0/n
Politicians, normies and MSM-pundits call #Bitcoin "Virtual Money", but it is actually the VERY OPPOSITE of that!

Bitcoin is really a huge step in the process of (RE-)DE-VIRTUALIZATION of Money!

The process of money virtualization had already started very long ago.
👇🧵
1/n
The first step of money virtualization was COINAGE. Money was still a physical token, but its market value was often driven by INFORMATION printed on it, more then by metal content (especially when political power mandated that, or when people didn't independently verify).
👇
2/n
The second step of money virtualization was SEIGNIORAGE, where the increasingly huge, long-term decoupling between face-value and metal-value of coins (before just due to accident or fraud) was accepted and normalized as the typical business model for the coinage provider.
👇
3/n
The third step of money virtualization was CUSTODY. Money was not a physical token anymore, it had instead become INFORMATION support (banknotes) used to represent it and (hopefully) redeem it. But there still was some level of reality behind the representation: reserves.
👇
4/n
The fourth step of money virtualization was FRB, where the increasingly huge, long-term decoupling between circulating banknotes and actual reserves (before just due to accident or fraud) was accepted and normalized as the typical business model for the custody provider.
👇
5/n
The fifth step of money virtualization was FIAT MONEY, where the redeeming was "suspended" (as a "temporarily" measure, of course🤭🤫), turning money into pure INFORMATION, conveyed by physical bearer instruments, without any residual connection with physical commodities.
👇
6/n
The sixth and last step of money virtualization was DIGITAL FIAT, where even physical bearer instruments were gradually restricted, moving INFORMATION to identity-based central ledgers. Increasing censorship and exclusion, and decreasing costliness for monetary expansion.
👇
7/n (n=7)

It may come to you as a surprise, but...well...BITCOIN FIXES THIS!

#Bitcoin effectively DE-VIRTUALIZES money, completing the cycle, bringing it back to physical scarcity (difficulty-adjusted PoW) and bearer control (private cryptographic keys).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Giacomo NoCAT Zucco⚡️🌋🧀💀🧻

Giacomo NoCAT Zucco⚡️🌋🧀💀🧻 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @giacomozucco

Oct 8
@sgrettolatore @robertdenico1 Abbastanza d'accordo con voi in generale. Un ascolto comunque interessante, grazie del tag. Provo a mettere giù un po' di punti specifici in modo schematico sperando di non essere troppo prolisso.
...
...
1 METODO
Al di là del merito, il metodo di Hoppe mi piace: è come sempre molto analitico e lucido nel mettere in fila le argomentazioni in modo chiaro e distinto. Premette che il suo è un giudizio "da lontano" e non conosce bene la situazione argentina. Specifica che il suo "diritto" di critica viene soprattutto da il fatto di essere citato (con il suo mentore) come ispirazione principale da Milei, il che cambia il contesto del discorso. Chiarisce alla fine che comunque preferisce Milei ad altri, cosa che salva la critica dal trasformarsi in una Nirvana fallacy totale. Ci sta.
...
...
2 MERITO POLITICA INTERNA
Ci sta abbastanza, anche se la critica sarebbe più potente e completa se incorporasse anche due attenuanti e un chiarimento. La prima attenuante è che l'Argentina non è una monarchia assoluta dove Milei può fare tutto: c'è un governo di coalizione, un'opposizione parlamentare, un deep state burocratico/militare, un'opposizione sociale/culturale/sindacale/economica/finanziaria nel paese, interferenze geopolitiche esterne, etc. Ovviamente la contro-obiezione è che "non dovresti promettere cose se non puoi mantenerle", ma citare queste frizioni secondo me era dovuto.
...
Read 10 tweets
Jul 28
Just finished to watch the full Trump speech at the Shitcoin Magazine conference.


A thread:👇🧵
1) First of all I hate to have to admit it was both a very entertaining show and a quite relevant piece of Bitcoin history for the ages. As much as I like to give Shitcoin Magazine's scammer shit (which I think they 100% deserve), this was funny, interesting, consequential, huge...an unmitigated success for their conference. I'm still glad I was not there in person to get my biological cavities searched by Secred Service fags, but I did watch it on YouTube, and I think you should too. Kudos to my enemies, when it's due.
2) The speech starts with a reference to the recent attack in Israel. It was a bit weird, admittedly. Not because of the content (my position on the conflict is admittedly a bit convoluted and changing over time, and I'm not going to open that can of worms here, if not to say that the best geopolitical statement in Trump's speech has been about rejecting the traditional perpetual war policy, which is good, and partially consistent with his own time in office), but because it felt forced, off-mood, disconnected, a bit random. But I guess he had to comment on it, since it happened shortly before.
Read 19 tweets
Oct 8, 2022
@MichaelRoerade @BTCJSON1 @Anthony16438428 No, I'd say there's a strict thread model difference:

1) Azteco/BATM: shop owner *may* record your face on security cameras, register the gift card id, connect the two (plus cash serial numbers in extreme cases) and pass the intelligence to the attacker: very low probab.;

...
@MichaelRoerade @BTCJSON1 @Anthony16438428 ...

2) Bisq/Robosats: each individual seller learns for sure an identifiable fiat bank/fintech ID, which *may* be yours (or maybe of your relative/friend/client/local hobo, no strict check, you can use different ones), and he *may* record it and give it to the attacker;

...
@MichaelRoerade @BTCJSON1 @Anthony16438428 ...

3) Hodlhodl/Relai: each individual seller and the platform learn identifiable fiat bank/fintech IDs, which *may* be yours (or maybe of your relative/friend/client/local hobo, no strict check, you can use different ones), and the platform is legally required to keep it;

...
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26, 2022
@_joerodgers @mir_btc @GiorgiaMeloni Traditionally she comes from the "Social Right", which is the most statist part of the post-fascist (thus pretty much statist, even if at least anticommunist) Italian right. Her economic statism is still the same in absolute terms, but since every single other party and ...
@_joerodgers @mir_btc @GiorgiaMeloni ... politician, globally but particularly in Italy, moved towards full communism in the last 30 years, she look almost mildly pro-free-market by comparison. Vocally pro-regulation, pro-spending, pro-deficit, pro-debt, thus implicitly pro-fiat, but almost "anti-tax" if compared...
@_joerodgers @mir_btc @GiorgiaMeloni ...with most other parties. Culturally conservative, thus opposed to the SJW bullshit invasion coming from the States, but not particularly brave or insightful on that side either (common sense opposition to cultural Marxism, nothing extremely "based"). The worst traits are ...
Read 7 tweets
Aug 9, 2022
Bitcoin is not dead nor dying: it's stronger than ever. Bitcoin Maximalism is not dead nor dying: it's stronger then ever.

But my thesis is that the average quality of article about "the Death of Bitcoin Maximalism" is slowly dying. Look at this increasingly cringe obituaries:
Second "antima" wave (2021/2022):

June 2021:
breedlove22.substack.com/p/freedom-from…
June 2022:
medium.com/@nic__carter/s…
July 2022:
pourteaux.substack.com/p/bitcoin-cult…

There's space for a couple more, before the end of this quadrennial menstrual period. But it's impressive to flip through them in sequence:
Read 5 tweets
Jul 3, 2022
Most long-term Blbitcoiners are too tired to engage with this bullshit again, but for the one of you new around here: "PoS" is logically broken (specifically: circular), as explained to Wei Dai in 1998 and as definitely crystalized by Andrew Poelstra here:
diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2…
Specifically: a method to vote about the current transactional chronology which uses as a weight the current transactional chronology has literally "nothing at stake": it can only work assuming centralized checkpoints, either in code or in social circles ("weak subjectivity").
Since this flaw has made been quite clear in 1998 already (even if not in such a clear, concise & complete way as in the Poelstra paper linked in OP), Nakamoto had to introduce PoW instead to fix it. Yes you read correctly: PoS is a broken 1998 proposal that PoW *fixed* in 2008!
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(