Scott Lemieux Profile picture
Jun 24, 2022 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
A non-celebratory thread with some of the most important points from the dissent -- it is no consolation that it is well done, but it is very clear-eyed about the radical implications of a fundamental right being crushed and this is worth highlighting ImageImage
Anyone who says that Dobbs "sends the issue back to the states" is flatly lying. Under the majority's reasoning, a national ban on abortion from conception with no exceptions would be constitutional Image
Alito's repeated assertions that overruling Roe does not threaten any of the other privacy cases should not be taken seriously. The logic of the holding threatens them all, and Alito is a known liar on the subject Image
It is, as the dissent observes, remarkable that Alito cites the common law prohibition on abortion *after* quickening as a point in favor of overruling Roe. THAT'S THE HOLDING IN ROE! Image
Perhaps the most important point in the dissent. "Originalism," as practiced by the Republican majority, ipso facto means treating women as second-class citizens, as they were when the 14th Amendment was ratified ("by men.") Image
If the majority's theory that the 14st Amendment must be interpreted as it was generally understood when it was ratified, then Loving v. Virginia was wrongly decided. That's a simple fact. Image
"And liberty may require it, this Court has repeatedly
said, even when those living in 1868 would not have recognized the claim—because they would not have seen the person making it as a full-fledged member of the community"
"Think of someone telling you that the Jenga tower simply will not collapse." Image
Distinguishing Roe from the other privacy precedents is just an ipse dixit: "if the majority is right in its legal analysis, all those decisions were wrong, and all those matters properly belong to the States too—whatever the particular state interests involved." Image
"As a matter of constitutional method, the majority’s commitment to replicate in 2022 every view about the meaning of liberty held in 1868 has precious little to recommend it."
I will quote less from the stare decisis passages because I think Roe stands on its own, but Coney Barrett's "but you can drop the baby off at the fire station!" argument is given the quick, contemptuous dismissal it merits Image
Another very important point: "health outcomes in
Mississippi are abysmal for both women and children." And thinking that red states that ban abortion will suddenly decide to provide more assistance to mothers and children is pure fantasy ImageImage
"a state-by-state analysis by public health professionals shows that States with the most restrictive abortion policies also continue to invest the least in women’s and
children’s health."
Very glad to see the dissent point out that the claim (not just the majority but way too many poorly informed pundits) that the U.S. was some kind of outlier on abortion policy is nonsense that requires willful ignorance about how abortion law in Europe actually works in practice ImageImage
This response to the majority's invocation of Brown is devastating: "if the Brown Court had used the majority’s method of constitutional construction, it might not ever have overruled Plessy, whether 5 or 50 or 500 years later." Image
Alito's opinion is shoddy hackwork from beginning to end, but as one of my students pointed out last quarter, bless her, its discussion of the reliance interests created by Roe is particularly weak and revealing ImageImageImage
"Women have relied on Roe and Casey in this way for 50 years. Many have never known anything else. When Roe and Casey disappear, the loss of power, control, and dignity will be immense."
A useful reminder that the cynical liar Sam Alito asserted that the Court was not allowing Texas to nullify Roe v. Wade, which should strongly inform how we view his bare assertions that the logic of this holding will not be applied to any other line of doctrine Image
In conclusion, Dobbs is bad law that will have horrible consequences, and is the product of a minority faction having seized a Supreme Court supermajority despite its failure to persuade the public of its views. The Court's legitimacy with the public will continue to erode. Image
And, yeah, fuck every last one of the fancy liberal lawyers who knowingly supported this outcome, whatever they may try to tell you now

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Lemieux

Scott Lemieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LemieuxLGM

Jun 9, 2023
Trying to retcon Trump as a whistleblower is amazing stuff even for Glenn
"James Comey was in the tank for Hillary Clinton" ROFL. Glenn really should reconsider the "tweeting about dogs in Portuguese" approach to days when something bad happens for his political side Image
One point to add is that it was incredibly stupid of Comey to think his statement would help clarify why Clinton wasn't indicted (i.e. because nobody ever has been for comparable conduct.) Inevitably, the only message people got was "extremely careless" lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/how-ar…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 9, 2023
As Patrick Deneen is making the rounds with a new book generating credulous coverage for claims that "post-liberal" reactionaries are actually more egalitarian than liberals, keep this in mind:
The Biden administration is enacting exactly the kind of pro-labor, pro-domestic manufacturing, pro-environmental industrial policy Deneen and his allies claim to want, and they don't care at all: lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/the-re…
Instead, Deneen's actual friends and allies are all politicians who supported Trump's upper-class tax cuts and Trump's efforts to take healthcare away from tens of millions of people to pay for even more upper-class tax cuts: politico.com/news/magazine/… Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9, 2023
It’s worth noting that the only reason Trump is the first former president to be indicted is that Gerald Ford unwisely preempted them lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/its-th…
Ford's pardon was very unpopular -- indeed, it probably cost him re-election -- and should not be seen as establishing some kind of American constitutional tradition that former presidents should be above the law.
"at will" Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 8, 2023
Great achievements in Alabama neoconfederacy lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2023/06/great-…
Plainly, Alabama should never have panicked and brought in Vladimir Myshkin to start the second period
Meanwhile, in dissent Alito offers the “Martin Luther King’s entire career consisted of one speech which consisted of one sentence” school of statutory interpretation Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 7, 2023
They also don’t want you to know that book critics write more about Toni Morrison and Phillip Roth than Robert Ludlum, which is very odd given that the latter sold many more copies
It’s fine not to be interested in watching Succession, just say that rather than pretending to believe that there’s a prefect correlation between aesthetic quality/interest and popularity
Whatever popularism’s merits as a campaign strategy, a hard no in applying it to aesthetics
Read 8 tweets
Jun 3, 2023
Sean makes the smartest case for the "NHL playoffs are pretty much a random walk and we just have to accept it" theory, and as always this is worth reading, but I don't fully agree. Ultimately, the Stanley Cup is almost always won by a genuinely top-quality team
And I think if they win Florida (who had the best regular season record in the league last year and added a Hart finalist, albeit at substantial cost) qualifies, just as I think Boston was a very good team having a season where everything broke right rather than historically good
I also definitely think that despite the #8 seed the 11-2 Kings -- who were possession monsters after Sutter took over, made some critical additions, and of course won again with a similar roster two years later -- were genuinely outstanding
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(