If you take Sotomayor's reasoning to the full extent, every religous based outfit can never participate in the public square fully. If you are atheist, you can.
This was always an obvious violation of the 1st amendment. Sotomayor blew it.
The state cannot bar religious outfits from participating in public programs any more than they can block anyone else.
Sotomayor would make a SPECIAL class of believers (religious) that are excluded.
Religion was never supposed to be separated from the public square.
Government always has the choice to stop spending the money at all.
But as long as they are spending, they can't exclude you ONLY because you believe in a faith system.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“I think they can smell me,” she said. “And that makes me feel so special.”
"Looking at her daughters, Brooke struggled to articulate her feelings on abortion. On one hand, she said, she absolutely believed women should have the right to choose what’s best for their own lives. On the other, without the Texas law, her babies might not be here."
Klein: "...@nicholas_bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan. In “The Procedure Fetish,” Bagley argues that liberal governance has developed a puzzling preference for legitimating government action through processes rather than outcomes..."
“Legitimacy is not solely — not even primarily — a product of procedures that agencies follow...Legitimacy arises more generally from the perception that government is capable, informed, prompt, responsive, and fair.”
I'm fine with this proposal from Nathaniel Glasser and @haroldpollack.
But as a society, we need to decide what age people have full constitutional rights. If that age needs to be raised, I am all ears. But you shouldn't get to pick and choose. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/0…
As for guns, I almost universally agree with their arguments here, actually. I don't think 18 year olds are mature enough to be handling guns without supervision.
Of course, I am an old fart, and I am not even sure 18 year olds should be driving, drinking, smoking etc...
Most murders are commited by those 18-24 (About 34%), while 25-35 is 28.4%.
"These results persisted when using regression methods to control for differences across districts. Interpretation: School districts that choose to mandate masks are likely to be systematically different from those that do not in multiple, often unobserved, ways."
"Failed to establish relationship between school masking and cases...demonstrates that observational studies of interventions with small effect sizes are prone to bias caused by selection and omitted variables. Randomized studies can more reliably inform public health policy. :
What are the options? I think we start with 3 main options:
1. Marginal Gun Control 2. Absolutist Gun Control; Repeal #2A 3. Gun Expansion 4. Status Quo
The Marginal/Minimalist plan would limit the type of guns available.
The absolutist would be making guns illegal and confiscation.
Gun expansion would allow more freely carry gun laws.
#1 is the majority position among the Democrat Party. Unfortunately, its been tried before (Brady bill), and didn't really work all that well. Several studies have shown that it didn't reduce homicides at all (it did help reduce suicides).