Yesterday the Ukrainian government admitted their vehicle loss figures, revealing catastrophic losses over the course of the war thus far.
This tells us something critical about the info war: that the Russian MoD's claims about their own operations are basically true.
To provide a little background - the Russian Ministry of Defense puts out daily updates about their operations in Ukraine. They're quite dry and consist largely of statistics about artillery fire missions, airstrikes, and Ukrainian equipment and facilities claimed destroyed.
I have maintained in the past (and been harshly criticized for doing so) that these statistics are truthful and that if the Russian MoD is lying, they're lying by omission rather than making up figures.
Two key pieces of information came out recently to validate my position.
First of all, the Ukrainian government admitted last week that the Russians are firing approximately 50,000 artillery shells at them daily. This was in line with an earlier logistical analysis I did using official Russian fire mission figures.
Second of all, this Wednesday Ukraine's deputy minister of defense for procurement made an astonishing admission in an interview with National Defense Magazine - that their units are operating with between 50-70% of their rated equipment.
This is a current deficiency of some 400 tanks and 1300 infantry carriers, as well as 700 artillery pieces.
Bear in mind that these appear to be -net- losses representing current deficiencies in unit tables of equipment, not -gross- losses of total vehicles destroyed thus far.
This distinction is quite important - Ukraine has already gotten hundreds of donated foreign vehicles, and it had a considerable post-Soviet stockpile of unallocated reserve equipment prewar. Damaged vehicles are also frequently repaired and put back into service.
And yet despite all of this Ukraine is still currently short some 1700 combat vehicles and 700 cannons.
To tie this back in: the Russian MoD is claiming that over the course of the war they've destroyed 3600 Ukrainian combat vehicles and 2000 cannons and mortars.
(note that the Russian kill category is broader than the Ukrainian claim by also including mortars, which would be elsewhere in a Ukrainian brigade's ToE than the artillery systems discussed in the interview - although the Russians also claim another 547 rocket launchers)
Even if the Ukrainian admission represented -gross- losses this would still be fairly accurate, as good battle damage assessment is quite difficult (consider fatal ammo fires versus harmless reactive armor fires), vehicles get repaired, etc.
Considering that this is a -net- figure taking into account the full effects of foreign donations and reactivated reserve vehicles to replace losses, however, it appears that the Russian MoD's kill counter is highly accurate and based on a pretty good battle damage assessment.
This Ukrainian admission is further buttressed by their request last week for a gigantic amount of combat equipment - basically enough to fill this identified deficiency. I addressed this in a previous thread.
As such we now know (with some confidence!) that the Russians are putting out their own real, internal assessments in their daily updates - and not made-up figures for propaganda purposes. /end
Addendum: I've seen it suggested that the Ukrainians are now exaggerating their own losses in an attempt to get more Western aid, but I don't consider that particularly credible. It would be a wild 180 from their previous messaging, and it's not consistent with the battlefield.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The closest historical analogy to the Ukrainian War I can think of is the American Civil War - ironically a conflict that Europeans have always shied away from carefully studying.
A thread.⬇️
The underlying causes of the American Civil War festered for decades, finally erupting into open conflict after a series of political calculations and miscalculations brought down a national compromise that increasingly resembled a house of cards.
Ditto Ukraine. I've said elsewhere the number of political offramps available to Western leaders to avoid this war were so numerous that the fact war broke out can only be explained as the result of anti-Russian policy - clearly miscalculated policy given the results thus far.
Top 10 pro-Ukrainian talking points - and why they're nonsense.⬇️
10. Ukraine is a democracy!
False. The last free and fair election in Ukraine - not held under an ultranationalist jackboot after the 2014 coup - was in 2010.
All elections in Ukraine have been suspended since 2022, and Zelensky's five-year term from 2019 expired months ago.
9. Russia is an autocracy!
False. Vladimir Putin and United Russia enjoy approval ratings among the Russian public that are extremely high, even in polling conducted by Western-backed, anti-Putin organizations.
Putin is popular enough to win any election held in Russia handily.
How many plans has NATO gone through to try to beat Russia in Ukraine?
Let's count 'em!
Plan A: The FGM-148 Javelin
It seems absurd now, but in late 2021 NATO's leadership thought Javelin was a tank-deleting magic wand that would deter Putin from challenging Zelensky's scheme to conquer the LDPR.
Javelin failed in service and is a rare sight on the battlefield.
Plan B: The Kazakh Gambit
The West quite obviously fomented an uprising in Kazakhstan in January 2022 in hopes of distracting Russia from the then-boiling Ukrainian crisis.
Didn't work. CSTO troops arrived and helped the Kazakh government crush the would-be color revolution.
Late last week the Ukrainian command, seeing their offensive in Sudzha-Koronevo bog down, tried to expand the flanks of their salient into Russian territory in Kursk. Part of this was an attack on the Glushkovo district to the west.
The Glushkovo District is somewhat isolated from the Russian interior by the Seim River.
Having learned the wrong lessons from their 2022 counteroffensive in Kherson, the AFU command decided to try to induce a wholesale Russian withdrawal by attacking the bridges over the Seim.
The large road bridge at Glushkovo, the district center, would be their first target. As in Kherson two years ago, HIMARS fired on the bridge with GMLRS. As in Kherson two years ago, it was ineffective.
Unlike in Kherson two years ago, the Russians killed the HIMARS launcher.
Today was probably the worst day for the Armed Forces of Ukraine since February 2022.
Let's walk through it.
The Russians started the day off by destroying two HIMARS launchers at their hide site in Sumy. This has likely ended GMLRS support for the Kursk operation temporarily.
Next to emerge was a video of a MiG-29* struck at an airfield near Dnipropetrovsk, just as it was being armed and the pilot had climbed in for preflight.
Once again the Russians coldly waited to cause maximum casualties among key AFU personnel.
* initially reported as an Su-24
13 Ukrainian soldiers were caught on camera surrendering in Kursk, and today was the first day I didn't even hear substantive rumors of new AFU advances in the area. Instead they seem to have lost considerable ground.
Top 10 Failed Wonderweapons of the Ukrainian War⬇️
My criteria are simple - these are weapons (defined loosely) that were heavily hyped by Western pundits that actually failed in service.
So, for example, the Leopard 2 isn't on here because it's actually a perfectly functional tank that has performed in line with other tanks.
10. The Ukrainian Foreign Legion
After the war kicked off, Western outlets began encouraging adventurous foreigners to travel to Ukraine to fight. These new recruits were housed in barracks at the Yavorov Training Ground.
One Russian missile strike largely ended the project.