I spent two days last week with social services professionals from 40+ countries at the @ESNsocial conference in Hamburg. A quick thread here on some key #socialcare themes. Very impressionistic and not always evidenced so take with large pinch of ‘salz’. essc-eu.org/about-essc-202…
Increasing demand for services seemed a consistent issue, forcing at least some countries to evaluate what they do and how. One Icelandic delegate said its country’s approach was ‘moving from a right to have services to a need to have services’.
That demand was mainly driven by long term factors, particularly ageing populations. But inevitably it was exacerbated by COVID-19, which exposed underlying structural problems. ‘We were unprepared as a sector’ said @ThomasBignal. Sound familiar? kingsfund.org.uk/publications/c…
But the war in Ukraine is now having serious impact (and feels far more urgent and immediate than in the UK). Before, the city of Hamburg was seeing 1,800 refugees a month. Now it is seeing 1,800 a day.
Meeting demand, particularly in #socialcare, was made harder because of an ageing and underpaid workforce, with pay consistently below the average in most countries said @IvailoKalfin. COVID brought more recognition but one delegate asked ‘Is applauding enough?’ Familiar again.
My presentation, on the need to recruit a younger workforce, seemed to resonate. As one Danish delegate later said, we need to make work places ‘delicious’ for young people to work in. kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2021/11/s…
Other common issues emerging: data management/security; integration of health/care; tensions between national/municipality/local levels; medicalisation. And another familiar one: a French delegate bemoaned that ‘money is spent on repair and not on prevention.’
Some issues resonated even more strongly for England than others. When a Belgian delegate complained that ‘there is too much focus on preventing fraud so we have turned a ‘helpful process into an administrative process’, I couldn’t help thinking ‘direct payments’.
There were lots of ideas on show. I was interested in the Vienna Social Fund’s council in which 34 reps are elected by its ‘clients’: 9,000 people with disabilities. essc-eu.org/project-forum-…
I also really liked the idea of the ‘Aarhus compass’ and its attempt to reimagine the city’s role as ‘less system. Though, as with the Vienna example, it’s hard to know how meaningful this is without knowing a great deal more. That’ll have to wait for another day though.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lots of interest today in @TheKingsFund@NuffieldTrust findings about public satisfaction with the NHS. But the findings about #socialcare are no less remarkable. Only 15% say they are satisfied - the lowest of all services asked about. 50% are dissatisfied. A short thread…
This year, the survey asked WHY people are satisfied (or not). The main reasons are staff pay, unmet need, unaffordability of #socialcare and lack of support for unpaid carers. Lack of integration between health and care also gets a look in. These are familiar problems…
…and all grounded in fact: the number of people able to access long-term care has been falling since 2015/16, workforce pay has failed to keep pace with other sectors and 1 in 7 people are now estimated to face lifetime care costs of over £100,000. kingsfund.org.uk/publications/s…
This is an important analysis on the implications of @DHSCgovuk 'fair cost of care' reform, which has received less attention than the 'cap' but involves an unprecedented, potentially risky intervention by govt in the #socialcare market. Quick thread: countycouncilsnetwork.org.uk/new-analysis-w…
'Fair cost of care' basically involved the government funding local authorities to pay more for the care home places/homecare they commission. Why is government bothered about that? Two, related reasons...
1. Most councils, because they're short of cash, 'underpay' for publicly-funded care home places/homecare. To compensate, providers 'overcharge' people who self-fund their own care. This 'self-funder subsidy' is obviously unfair. However, it's not why govt is acting now...
Though it has some good measures, the govt’s white paper is lightweight and underfunded to deliver real reform of adult #socialcare. A rapidly written thread on how the WP sits alongside the Health and Care Bill, Build Back Better and the spending review. gov.uk/government/pub…
First, a reminder of key stuff already announced:
- @CareQualityComm to oversee council delivery of #socialcare
- more generous means test
- £86k cap
- £500m for workforce wellbeing
- a promise of a ‘fair price of care’ to ensure selffunders pay same as publicly funded clients
The white paper tries to provide a vision that wraps these reforms together and it’s not bad: choice, control and independent lives; outstanding quality; fairness and accessibility. The problem comes when it tries to back this up with action and money.
This has profound implications for #socialcare. EU workers currently make up 1 in 11 careworkers and, from January 1st, they will not be replaced when they leave. So social care will have to find more British nationality workers. 1/6 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
1 in 13 jobs (122,000) in the sector is already vacant, far higher than the average in other industries (and rising). Unemployment is low so, without EU workers, #socialcare employers will have to entice these staff from sectors like retail. 2/6