He is being deliberately derogatory and even scathing.

Gordon Fee says of this passage that it is “expressed with powerful rhetoric, full of invective and sarcasm”.
3/ F. F. Bruce speaks of the “parody,” “invective,” and “opprobrious language” language used by Paul here.

Or as Markus Bockmuehl puts it, “The first paragraph explodes with a bitterly satirical attack on a group of enemies."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(