🚨 🚨
🧵— Roe, the Laboratories of Autocracy Strategy (and how we fight it)
I hope this thread will change the way many of you see politics in today’s America. And how you engage.
It’s a tweet version of my book, and the presentation I give almost every night. Read on:
1/
It starts with this slide.
Most people think there is a single battle in politics in America. But I’ve come to the conclusion that the two sides are fighting such different battles, there are actually TWO battles. And for the most part, one side does not see that reality.
2/
The side on the left largely assumes democracy is intact, and understands that its political views are generally mainstream/popular, so this side’s political battle is about election outcomes.
Win elections based on your mainstream views, and you get what you want done.
3/
And because this side is efficient in pursuing its goal of winning elections, this side largely wages its battle for FEDERAL offices, in federal swing states & districts, in federal years.
When it wins those offices, this side celebrates, having won its political battle.
4/
This is also how the media generally covers American politics. It’s how Democrats, most independents, and even some Republicans think about politics too.
So what’s the other side’s battle?
Warning: it’s a very different battle.
1) It starts w the understanding that…
5/
…that Democracy is not stable. And that it can actually be subverted into minority rule. It happens in other countries. And it can happen in our country. This side gets this.
2) Critically, this side also understands ITS worldview is a minority/extreme worldview
6/
It understands that in a robust democracy, in repeated elections where most vote on a fair playing field, that it would NOT succeed. They know that their minority worldview, be it ending Roe, extreme gun laws, extreme trickle down economics, etc would not prevail
They’re right
So what do they do as a result? Do they quit?
No.
They simply adopt a different battle to get their worldview achieved.
As opposed to the other side‘s battle of securing election outcomes in a robust democracy, their battle becomes…a battle against democracy itself.
8/
BTW they don’t even hide this fact.
Billionaire Peter Thiel reflected the view when he wrote democracy and freedom are not compatible.
And CPAC made it very clear by having their convention in Hungary, where Orban has perfected subverting Democracy
So now that that’s their political battle, how do they wage it? In federal swing states in federal years?
Of course they want to win those races, but no, that’s not their prime front in their battle.
The main front in their battle is several rungs lower: statehouses.
10/
Why, you ask? Because it turns out, statehouses are the perfect institutions to ram through their minority worldview while subverting democracy:
1) statehouses deal with almost every contested issue in politics. And every issue THEY care about. Roe. Guns. Schools. Climate. Etc
2) statehouses also have an enormous influence over democracy itself. They write the rules re how we vote, when we vote, how we register or are purged. They also draw the district lines for themselves & Congress.
They even play a role in the electoral college process
12/
And it turns out, these powers give them an incredible ability to lock in minority rule through a combination of voter suppression and extreme gerrymandering
2012 and 2018 offer brutal examples where Republicans stayed locked into statehouse power even when states were blue
13/
Gerrymandering does even more than that, though. They’ve created a system where almost to a person, not a single member of their majorities are EVER in real elections. Their elections are guaranteed for entire careers.
Here’s the avg margin of victory in OH over a decade
14/
And this is key, because not only do they stay in power as a minority, but that lack of accountability means they can pass the most extreme & toxic bills and stay in power. Things like banning Roe w no exceptions—which in any normal democracy would guarantee an election loss
15/
So after a decade of Statehouses being rigged in this way, it turns out almost every incentive we assume leads to good public service is turned upside down: public outcomes don’t matter; being mainstream hurts you; being extreme helps you.
Which leads to a downward spiral
16/
But of course, since all those terrible behaviors would guarantee they’d lose in a real democracy, this new generation of statehouse “leaders” know that they must keep gerrymandering and attacking democracy in order to stay in power.
So they do that non-stop, and fiercely
17/
Those attacks took place from 2011-2020, in the form of gerrymandering, suppression, and later in the decade, attacks on election outcomes themselves. And of course, they accelerated even more after 2020, modeling off what had worked previously.
18/
And the reason I call them Laboratories of Autocracy is these statehouses are always learning and copying from one another’s successes and failures, guided by national groups such as ALEC and right-wing think tanks. Pushing their minority agenda through state capitals
19/
So back to the beginning:
1) the side on the left is battling over election outcomes in federal swing states, getting excited in big federal years.
2) the side on the right is battling democracy itself, using statehouses as their primary weapon to do so—grabbing state
20/
houses whenever and everywhere they can, then locking states down through gerrymandering, then pushing through an extreme worldview, learning from all the statehouses they control. And never stopping because there is no accountability for being more and more aggressive.
21/
With each side battling its battle, who’s going to win? Who’s winning?
Of course the side battling democracy in every state is going to win over the side only engaging in swing states in federal years. It’s not even close (even though the side on the left is the majority)
22/
BOTTOM LINE: until the side on the left sees that it’s in a full-fledged battle for democracy itself, requiring it to engage in the fight on the front lines (states, statehouses) where democracy is shaped, everywhere, all the time, w plans & passion that match that reality…
23/
that side is not going to win.
Yes. We must win every federal seat too, because they are key to protecting democracy.
But once you see the big picture I’ve laid out, you see what a disaster it is that for so long, we haven’t focused on much BUT those federal swing seats.
24/
There’s much more to say. And I say it :)
1) I wrote a book about it (w far more on what to do) 2) I tweet/videos daily, so follow me 3) I speak all the time to groups (DM me)
But for now on, be sure your political activity matches the reality we face.
In response to the HB-1 visa debate, unlike Vivek Ramaswamy, my first thought didn’t turn to “Friends” or sleepovers.
No, my mind went to a different place:
1/
And that is: some of the very oligarchs decrying that our nation does not generate enough home-grown talent to fill high tech jobs are also the ones who have been destroying our system of public education for decades.
2/
And by that I’m primarily referring to the state-level (and soon-to-be nationwide) push for universal private vouchers and low-flying for-profit charter schools, which we know are delivering terrible results while leading to slashed public education budgets.
3/
When he won the Nobel Peace Prize, in 2002, Jimmy Carter shared lessons he learned from a teacher back in Georgia:
“I thought often during my years in the White House of an admonition that we received in our small school in Plains, Georgia…
1/
from a beloved teacher, Miss Julia Coleman. She often said: ‘We must adjust to changing times and still hold to unchanging principles.’
When I was a young boy, this same teacher also introduced me to Leo Tolstoy’s novel, “War and Peace.”
2/
She interpreted that powerful narrative as a reminder that the simple human attributes of goodness and truth can overcome great power. She also taught us that an individual is not swept along on a tide of inevitability but can influence even the greatest human events.
3/
This was supposed to be the week of Squid Game 2, and Beast Games (if you have kids, you know).
But who knew that an unscheduled breakout of MAGA Games would rival them?
Day 1 was the unexpected explosion.
Day 2…
1/
the shrapnel still reverberated around the right-wing universe.
Vivek Steps Back
First, Vivek Ramaaswamy, who started it all, pulled back and attempted to move on—although others didn’t want to let him.
But on his way back to “work,” he couldn’t help…
2/
but try to reframe the narrative (a direct assault on “Friends,” prom queens and sleepovers) that had gone so badly.
How do you unite a fractured right?
Vivek knows. Just pretend you had been attacking drag queens, Cardi B and woke history and everyone will like you again:
The Christmas spirit faded quickly in MAGA-world, as the following day was marked by an explosion of infighting among its factions and biggest names.
1/
A week of of social media debate about tech companies hiring large numbers of employees from other nations, via HB-1 visas, exploded when DOGE co-chair Vivek Ramaswamy attempted to explain the trend. American culture is broken, he tweeted, marked
2/
by too many “Friends” reruns and prom queens and not enough admiration of characters like Screech.
That cultural broadside launched a predictable backlash of both rational responses along with fierce anti-immigrant invective.
Still a private citizen, Trump staked claims on the territory of two sovereign nations. After the President of Panama rebuffed Trump’s suggestion that the US should reclaim the Panama Canal from Panama, Trump replied: “we’ll see about that!”
1/
Early this morning, Trump staked another claim—this time declaring that the United States should seize Greenland from Denmark:
2/
In a different context, from a different source, such saber-rattling would spark international crises.
But it’s Trump, so most of the nation and world—his own allies included—dismiss these comments.
3/
While it’s unclear what will happen in the coming days, Musk’s chaos machine has clarified a number of realities even before the Trump term begins:
WATCH, RT and
1/
1) with his billions, willingness to invest it in primaries, and huge digital/disinformation megaphone via Twitter/X, Musk has more power/sway than Trump and is not afraid to show that to the world (past fat cats hid this fact better);
2/
2) just a few tweets from Musk can launch a battle royale within the Republican Party; given their thin margins in the House, and fear of primaries, that is a guarantee of chaos and perpetual leadership uncertainty;
3/