After a decade of working on it, my book is finally out with @OUPLaw.

The book argues that we have entered a new era: a backlash against #investment arbitration has given way to a backlash by arbitrators as new treaties produce old outcomes.🧵(1/9)

Intro oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/o…
The book (1) charters how states have reformed their investment treaties, (2) tracks how these reforms have been dulled or reversed in investment arbitration, & (3) suggests ways to shift the regime's centre of gravity from old to new treaties. (2/9)
Why spent 10 years on this? Because it was fun to write about but also because it is important.

States seeking to rebalancing investment protection with host state policy space have changed the law in the books, but not the law in action. (3/9)
States have spent 20ys reforming their investment treaties to correct deficiencies of older treaties.

Scholars and policymakers, placing high hopes on these reforms, expected them to rebalance outcomes in arbitration.

See S Spears writing in 2010:
academic.oup.com/jiel/article/1… (4/9)
However, the first set of arbitration awards under these reformed treaties suggests that little has changed in practice.

Take general exceptions to protect public health or the environment. They are a novelty in investment treaties, but have become common. (5/9)
Last year's Eco Oro decision had to make sense of such an exception and adopted an interpretation that, to quote @jbentonheath, "declar[ed] this provision to be effectively irrelevant in investment arbitration."

iisd.org/itn/en/2021/12… (6/9)
Eco Oro is not alone. In decision after decision, rebalanced treaties have run into an arbitral firewall.

This should not come as a surprise. José Alvarez, writing in 2011, suspected as much.
scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/268/ (7/9)
The book tries to explain and make sense of what is going on and suggests ways to ensure the success of state-driven reform. For now, I will stop here. If you want to read on, here is discount link to the book:
global.oup.com/academic/produ… (8/9)
This has been quite a journey. It would not have been possible without the support, mentorship and friendship of @JoostPauwelyn @AntheaERoberts @laugepoulsen @ElisabethTuerk @DianaRosert @taylor__stjohn @nicolas_lamp @manfredelsig @LawProfPuig and many others. Thank you! (9/9)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wolfgang Alschner

Wolfgang Alschner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @w_alschner

Sep 15, 2021
After being off Twitter for the summer to finish my book "New Treaties, Old Outcomes" on how new-generation investment treaties are interpreted like old ones, this is the first tweet I see. 👇

Well, I'll have to add a couple of new paragraphs to the manuscript... 🧵
The Eco Oro award beautifully proves the book's point.

The case is based on the Canada-Colombia FTA, a new treaty with general exception. Article 2201(3) shields environmental measures from liability under strict conditions even when they violate the Investment Chapter. Image
Yet, the tribunal ignored this explicit hierarchy (environment > investment) and reproduced the reasoning of past awards rendered under agreements without exceptions that states must protect the environment while observing investment commitments. Image
Read 10 tweets
Feb 4, 2020
My paper on "The OECD Multilateral Tax Instrument: A Model for Reforming The International Investment Regime?" is out in the Brooklyn J. of Int'l Law:
brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol45/iss…

It has been quite a journey... (thread)
The international tax regime turns out to be fascinating - with many parallels to the international investment regime. Yet, few have written about the two comparatively, with @rpolancolazo @JoostPauwelyn @JChaisse being notable exceptions.
Some of the "gems" I came across was a 1974 article by Charles Irish. His argument that developing states stumbled into tax treaties without understanding their risks and benefits mirrors @laugepoulsen masterful work on BITs decades later.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(