Ahem... I have to correct General Hertling on the organization of US Army divisions:
• since 6 June there are 11 active US Army divisions (not 10).
• DIVARTY has no battalions. Artillery battalions are now organic to the Brigade Combat Teams. Today DIVARTY is responsible 1/n
for fire support coordination of a division's brigades' artillery battalions.
• since 2013 all brigade howitzer battalions have 18x howitzers (Armored: 18x M109A6/A7, Stryker: 18x M777A2, Infantry: 12x M119A3 and 6x M777A2); before 2013
2/n
battalions had 2x batteries of 8x howitzers. 24x howitzers was the Cold War era complement of artillery battalions.
• divisions don't have rocket artillery anymore. Divisional rocket artillery batteries of 9x M270 were phased out after the Cold War.
3/n
• all US Army rocket artillery (M270A1 and M142) is assigned to battalions in 6x active and 8x Army National Guard Field Artillery brigades (currently 16x per battalions, but this will increase to 27x per battalion)
• the 11 active US divisions field 198x M109A6/A7,
4/n
162x M777A2, and 144x M119A3 - a total of 504x howitzers (and not 240x) and they field 0 rocket systems.
• 108x M777 are exactly 6x field artillery battalions (and not "almost 5").
• DISCOMs were reflagged as Sustainment Brigades in 2004-2007 or inactivated.
5/n
As I do all the graphics on wikipedia relating to military organizations and wrote all the Cold War era military organization articles I kinda know exactly how NATO and EU armies were and are organized.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
6/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Precision mechanical engineering: the M777 went into production in 2005 and BAE Systems and Watervliet Arsenal use the most modern machinery to manufacture the M777 and its barrel. Every M777 coming of the production line is identical to all others. There are no deviations.
The same perfection and precision applies to the projectiles, fuzes, primers and charges. They are manufactured with the most modern machinery and there are no deviations.
The Soviet stuff the Ukrainians used until now is between 30 to 50 years old. All of it was produced by
2/n
people operating machines... no two Soviet howitzers are perfectly matched. The rifling of Soviet barrels is horrible imprecise when compared to the perfect rifling of a M777 barrel. And those Soviet barrels are worn out by now, plus Soviet sights are wildy imprecise when
3/n
This is part of a longer video from @radiosvoboda about Ukraine's CAESAR howitzers (link in next tweet).
They fire OE 155 F1 High Explosive rounds with RALEC F3 proximity fuzes and 5x charges = distance to target is 24 km and it is a soft target (likely russian infantry).
1/4
At 4 seconds you can see the rightmost gunner pick up the fuze setter to set the detonation height for the proximity fuzes.
At 14 seconds you see a major fuck up - one gunner puts the charges down in the dirt 😱😱
2/4 The full video is on youtube:
But besides that they do an excellent job with the CAESAR. An excellent artillery system (see linked thread) that I am sure is right now killing more russian troops than the 108 US delivered M777 combined.
NATO members can't sent their newest vehicles to Ukraine, because NATO members don't have vehicles anymore... what they have are computers on wheels.
This is the interior of an Italian Army jeep. One soldier drives, the other operates the computer.
1/n
In between them is the secure, jamming-resistant, encrypted radio system. If russia would capture one of these, not only would the russians be able to hack the Italian Army's encrypted signal network... even worse
2/n
the russians would get access to various command and control (C2) systems. Like i.e. BFSA, which depicts every Italian vehicle and squad on all Italian units' maps in blue and every enemy position in red (photo).
If an enemy has access to that, it becomes really easy to 3/n
The currently best howitzer in Ukraine (on both sides) is the French CAESAR.
The reason is that the CAESAR arrived with its fire control system (FCS) intact and working.
It's FCS enables the CAESAR to stop, emplace via GPS, fire, and depart in under 3 minutes.
1/n
Modern FCS tie into an army's artillery command and control (C2) system to receive target information.
Some of NATO's artillery C2 systems are:
🇺🇸 AFATDS
🇩🇪 ADLER II
🇵🇱 TOPAZ
🇫🇷 ATLAS
🇮🇹 SIF (photo)
russia would love to gain access & hack these systems. 2/n
Therefore FCS systems are classified as secret.
Some of the older howitzers delivered to Ukraine didn't have an integrated FCS and therefore were delivered to Ukraine quickly: i.e. Norwegian M109A3GN and Italian FH70.
Ukraine now uses its own GIS Arta C2 system to calculate 3/n
I will dwell on this video of a Ukrainian M109 section coming under russian fire a little bit longer:
Once you start laying out ammo behind your self-propelled howitzer you signal to the russian drone operator: "I am gonna stay here for a while."
1/5
This obviously allows the russians to calmly get an Uragan or Smerch multiple rocket launcher into position to hit you.
So don't ever do that! This is why the M109 stores 36 rounds inside! You load the ammo and charges outside of enemy rocket range, then you drive into the
2/5
combat zone, and shoot and scoot, shoot and scoot - for up to 6x times. This way you don't give the russians the time to shoot back, even if they spot you with a drone.
Luckily the russians fired cluster munitions at the 4x M109. As @UAWeapons pointed out likely a
3/5