soso Profile picture
Jun 12 14 tweets 3 min read
a good opportunity to point out the various problems inherent with right wing organizations, how federal agencies operate in regards to these groups, and what it means for you:
“in real life” right wing organizations are functional nonstarters. the problems exist at an essential level; who, how, and why these groups are organized just compounds the issues, but the flaws are inherent to the idea itself.
any right wing group that identifies itself as separate from the republican party automatically isolates it from (what little) protection party association offers. tactics used to suppress dissidence amplify the further away a group identifies itself from the mainstream.
these tactics are soft suppression (doxing, employment imperilment, leftist harassment) or hard oppression (criminal charges, imprisonment, assassination). the legal system is stacked against regular citizens exercising their rights, see rittenhouse. radicals are even worse off.
so far, every right wing group’s political tactics have boiled down to the same thing: go somewhere and protest. the only difference has been color schemes and chosen chants. this tactic has done nothing to move national politics more rightward, and in several cases only hurt it.
the political situation is not great, and there are critical issues that face the right on an existential level. the direness of this situation necessitates intelligence, pragmatism, and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. qualities that are absent in “the movement.”
enter the federal agencies: the feds’ literal job is to disrupt groups opposed to or in competition with the state and the current regime, and they have been at it for over a century. they are especially adept at targeting organized groups.
this is done primarily through informants, either actual undercover agents who instigate actions that enable the use of hard oppression (see whitmer plot) or through “turned” individuals within organizations that are coerced into providing information for use in soft suppression.
there is no solution to either case. no amount of screening, vetting, or personal trust can safeguard against this. sooner or later, the group will be compromised and its honest members will become yet more victims of modern american tyranny.
is patriot front a federal operation? it’s probably mostly organic i.e. filled with real people with genuine beliefs that aren’t too different from most here, but heavily infiltrated by the feds, agents and turncoats. it’s irrelevant either way. their strategy is a dead end.
so what can be done?

first, accept that the tactics have to evolve past charlottesville. it doesn’t work, it will never work, and you only endanger yourself and the right as a whole by trying to make it work. there are other options, attempting what has already failed isn’t one.
second, be suspicious of any individual or group that wants your information, that wants you to engage in the above mentioned tactics, and presents themselves as the only salvation for the right, whatever niche ideology they trademark themselves. even if they genuine believe it.
third, stop being publicists for those too stupid or ill-intentioned who keep pursuing this strategy. the whole point of these public displays is to gain notoriety, which they want to leverage into gaining more members. deny this to them. even mockery is too much attention.
there is a path to victory. there is a strategy to gaining power. trying the same thing over again is not that strategy. repeating the same mistakes is a path to gaining nothing. if we’re going to win this thing, we have to be a lot smarter than this.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with soso

soso Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chernayakoshka

Mar 20
most of the right has a total misconception of the basic organization and archetypical structure of the left, its goals, and how it intermeshes with the current state. a thread:
there are three basic types of leftist, the commentator, the criminal, and the commissar. each work together, knowingly or unknowingly, to further the broader political goals of the left, whatever their own niche ideological stripe and self identity.
the commentator is the over-socialized bourgeois liberal, who occupy positions of social respectability or aspire to them. they are convinced of the moral correctness of leftist rhetoric, they provide the cover for violent action. they call arson and murder “peaceful protest.”
Read 10 tweets
Mar 2
URBAN ARMOR!

it’s a well-worn canard of armchair tacticians to asset that “tanks do poorly in urban combat,” but is that necessarily true? what is really being argued? should tanks sit parked on the outskirts of an urban battle?

a short thread debunking this tired maxim:
where does this idea come from?

tanks, from their outset, were designed to withstand enemy fire and destroy hard points, while also being mobile enough to exploit breakthroughs in the front. armor, firepower, and mobility is the balanced trinity of good tank design.
the tank excels in the plains, where it can take full advantage of the armor plating providing its own cover, the main armament reaching its maximum effective range, and mobility to maneuver effectively over flat terrain.

the urban environment couldn’t be more different.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 21
the ukraine crisis is proof positive that america’s time as a superpower is over, highlighting the decline in our hard and soft power foreshadowed by the defeat in afghanistan and the farce of a stolen presidential election.
the failure in afghanistan could be excused away; poor allies, no national will, the challenges of fighting an insurgency. the reality is the US military is a paper tiger. it’s a hollowed out money-pit that can’t actually fight, and is under the control of strategic imbeciles.
the threat of american hard power is nonexistent, especially in regards to “near-peer” nations. american military prowess is a myth riding the coattails of the gulf war, but that military hasn’t existed for 30 years. what wears its skin now wouldn’t win that war, or any other.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 7, 2021
A DAY OF INFAMY!

80 years ago today, the japanese bombed pearl harbor. the attack and the war that followed is a well known story, but what logic lead to it?

this thread is about two thinkers, alfred thayer mahan and sir julian corbett, and their views on naval strategy!
“the influence of sea power on history” was written in 1890 by mahan, a US navy officer, and immediately influenced the nature of sea power soon after. almost directly responsible for the naval arms race preceding world war I, it was translated and read by every major power.
“some principles of maritime strategy” was written some 20 years later by corbett, a british lawyer and strategist, and provided a different view on the essence of good naval strategy. although it is fashionable to contrast the two, in many ways their works are complementary!
Read 16 tweets
Dec 3, 2021
LONG LIVE THE KING OF BATTLE!

in this thread I’m talking BIG GUNS, artillery and its use in the world wars, and the underlying doctrine and theory that dictated how modern militaries learned to reach out and touch somebody!
the rise of the cannon saw its golden age in the wars of napoleon, himself a young artillery officer, and reached its zenith in the first world war. in a war to end all wars, the use of artillery turned the earth into a barren landscape and killed more men than any other weapon.
the third arm of the army, along infantry and cavalry, artillery embodies the destructive principle of fire. it can’t maneuver, it can’t fight in close order, but it can obliterate all that it is aimed at. it evolved from mere support into the primary means of violence.
Read 17 tweets
Nov 9, 2021
the biggest challenge facing the right today is a poverty of VISION. there is plenty talk over reactionary negation; stop this mandate, win this court case, but nothing presenting a positive alternative. imagine what could be done if we were serious about taking power.
the conservative intelligentsia and talking head aspirants cannot imagine any more than turning the clock back to 2000 or adopting leftist positions on economics and social policy. everyone is chasing cars, and nobody knows what do when they catch one.
the only things that can be learned from the left is the value of unified political will in pursuit of their own agenda, and the ability to pursue those goals simultaneously.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(