Share this page!

Wokal Distance Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jun 18 • 11 tweets • 6 min read
1/
 @realchrisrufo wants to stop using the term "drag queens" and start saying "trans-strippers," and people are missing the point about why.

We don't shift the wording to be dishonest, we do it it because of the tactic the woke use to defend sexualized drag shows for kids.

🧵
2/
 This video shows what regular people are upset about: a transvestite with breasts exposed doing a sexualized performance in front of children.

The problem is what happens when regular people say "these drag queens are not appropriate for children..."

3/
 When parents say "drag queens are not appropriate for kids"

The woke say "what about Mrs. Doubtfire? That was drag too."

See how it works? They do a drag queen strip show, and if you say drag queens are not appropriate to kids they switch and say "what about Mrs Doubtfire?"
4/
 When you say "drag queens are not O.K. for kids" the woke bring up Mrs. Doubtfire and you get stuck because technically Mrs. Doubtfire is a drag queen.

People are upset about strip shows for children, not Mrs. Doubtfire or bugs bunny dressed as a girl

This is the woke game👇
5/
 What @realchrisrufo is saying is:

"If you say 'drag queen' they can play dumb and start a debate about Mrs Doubfire, and theb do a strip show but pretend it's no different than Mrs Doubtfire. If you say 'trans stripper' they can't do that."

That is the point Chris is making.
6/
 'drag queen' refers to both Mrs Doubtfire and transvestite strip shows, and if you say 'drag queen' you include Mrs Doubtfire and transvestite strip shows.

The woke use this ambiguity to defend strip shows for kids by making it look like you're attacking Mrs Doubtfire.
7/
 @realchrisrufo is saying:
"call this what it is. Don't let them play games with language. These are sexualized performances by transvestites and transsexuals. Let's call them 'trans strippers' so the woke can't hide strip shows for kids behind debates about 'Mrs Doubtfire'..."
8/
 That is the point.

@realchrisrufo doesn't want you yo say Mrs Doubfire is a stripper...he wants you to use language that prevents the woke from using word games to pretend that the video below is just like Mrs. Doubtfire.

9/
 The dishonest way the left uses language means we must refuse to use the wokeists deceptive terminology, and instead use language which prevents them from playing nitpicky language games in order to dodge the point, play dumb, or deceive people.
10/
 The trans stripper below is what we want kept away from kids.

Let's call it what it is...a trans strip show. Let's show people what's really going on, and then let the woke try to say the performance in the video below is just like Mrs Doubtfire

/fin
PS/
I have a substack where I explain woke tactics and postmodernism (the worldview of wokeness)

Here is an essay about how the woke take over institutions:
wokaldistance.substack.com/p/taking-a-wal…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture
Jun 16
1/
 🚨I am now on Substack!🚨

I'll post essays explaining wokeness and postmodernism so you can understand how to fight back.

This is my second essay. It's about walking through postmodern society, and tactics the woke use to take over institutions:
wokaldistance.substack.com/p/taking-a-wal…
2/
 It's free to subscribe, but I'll eventually add a paid option for those who appreciate my work amd eamt to support me.

It takes a lot of time and effort to dig this stuff up and figure out how to explain it. It's hours and hours a day of reading woke academic Jargon...
3/
 And sifting through activist literature to work out which ideas they actually put into practice, and hours to research what their tactics are and how to counter those tactics.

It's a lot of work.

If my explanations help you and you wsnt to support me that would be wonderful!
Read 4 tweets
Wokal Distance Profile picture
Jun 14
1/🚨🚨🚨
The Woke know they're losing, so they're desperate and are now trying to seize complete control of the narrative.

The Woke can't win by persuasion so they're using Big Tech to gatekeep the public square so only woke opinions get a platform

Let's talk about it

THREAD🧵
2/
 The woke want a co-ordinated purge of anyone who does not fully agree with woke and trans activism.

The goal here is to remove all anti-woke and gender critical opinions from social media so the woke can manufacture a false consensus.
3/
 The evolutionary biologist Colin Wright @SwipeWright was de-platformed by Paypal *and* Etsy...on the same day.

Those are separate companies. The fact that they both banned @SwipeWright on the same day is no coincidence: this is a coordinated purge.

Read 23 tweets
Wokal Distance Profile picture
Jun 13
1/
 If you want to understand why mass shootings coupled to political manifesto's happen in the U.S. you need to understand the culture from which they emerge.

In America the law, judges, courts and police (the institutions of justice) have lost their moral authority.

So...
2/
 It should come as no surprise that every person who see themselves as wronged, aggrieved, defrauded, harmed or otherwise denied justice feels fully justified in taking justice into their own hands.

They see America as unjust, they will take justice for themselves, by force.
3/
 From the BLM riots, the to the people who broke into the capitol, to political mass shootings, people see themselves as political "Robin Hood's." But instead of going outside the law to "steal from the rich to give to the poor," they go outside the law to administer pay back
Read 11 tweets
Wokal Distance Profile picture
Jun 7
This is explained by Moral Foundations theory.

MF says there are 5 axis that make up moral foundations
1. care/harm
2. Fairness/cheating
3. Loyalty/betrayal
4. Authority/subversion
5. Sanctity/impurity
6. Liberty/oppression (maybe)

Here is the problem...
Foundations 3,4, and 5 are binding foundations that help groups bind together and co-operate, and the left rejects them and thinks:

-Loyalty to a group is the basis of racism and exclusion.
-Authority is oppression.
-purity is just a way to suppress female and lgbt sexuality
And for this reason someone like Felicia Sonmez is perfectly willing to toss her "friend" Dave Weigel under the bus.

She has no loyalty. Why? Because she thinks loyalty is an impedimemt to justice. The ONLY moral foundations she has are care and fairness. If she thinks...
Read 7 tweets
Wokal Distance Profile picture
Jun 3
1/
 What is a woman?

In the @MattWalshBlog documentary "What is a Woman?" woke gender experts say:

-No one thing makes someone a woman
-Woman can mean many things to many people
-Some Women have penises

Let's explain what's happening here, and how to push back.

A thread🧵
2/
 The first thing we need to do is get clear about why they say Women can have penises, there's no one thing that defines "woman", and woman can mean many things to many people.

Why do they think this?

We need to understand WHY they believe these things before we can push back
3/
 To understand this we need to unpack a point about language and especially "categories." This is the hardest part of this thread, but once we have this point nailed down the rest is easy.

Wokeness thinks that all categories are "socially constructed." What that means is...
Read 45 tweets
Wokal Distance Profile picture
Jun 2
1/
 It does not matter if evangelicals know the latin name for the deductive argument form and rule of inference known as "denying the consequent."

FWIW I'll bet 50% of professors in the humanities outside philosophy can't define "Modus Tollens" without looking it up...
2/
 I think the typical evangelical can follow along just fine if I say

"Here is the argument:
1.If A is true, then B must also be true.
2. It turns out that B is false
therefore
3. A must also be false because if A were true, be would be true, but B is not true."

further...
3/
 I am not sure that because someone doesn't know the following notation below:

1. A->B
2. ~B
:.
3.~A

That they can't understand the idea If A implies B, And B is not the case, that therefore A is not the case.

I think evangelicals use "modus tollens" all the time...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(