A table of frequency of certain keywords across 6 shaiva-tantra-s. For each text the 1st column is absolute count; 2nd is rank (ties randomly broken); 3rd is frequency relative to the most frequent word. This provides insights into the post-vaidika evolution of the tradition
The 1st text is uDDAmareshvara, TMK, the best preserved of the extant DAmara tantra-s. It shows a clear dominance of rudra, an absence of sadAshiva & the other names being roughly equally distributed. This is closer to the vaidika name space& it shows mantra-s of an archaic form
that are reminiscent & in some cases directly related the those from the uchChuShma-rudra-kalpa of the atharvan tradition. Thus, it may be inferred to be from an early stratum of the shaiva tradition. The 2nd text is the svachChanda tantra, a dakShiNa-shaiva text. It is marked
by the meteoric rise of 'shiva', used in a placatory or euphemistic sense in the shruti for rudra. However, after shiva is rudra which indicates its still visible connections to the old tradition. The 3rd most prevalent name is bhairava, marking the rise of the bhairava-srotas of
which the svachChanda is an early exemplar. Also apparent here is the emerging presence of the name 'sadAshiva'. The 3rd text is the netra-tantra centered around the worship of the post-Vedic ectype of tryambaka, amR^iteshvara. Here, too shiva dominates but rudra recedes into the
background. However, what is notable here is the rise of the name 'yoginI', which existed at low frequency in the previous 2 texts. It marks the rise of the yoginI-centric system impinging on an otherwise shambhu-para tradition. The 4th text is the troTalA, a pUrvasrotas text
centered on the goddess tvaritA, one of whose visualizations was avicephalic with an adamantine beak (vajratuNDA). She is also called shakradUtI hearkening to gAyatrI in the shruti. Here the situation is similar to the netra but 'bhairava' is infrequent indicating that the
goddess-oriented tradition of pUrvasrotas branched off separately from the comparable ones associated with the dakShiNasrotas. The 5th text is the kaulaj~nAna-nirNaya (name mangled in table) of the yuganAtha, the yogin of the current age, the fisherman siddha matsyendra. Here the
most frequent word is 'yoginI' followed by 'bhairava'. Rest of the names other than 'shiva' recede into the background. This marks the transition of the bhairava-srotas into the yoginI-oriented kaula tradition. It was 1 of the early kaula texts following a system of a multitude
of yoginI-s (usually 64 or more) rather than a single or a few (typically 3, 9 or 16) focal goddesses of the directional AMnAya-s; e.g., kAlI-s, nityA-s, the trikA goddesses, mAlinI, kubjikA, tripurA, guhyakAlI. That leads us to the 6th text, the hAhArava, 1 of the root tantra-s
of the uttarAMnAya's guhyakAlI tradition focused on the glorious therocephalic goddess guhyakAlI. She may manifest in a 3 headed form where the 3 heads are 1. trailokyaDAmarA -- indicating her link to the DAmara-tantra-s; 2. matachakreshvarI -- the classic kAlI; 3. matalakShmI --
indicating her connection to the the vaiShNava kAlI mAdhaveshvarI of the yAmala tantra-s. Alternatively she manifests in 10-headed form with elephant, eagle, human (fierce), crocodile, horse, ape, jackal, boar, lion&
human (charming) heads which encompass the the other AmnAya-s
e.g., the hAhArava states the fair elephant head embodies pratya~NgirA; the black horse head the root trika goddess siddhayogeshvarI; the red ape face kubjikA of the pashchimAMnAya & the smoky boar face trilokyaDAmarA of the DAmara-tantra-s & the dark jackal face kAlasaMkarShanI
The hAhArava shows the clear predominance of bhairava & a high frequency of 'yoginI', indicating its still present connection as a kaula text to bhairava-srotas roots. There are some subtle features though: mahAkAla is more prominent than the rare nandin in this text. Tradition
presents the guhyakAlI & several other uttarAMnAya traditions are the teachings of mahAkAla-rudra. gaNesha is more common than skanda: indicates it is later than the other texts. The rise in frequency of DAkinI -- otherwise present only at low frequency -- is an inheritance from
the old DAmara-tantra-s that came to prominence in this & related kaula texts. Finally, the surprising feature of this text is the frequency of (tri)shUla -- rank 2 -- guhyakAlI was visualized as prominently brandishing this weapon. This likely hints the uttarAMnAya roots of the
trident-wielding goddess shUlinI -- a feature inherited from the ancient kShetra of chAmuNDA: manasataramgini.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/on-…
गुह्यकाली महाकाली भद्रकालि सुमंगला ।
भद्रा भद्रेश्वरी भीमा भीषणा भैरव-प्रिया ॥
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@huntersrolinson In late antiquity many IE groups (India, Iran, Armenia, Germania, Rome to degree) converged to a triad (trimUrti) of "primary" deities. The Armenian one is given as Aramazd, Anahit, and Vahagn. It is not identical to the Iranic one despite the Iranic origin of the names. It seems
@huntersrolinson the Iranic names were superimposed onto the original Armenian ones. Thus, it may indeed be correct to assume that behind vahagn was the original Armenia indra-class deity. It also seems Armenians had a more typical, veda-like aindra religion distinct in its configuration from the
@huntersrolinson religion of core Zoroastrian one. This might have favored the easy establishment of the Indian dynasty in Armenia for a while (followed by Gregory's classically Abrahamistic crusade on H shrines in the region). However, on the other hand it might also suggest that in the more
The opening of the vrAtya-kANDa of the atharvaveda has elements that have continued to find expression through the history of the shaiva tradition. Here the prAjapatya& aindra flavors of the religion are incorporated within the early shaiva framework of the vrata. The primal
vrAtya is to be understood as rudra himself &when he manifests specifically as nIlalohita-rudra who in the paurANika tradition beheads the 5th head of prajApati. But again note the verb sam-Ir, which is used to indicate the primal vrAtya (rudra) animating prajApati. The same root
is behind a name of vAyu; also note its use in the taittirIya-shruti to describe a comparable activity of vAyu: वायुर् नक्षत्रम् अभ्येति निष्ट्याम् । तिग्मशृङ्गो वृषभो रोरुवाणः । *समीरयन् भुवना मातरिश्वा* । अप द्वेषाँसि नुदताम् अरातीः ॥
This again points to that old connection
An interesting development in Indian archaeology has been the revisiting of the funerary stone jars from Assam. They were 1st noticed & classified by English archaeologists over 90 years ago. Subsequently, another English worker Bower recorded the Nagas raiding them for beads
In the past decade, they were reinvestigated by Thakuria who has given a detailed account of them & found them to be comparable to large stone jars from Laos. What links Laos & Assam are the Southwestern Tai languages, a branch of the Tai-Kadai family. Another language family
shared by NE India & Laos is Austroasiatic but we suspect these stone jars are more likely associated with the Tai expansion than the Austroasiatic expansion. Many of these jars are made from hard stone that needed a hard metal chisel for working them. Thakuria found chisel marks
Throughout the IE world the iconography of the vajra (or cognate) is three-pronged: early on in the Anatolian world, then Greece, then India& Rome. We have held that this is an IE feature even though the RV calls it shataparvan among other things. But in the jaiminIya brAhmaNa it
is clearly mentioned as three-pronged. Thus, we have a vaidika author AruNi clearly recognize this form approximately coeval with Anatolian depictions suggesting that it was indeed an old IE conception of the weapon. A coin of Marcos Aurelios with Jupiter with 3-pronged weapon
This also brings to mind the famous AV (vulgate) incantation of the secret atharvan weapon, triShaMdhi, which can be interpreted as 3-pronged: e.g.,
अयोमुखाः सूचीमुखा अथो विकङ्कतीमुखाः ।
क्रव्यादो वातरंहस आ सजन्त्व् अमित्रान् वज्रेण त्रिषन्धिना ॥
These Konkan petroglyphs should be receiving much more archaeological attention than they do. 1 puzzling feature is the presence of the "Master of the animals" motif. Multiple exemplars of this motif are seen across Egypt, West Asia and the Harappan India from ~6000-3500 YBP
The date of these Konkan sites is unknown. Several people have thrown around dates like 10-12000 YBP. However, none of these dates are in any way reliable. If true it would mean that the earliest example of the MoA motif is from these Konkan sites & may be it spread from there to
North Africa& West Asia. However, so far we see no conclusive evidence in support of those dates. On the other hand they are associated with the megalithic stone circles. In our youth we have seen such circles& nearby simpler petroglyphs. This might suggest that the petroglyphs
The sprawling jaiminIya brAhmaNa of the sAmaveda has a section which we would call an upaniShat even though it is not widely taught as such in uttaramImAMsA traditions. After starting with a prAjApatya element it presents the following verse. The object of this verse is connected
units of time, the days, nights, forthnights, months, year & 12 days intercalary difference between 12 synodic moon cycles & the solar year. The 12 months are listed & finally the 2 intercalary months for the saMvatsara cycle. This then concludes with a statement to reconcile the
prAjApatya and aindra strands of the religion:
य एष तपत्य् एष इन्द्र एष प्रजापतिर् एष एवेदं सर्वम् इत्य् उपासितव्यम् ।
it is finally termed sarva. The connection with the realm measured by the thousand pillars, the units of time & terms sarva itself present this meditation as the