Hello everyone! Today for #learnSEO I’m going to share a long thread to summarize the important bits from my SMX advanced talk - Using a knowledge of semantic search to improve E-A-T.
I learned so much in creating this talk!
👇
Did you know that Google says that “assessing your own content in terms of E-A-T criteria may help it align with signals that Google uses to rank content?”
What does E-A-T have to do with semantic search though? Let’s unpack what semantic search is. It’s search that understands the meaning of words and the connections between them.
When you do a search and see xx million results, that’s lexical search showing how many pages could be a match for this query. They’re ordered by the traditional PageRank based algo. Filters can be applied (like Panda and Penguin) to improve quality.
Much of Google’s understanding of concepts and entities and how they relate to each other comes from the Knowledge graph. Knowledge retrieval is a form of semantic search.
Some studies show that adding About schema (to tell Google what main topic is covered) and Mention schema (what topics are also mentioned) can help improve rankings.
In the QRG, raters are told to look for evidence of other people referencing a content creator or business.
Now, Google’s algos are not doing site: searches to replicate this. But I do believe they are looking to find connections that support you having expertise on a topic. #LearnSEO
So how do you put this into practice? 1) Find ways to get mentioned on authoritative sites. Not for the PageRank (although that’s still helpful if you can get it), but for the connections to support your expertise.
Think HARO, producing content that is truly linkworthy, good PR
2) Create topical authority to demonstrate a deep level of knowledge on your topics. The more expert level content you have on a topic, the more likely you are to be seen as authoritative.
The topic layer of the kg🤯:
“built by analyzing all the content that exists on the web for a given topic and develops hundreds and thousands of subtopics.”
“We then look at patterns to understand how these subtopics relate to each other”
To sum up
✅Assessing content from an EAT perspective may help it rank better
✅Make your entity information as clear as possible (schema)
✅Get links & mentions from truly authoritative sites discussing your topic
✅Create topic hubs to demonstrate depth of expertise #LearnSEO
A quick thread for those experiencing traffic drops in the last month.
So many sites are seeing significant declines in Google rankings and traffic.
If you submitted your site for me to test my tool, first, ty! But secondly, I want to share why I have put the tool on hold...
In building the tool, I realized it doesn't matter whether we can determine if it is the Helpful Content Update, the Link Spam update or one of these random blips (Feb 4, 18, etc.)
The advice is the same...learn to create the most helpful content possible.
(And it may not be what *you* think is helpful.)
I've found it's hard for SEOs and site owners to think like searchers. We often have this picture that our users read every word we write. We write way too many words.
Did you know Google updated their search quality evaluator guidelines this week?
We pay attention to these because they can give us clues as to what Google wants to accomplish with their search algorithms.
Here are five things I found interesting with this revision.
👇
1) YMYL is now more clearly defined.
Understanding this is important because Google says in their guide to how they fight disinformation that they give more weight to their understanding of EAT for YMYL topics.
The main question to ask re whether your content is YMYL is whether the topic, or inaccurate information on the topic has the potential to harm.
(They also changed many instances of "YMYL pages" to "YMYL topics.")
Here are some of the sites we monitor that did well following the May core update and the tremors that followed. A little thread with what these sites cover and why they may have done well.
1/7
First, a medical advice site.
➡️Written by a doctor who is very well known.
➡️Pages are well structured with headings - easy to skim
➡️Does a very good job of answering the questions a searcher would have for each topic 2/7
Next, another medical advice site. This one covers many alternative medical topics as well.
➡️Pages structured so it is easy to find the answer you are looking for
➡️Uses examples of first hand real patient experiences
➡️Very thoroughly covers their topics 3/7
Q4:
If your traffic or rankings declined following this update, it may not be because of the update! What are some common *other* reasons for losses to be seen?
A4 There are lots of possible reasons for traffic/rankings to drop. Ranking changes happen daily. It could just be that a competitor has stepped up their game.
If you made technical changes recently, look to those first.
I wrote this a while back when I was doing mostly Google penalty work. Most of it still applies today for traffic drops. mariehaynes.com/reasons-for-tr…