WRONG.

The government saying religious beliefs BLOCKS people from participating in government UNDERMINES the separation of church and state.

The STATE is barred from isolating religious beliefs. Sotomayor ignores that.
If you take Sotomayor's reasoning to the full extent, every religous based outfit can never participate in the public square fully. If you are atheist, you can.

This was always an obvious violation of the 1st amendment. Sotomayor blew it.
The state cannot bar religious outfits from participating in public programs any more than they can block anyone else.

Sotomayor would make a SPECIAL class of believers (religious) that are excluded.

Religion was never supposed to be separated from the public square.
Government always has the choice to stop spending the money at all.

But as long as they are spending, they can't exclude you ONLY because you believe in a faith system.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pradheep J. Shanker

Pradheep J. Shanker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Neoavatara

Jun 21
So, so many people didn't read or understand the totality of this story.

Maybe you believe abortion should be legal... And that's fine. But this story certainly isn't a tragedy... It's hopeful and positive and glorious.
"Somehow, mothering came naturally to Brooke.

“I think they can smell me,” she said. “And that makes me feel so special.”
"Looking at her daughters, Brooke struggled to articulate her feelings on abortion. On one hand, she said, she absolutely believed women should have the right to choose what’s best for their own lives. On the other, without the Texas law, her babies might not be here."
Read 6 tweets
May 30
The problem is many progressive policies inherently prevent such building.

For example:
1. Increasing labor costs.
2. Demanding public sector unions.
3. Limiting energy access.
4. Legal barriers.
Klein: "...@nicholas_bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan. In “The Procedure Fetish,” Bagley argues that liberal governance has developed a puzzling preference for legitimating government action through processes rather than outcomes..."
“Legitimacy is not solely — not even primarily — a product of procedures that agencies follow...Legitimacy arises more generally from the perception that government is capable, informed, prompt, responsive, and fair.”
Read 6 tweets
May 29
It seems the Left has basically adopted, as their position, that the 2nd amendment does not guarantee an individual's right to bear arms.

This is why the Left keeps failing. First, it is an intellectually flawed position. Second, why should gun advocates compromise with that?
Basically, if you want compromise (and I do!), you have to start with two basic tenets:

1. The 2nd amendment does guarantee an individual's right to bear arms.

2. The 2nd amendment (as Scalia noted in Heller) does not mean you cannot have reasonable regulation.
The Left is rejecting #1, and then blaming everyone for the failure to get solutions.

There are many on the Right that reject #2, but they are a MINORITY of Republicans.
Read 4 tweets
May 29
I'm fine with this proposal from Nathaniel Glasser and @haroldpollack.

But as a society, we need to decide what age people have full constitutional rights. If that age needs to be raised, I am all ears. But you shouldn't get to pick and choose.
washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/0…
As for guns, I almost universally agree with their arguments here, actually. I don't think 18 year olds are mature enough to be handling guns without supervision.

Of course, I am an old fart, and I am not even sure 18 year olds should be driving, drinking, smoking etc...
Most murders are commited by those 18-24 (About 34%), while 25-35 is 28.4%.
Read 5 tweets
May 29
From @TracyBethHoeg and @AChandra_TO :

"Incorporating a larger sample and longer period showed NO SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MASK MANDATES AND CASE RATES."

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
"These results persisted when using regression methods to control for differences across districts. Interpretation: School districts that choose to mandate masks are likely to be systematically different from those that do not in multiple, often unobserved, ways."
"Failed to establish relationship between school masking and cases...demonstrates that observational studies of interventions with small effect sizes are prone to bias caused by selection and omitted variables. Randomized studies can more reliably inform public health policy. :
Read 4 tweets
May 28
So, here is my logic on guns, gun control:

What are the options? I think we start with 3 main options:

1. Marginal Gun Control
2. Absolutist Gun Control; Repeal #2A
3. Gun Expansion
4. Status Quo
The Marginal/Minimalist plan would limit the type of guns available.

The absolutist would be making guns illegal and confiscation.

Gun expansion would allow more freely carry gun laws.
#1 is the majority position among the Democrat Party. Unfortunately, its been tried before (Brady bill), and didn't really work all that well. Several studies have shown that it didn't reduce homicides at all (it did help reduce suicides).

web.archive.org/web/2012123121…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(