"The People" want to see unhoused people locked up in prison, but the least expensive and most effective way to deal with homelessness is to house people.
So do that, and just TELL all of these assholes "Yeah, you're safe now! We sent all them all to death row for being poor!"
Alternately, just say "Congratulations! You were all so horrible to those people that they finally hit rock bottom and pulled themselves up by their bootstraps." They'll be on a Sunday Morning show soon to share the #inspirational tale.
We know for a fact that mass incarceration produces more crime and also that these sorts of "voters" do not actually care if the person sent to prison actually did the crime so long as "someone pays."
But do they actually pay attention to who is in there? Not really!
Just lie to them and say "Oh yeah, we locked a guy up for 40 years just for bearing a passing resemblance to a guy who stole a purse!" and they'll be happy. It's not like they're going to check!
This will make them all feel very safe without needlessly hurting other people, and ironically will lead to them actually being more safe in the long run.
EEP, sorry, forgot to add an alt!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I feel like I should explain this more, not for debate reasons, but in case anyone finds it helpful.
Adderall was effective in that it slowed me down and made it possible for me to work, but I did not really feel like myself on it and it made me feel weird physically.
On Wellbutrin, things are slowed down but not in a *weird* way, and I feel more aware of things, generally, than I did before. I can listen and pay attention, I don't feel like I have to do a set of things before doing the thing I'm supposed to do, but I still feel like myself.
The first time I noticed that I was hungry in the morning and had breakfast was WILD.
And granted, things are different for everyone, but it's worked really well for me. I like that it also helps with anxiety and depression, as those tend to be comorbid for women who have it.
Except here's the thing — people don't just go to college for themselves. Everyone benefits from people going to college — and the absurdly high cost of it, plus all of the student loans have consequences *for all of us.*
No one lives in a vacuum, and all choices have consequences. If people just say "fuck it" and stop going to college, or if college becomes something exclusively for the rich, *we all lose out.* If people don't have money to buy things, other people won't be able to sell them.
I think that a lot of what people are getting upset about, insofar as cancel culture, is the upset of a social hierarchy they thought they'd be able to count on.
Like I was saying earlier, there is a lot of power in being able to be an asshole and get away with it.
It's like in teen movies where the "popular" kids are horrible monsters but everyone is falling all over themselves to be their friend.
We have a TON of media dedicated to the premise that there is a certain amount of good at your job/brilliant/talented/rich you can be that allows you to be shitty to people and have that be okay.
I feel like when people truly think what they're saying is right and good, they just don't get quite as defensive as they do when they say something they know is kind of shitty but have decided to say anyway.
Like I have absolutely had people jump all over me for being very Team Single Payer, but I'm not gonna be all like "Oh no, I'm being canceled for thinking everyone should have health care!" because I happen to truly believe that's the correct moral stance.
I have, however, definitely felt more defensive in situations where I know I'm in the wrong. Like when my sister would get annoyed with me for leaving lights on or something, I'd immediately go into "I'M NOT A BAD PERSON!" mode.
One thing I think about a lot is the great Cat Calling Discourse of 2014.
Men, apparently, had been going about their merry way for years, assuming that women enjoyed it when they yelled "Hey toots, nice rack" at them while they were walking down the street.
Many, I was led to believe, said they felt that this was their primary means of attracting a mate, and that without the ability to tell women they don't know that they're prettier when they smile, they'd be alone forever.
These men felt that their right to free speech was being violated by finding out that women did not in fact enjoy this at all, and would prefer they not do it. They had the expectation of being shielded from that information or from consequences for their actions.
I think we need to stop letting the Right push the talking point that they distrust the government. The ONLY time when they distrust the government is when the government is doing something to help people. In every other instance, they have ZERO questions.
They trust the police, they trust the justice system, they trust that everyone who is sent to prison belongs there, they trust that everyone on death row belongs there, they trust the gov't when the gov't wants to go to war.
No one who "doesn't trust the government" thinks the death penalty is a good idea, okay? You only think the death penalty is okay if you think the government doesn't make mistakes.