"The British values of civility, dialogue & mutual respect would usually suggest a different approach to disagree or address differences with someone with whom the government has had a sustained relationship for over a decade" - @qariasim on #wato
bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0…
bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0…
The Imam heard about Dept's letter of dismissal from the media, then finding it online on their website. No Minister, official or adviser made any contact pre-publication, nor did they even send the senior faith leader a copy of their (unsigned, undated) letter addressed to him
A lot of people in faith and civic society say that was extremely poor behaviour by government
This critical challenge to the Imam from Archbishop Cranmer, agreeing with the govt decision, says he was treated shoddily and without respect or courtesy
archbishopcranmer.com/the-censorious…
This critical challenge to the Imam from Archbishop Cranmer, agreeing with the govt decision, says he was treated shoddily and without respect or courtesy
archbishopcranmer.com/the-censorious…
That they could have dismissed him with more civility is not just a process point. Lack of contact affects the substance too.
Imam says letter's association with him with anti-Shia rhetoric is defamatory & inaccurate, in saying he had not challenged things he had condemned.
Imam says letter's association with him with anti-Shia rhetoric is defamatory & inaccurate, in saying he had not challenged things he had condemned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
