If India were a secular state, ex-Muslims would be safe, anyone could criticize any “prophet” and Hindu temples wouldn’t be taxed and schemes funded for non-Hindus.
But it isn’t secular. India is a de facto sharia state.
But it isn’t secular. India is a de facto sharia state.
Naturally. The Islamic Sharia State of India is obligated to aid in the demographic war of true believers.
This is why the age of marriage for kaffirs is raised to the highest in the world.
This is why the age of marriage for kaffirs is raised to the highest in the world.
https://twitter.com/pgurus1/status/1538877205161582592
Lol, blasphemy itself is a #ChristoIslamic concept.
It has no relevance in a secular state nor in an Indic one.
It has no relevance in a secular state nor in an Indic one.
https://twitter.com/avinashgoswami_/status/1539346595543928832
Problem is that we have been so thoroughly colonized that we don’t even understand that blasphemy is a #ChristoIslamic idea.
“Being primarily a sin of the tongue, it will be seen to be opposed directly to the religious act of praising God. (2)”
newadvent.org/cathen/02595a.…
“Being primarily a sin of the tongue, it will be seen to be opposed directly to the religious act of praising God. (2)”
newadvent.org/cathen/02595a.…
Yes secularism also emerges from Christianity. We need Indic pluralism.
But this is for those who cry for “secularism” in India but create a sharia state.
But this is for those who cry for “secularism” in India but create a sharia state.
https://twitter.com/jitu1621/status/1539357209309892608
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
