But back to the product. Certainly VERY exciting. Impossible foods is so AMAZING because they claim to have produced the ingredient that make meat so tasty.
We're talking about hemoglobin (or haemoglobin for Brit peeps).
Vegans should look away now.
Seems such a simple molecule. I mean, we can synthesise spike proteins from viruses so we should be able to synthesise hemoglobin, right?
It's actually such a complicated molecule that there are a whole bunch of diseases where it goes wrong - either with production of heme (the central component) or hemoglobin itself.
And it's the main thing that keeps you alive when you lose blood and need a transfusion. It's the packed cells that contain the hemoglobin that you need for oxygen transfer.
Jehovah's witnesses know all about this because they cannot take another person's blood even if their lives depend on it. Synthetic blood substitutes have investigated for years but they are still not in general use.
So hemoglobin - essentially the essence of the blood of life - is the holy grail of medicine. Yet it hasn't been possible to synthesise in quantities needed. It's just too difficult.
So, Rachel was working at Impossible Foods from 2012. Hmmm. She must have been quite young. A new post doc.
Who has just invented the holy grail of medicine?
I dunno, maybe the picture is wrong. Let's try google. Oh. Seems to be "Impossible" to find a good one...
Anyway, let's look on Pubmed. Remember that any major achievement in science is preceded by years of attempts. Very few things happen overnight despite what Bancel and Sahin might say.
This is an interesting article.
Some big hitters, even recruited from the NIH.
NIH?
Oh yes. The same NIH that funds @fredhutch and the Wuhan Institute of virology.
Nothing to see here. archive.ph/wip/1Dvdo
So, what is "soyleghemoglobin"?
Who knows, because the only people that can tell you are the people that supposedly made it. In the windowless offices across the road from Planned Parenthood.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
Here is the clip from the (decent) interview with Pelle Neroth Taylor of @RealTNTRadio.
In it Boyle is asked whether the mRNA vaccines are themselves biological weapons and he explains that because "in your system, it generates the COVID-19 cells" they would be.
But of course that's incorrect, because mRNA vaccines don't recreate the COVID virus (the biological weapon - assuming as we now know that it was synthetic not natural).
So his explanation was incorrect because he misunderstood that the mRNA only provides the spike protein and he would have been destroyed on this point in court.
Of course he never got to court. And never gave an affidavit for the Dutch court - confirmed here (8/3/25):
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.