Justin Alexander Profile picture
Jun 21, 2022 26 tweets 7 min read Read on X
In its own words, DL3 Dragons of Hope "involves leading 800 refugees ... through the wilderness to safety" after the Pax Tharkas prison break at the end of DL2.

When I talk about the #Dragonlance Saga daring to dream big and do stuff you'd never seen before in a D&D adventure... Image
...this is what I'm talking about.

And, yes, I recognize that "escort the refugee caravan" is bog standard now.

But DL3 nevertheless remains impressive.
We're continuing our Let's Read of the #Dragonlance Saga!

Jump over here if you'd like to begin from the beginning.

DL3 includes mechanics for:
- Supply
- Attrition
- Combat (since the refugees are being pursued by a dragonarmy)

Plus a political mini-game with the PCs negotiating/collaborating with the refugee leadership.
It's a very effective way of cranking up the stakes.

Which is impressive, honestly, because the Saga has already done a pretty great job of setting high stakes.

The first adventure was "return the True Gods to the world," after all.
The other way in which the Saga has been establishing its epic sweep is the vast world it traverses.

LOTR, Belgariad, Shannara. The genre is all about touring the world, and DL3 uses the refugee's flight to continue opening up new territory. Image
The challenge, of course, is prepping this.

And so the landscape here is carefully designed to funnel the PCs and refugees alike towards the ancient dwarven city of Thorbardin, which has been sealed and "lost" for over three centuries.
(Impassable mountains will become a common theme in the Saga.)
You can get a good feel for the scope of this first act of the #Dragonlance Saga by looking at the Lands of Abansynia map.

This map unified the maps found in DL1, DL2, and DL3 into a single poster map. (Which has been completely redrawn for, in some cases, the third time.) Image
One odd feature of this map is that DL1 (in the north) and DL3 (in the south) used a region-based keying method.

DL2 (in the middle) did not.

So this map includes a bunch of regions in the north that kind of trail off indeterminately into the middle section around Qualinesti.
And then the regions abruptly begin again south of Pax Tharkas.
It's a strange affect. Particularly because this appears to be intended as a player map.

On the plus side, it's A LOT easier to make out the red-bordered regions than when they were indicated using black lines on top of black hexes on top of black terrain in DL1.
Although DL1 and DL3 both use region-keyed hex maps (a technique I don't recall seeing elsewhere), their actual function is very different in Dragons of Hope.
I discuss this in more detail over here, but the short version is that DL3 works much more like what we would now refer to as a pointcrawl.

thealexandrian.net/wordpress/4800…
In region 3, for example, you can clearly see that you're not navigating by hex: You're picking the road or the pass. To the south, the way branc...
And if you follow that to region 5, you get a choice between "several canyons" (north, east, three to the south). 5. SPIRE The canyon opens i...
The hexes are becoming a vestigial structure.

In region 13, for example, the glacier breaks away beneath the PCs' feet and they go careening down the chute-like region 14 before getting dumped into Area 18.
This is written as a fast, dramatic moment. But, as you can see, region 14 is actually 8 or 9 miles long. Image
This becomes an unintentional Moment of Awesome, though, because I'm forced to imagine this entire sequence as a Monty Oum video.

The funnel eventually leads the PCs to Skullcap, an ancient dwarven fortress (i.e., dungeon) that contains a map leading to Thorbardin. Image
Skullcap is under-hooked: There's a single NPC in a different dungeon that can tell the PCs that Skullcap might have such a map.
If the PCs don't run into that NPC (more than possible), there's no coherent reason for them to jump into Skullcap other than the meta-expectation that you should go into every dungeon.
Once you're in Skullcap, the dungeon looks very good.

Hmm... Verticality.

Jaquaying... yesssssss. Image
And the dungeon key is steeped with lots of rich, detailed lore.

If your players are anything like mine, they're going to be thrilled to be peeling back the layers on long-lost history; revealing enigmas forgotten to this younger age.
Hickman, as he has so many times before, reveals himself to be an absolute master of the dungeon. Image
The Let's Read continues over here!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Alexander

Justin Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hexcrawl

Jun 7
Hypothesis: The beholder's mouth gets larger with each new edition.

Let's start with the original 1975 appearance on the cover of Supplement I: Greyhawk. Image
Okay, let's compare AD&D 1E (Tom Wham) to AD&D 2E (Jeff Easley).

Here I think you could argue that the 1E beholder has a wider mouth, but I definitely think the 2E has more maw.
Image
Image
Now AD&D 2E (Jeff Easley) to D&D 3E (Scott Fischer).

Bigger teeth. Bigger mouth.
Beholder, AD&D 2e (Jeff Easley)
Behlder, D&D 3e (Scott Fischer)
Read 9 tweets
Jan 22
This article was removed because it was attracting transphobes and its original purpose was also defunct.

Core claims from the article and the discussion at the time it was written:

1. You shouldn't deadname people.
2. However, the ethics of re-editing material written before a name change is complicated.

3. If Jennell requested a change to the original article, I would change it.

(She did, and I did.)
For better or for worse, I stand by those claims.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 22
I have been asked to respond to this post.

Short version: The post is not only lying about what I said, it's also wrong about what Jennell said and what Jennell's wife has said.

diyanddragons.blogspot.com/2024/01/xander…
For one example completely out of my control, the post claims Jennell's wife said she was in a coma on November 1st in the GoFundMe updates.

You can go look: That's not true.

(Make a donation while you're there.)

gofundme.com/f/jennell-jaqu…
The post is, IMO, deceptive in countless ways, for example by claiming that my descriptions of private messaging in the spring of 2023 is actually describing a public comment on a deleted blog post from 2018.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
When I did theater, we would periodically run into "my significant other is uncomfortable with my character (me) kissing someone onstage."

Never once had someone's significant other get concerned about their significant other getting stabbed or haunted by a ghost on stage.
Remove the script and the formality of the stage and... well...
I'm not even saying "it's because people will get concerned." I'm saying human emotion is complicated and personal comfort with emotion, particularly in Puritanical America, is varied.
Read 16 tweets
Jun 19, 2023
Re: 5E DMG. #dnd

A lot is made of chapter order (start by creating a pantheon of gods!). That's easy to point to, but is really only representative of the more fundamental problem:

The designers didn't have a clear vision for the structure of play. Cover of 5E Dungeon Master'...
So there's a bunch of stuff, but very little of it is actually connected to any clear function. It seems mostly sourced from other D&D books and a vague sense that this is "cool" or "should be there."

Which makes it tough for the reader to come to grips with it.
It's like a hoarder's garage. If you dig through it, you're occasionally like, "Holy crap! There's a 3D printer in here!"

The print head is missing and you'll need to track down some filament before you can use it, but... 3D printer! Wow!
Read 6 tweets
Jan 20, 2023
OGL 1.2 survey is live.

survey.alchemer.com/s3/7182208/OGL…  1. Would you like to provide feedback on the content of the
Well... a lot, actually. 2. Now that you've read the proposed OGL 1.2, what concerns
But here's my tight response:

Attempting to de-authorize the OGL is simply unacceptable. I will not purchase anything from Hasbro if you persist in this extra-legal act of cultural vandalism.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(