#Agniveer Def Ser Regulation gives absolute auth to Services Chiefs & Army Cdrs to bring any organisational changes incl ser conditions of soldiers with financial backing from Govt. This is a system followed in Monarchy like England. It must stop. India is a parliamentary demo
Art 309 of our Constitution wants Parl to frame laws for service conditions of public servents.. Such laws have been made for many civil services? But why not for Military? Problem of military is adhocism..
And when puppet Generals are being used by politicians for their own political purposes... You have situation like #Agniveer where certain caste based political lobbies want to abolish Kaumi Regiments playing cunning games.
This big loophole must be plugged.. Parl must frame laws for Ser conditions of soldiers under article 309...this adhocism and exploitation of citizens and soldiers with typical colonial mindsets must stop.. India is not a monarchy..
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now as #Agniveer is fait accompli. What future holds? 1. In these Agniveers pvt militias like RSS will infiltrate their cadres & once released use them in their pvt security companies to have military trained pvt army.. Cost of such army will be borne by Corporates like Adani
2. Similarly other groups may also infiltrate their cadres & do same as RSS. 3. Some may be absorbed in Govt 4. Some top performers will join pvt mil companies operating globally and take part in global conflicts 5. Some may form their own mafia and will become L & O problem
6. These #Agniveers will surely form a union and will become a strong political lobby in itself.. 7. Within Army Agniveers will be a seperate class and will never become part of Regimentation. It will certainly split army at grassroot op levels into two. Regulars and Tourists.
#Agniveers Mrs Gandi made clever and cunning use of victory in 71 war and her popularity then to abolish privy purses. It was purely an unconstitutional political restructuring of India. She also wanted to scrap martial history of India by disbanding Kaumi Regts..
She and a caste based lobby supported actions alienated Sikhs in Punjab.. We know what happened therafter.. She lost her life.. What Indra could not do.. Modi is trying same to help this caste based lobby to further consolidate their grip on political power of India..
Modi sir Whatever you do you can not take away military pride and glorious military history of certain people and societies... Read history.. Whenever such moves made these ppl wrote history..
#Agniveers is not to cut costs. This scheme has been launched with pure political objectives to disband caste based Koumi Regiments. Will severely impact such castes by cutting their political stakes in Govt, reducing jobs & their earning. It will reduce cash flows in rural eco
Youths of such castes and social groups having aggressive behaviours if not gainfully employed will surely create threat to national security.. These regiments are their pride and history. It gives them a sense of security. They carry pride in arming themselves..
If you disarm them like this.. They will surely find otherways to arm themselves.. And such desires and frustrations could also be used by foriegn powers.. Why create breeding grounds for such armed rebellions? Don't play dirty politics..Don't forget why and how Punjab burned?
#Agniveer is final step to politically restructure Mil Govt to help establish complete Brahmin Raaj in Civil Govt domain. It is a broad day light robbery of political stakes, military history and pride of Mahars, Muslims, Sikhs, Rajputs, Marathas, Jats, Gurjars, Ahirs..
It will abolish regimentation system which is backbone of any fighting force and is used as an effective model by every professional army in one form or other. This very idea that tech and machines have replaced men hence soldiers can be on contract will bring military disasters
The current model has high risks of triggering civil wars between private militias formed by Contractual Soldiers.. This change in political structure of military govt of India will est complete Brahmin Raaj.
What does Constitution say on role of military in defending it? 1. If civil govt fails to perform in accordance with constitution, thn military must impose martial law and restore situation for constitution to remain in force 2.
2. If situation is out of control of civil govt, they can call military in aid to civil authority. Military thn under auth as vested in them controls situation and hands it over back to civil govt 3. It is duty of every citizen to prevent cognizable offences and if possible
It is duty of every citizen to prevent cognizable offences and if possible arrest such offenders... Officers and soldiers also have been given such duty and they can not say that they will not act as they have not been requisitioned or martial law is not in force..
If you read history, you find in many battles Indian defenders mobilized much larger army against invading force & yet they lost in home ground? Why? Let me explain 1. Indian defenders were always like crowd - soldiers on contract #TourofDuty of Modi 2. Gave unorganized battles
Halla Bol was favorite battle strategy of Indians. Just gather crowd with arms and just stand wait. Could never develop idea of organized battles. like Peshwa moving his Muslim arty as vanguard against Abdali defying every mil tactics.
3. Centralized command in King and if kind died-U Army dispersed. 4. Using animals as shield. War elephants are excellent offensive weapons but were always used as defensive shield. Result they could never prove fatal rather turned back and routed ur own army. 5..Caste system.