@againstgroomers#GaysAgainstGroomers claims to want to protect children from predators. That's a noble goal. But is this the way to do so? The shotgun approach to smearing people with the stench of child abuse is dumb, dangerous, and wrong. It will get someone killed. Have we learned nothing?
@againstgroomers Your kid is in kindergarten. Mother's Day is approaching. A well-meaning teacher brings out "Stella Brings the Family" to help *your* child. Maybe you find it inappropriate. Maybe other parents do. Fine. You really ok with calling her a groomer? No. amazon.com/Stella-Brings-…
@againstgroomers Ghislaine Maxwell is a groomer, not your local elementary school teacher. Using the groomer meme waters down actual abuse.
@againstgroomers@theammind@SpencerKlavan Calling others groomers isn't the way for "reasonable gays" to distance ourselves from queer madness. Being ourselves is.
Gay parents who lean right are in a unique position to cut a common sense path through these issues. We don't need to call others child abusers to do so.
@againstgroomers@theammind@SpencerKlavan Nor do we need to take or share pictures of other people's kids at Pride events or Drag Queen Story Hours. That's not cool either.
So yeah, let's push back against some of the craziness. But can we do it more responsibly?
Memetic responsibility — ethical use of memes — is a topic worthy of more discussion.
I don't see the point of waging a culture war if you lose your moral compass in the process.
Something to consider.
Here are some more substantial ways to push back:
•Promote school choice & homeschooling
•Promote pushing decisions on DQSH & other issues to local communities
•Run for local school board
•Network w other parents
•Have kids, raise a family
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Spent the last two years off Twitter, changed my info diet, survived parenting under Covid, worked on my shit, and evolved. Dipping my toes back on Twitter. Experimenting and kind of ambivalent about it. Hope life is treating you all well.
What are some observations?
• I used to think Twitter helped me think more critically. That it made me smarter. But it controlled me in ways I didn't fully appreciate. It skewed my info diet, created weird subtle social pressure, rewarded righteous anger and bad energy.
• I used to intellectualize the info environment, wrote papers about it etc. And then I became a victim of it. The forces here are real & not abstract. Today I appreciate the human, real-world impact more and think about these issues with a greater sense of responsibility.
As a Republican and (past) Trump supporter, I find it deeply disturbing how few people are acknowledging the obvious truth: that there was a deliberate, coordinated attempt to interfere in the electoral process led by Trump. This is a moral failure.
I understand the counter-narratives:
-the 2020 election was stolen
-feds spurred the riots
-Democrats have done far worse
-the hearings are one-sided & scope of investigation should be widened
Even if history proves these true, a Constitutional red line was still crossed.
I also get that midterms are coming up. The GOP has every reason to BTFO Democrats next fall... on nearly every issue! Denying and ignoring what happened makes sense politically. But what about the bigger picture? It seems short-sided and wrong to turn a blind eye.
How would you describe @elonmusk's political views? Been thinking about this and my sense is that he represents a new strain in American politics. I'm calling it "rocketship centrism." (Feel free to suggest better language.)
Let me describe what I mean....
The term "centrist" may evoke brunch, bland thinking, and business as usual. That's definitely not Elon. Rocketship centrism is something else. Rocketship centrism challenges conventional thinking from left & right, obsesses about the future, & is very bold.
Rocketship centrism doesn't shy away from culture war issues, but it does keep them in perspective. Consider Elon's views on #Pride. One day he's mocking it. The next he's bragging about Tesla's LGBTQ track record. This might seem incoherent but I don't think it is.
Been finding much of the free speech glee reductive and misplaced. "Free speech" works rhetorically and @elonmusk knows this. The question is how the ideals of speech translate to product strategy & content moderation. There's a lot of complexity here. Tons of little questions.
I used to be a free speech absolutist on platforms like Twitter. I now believe that translating the ideals of free speech to a global tech platform requires some degree of content moderation. And yes, censorship. Ironic, I know.
Should malicious foreign info ops count as free speech, for example? My view is no. Functionally, the free speech argument provides cover to bad actors. It seems more constructive to engage in "free speech"-type product questions at a more granular level.
Some thoughts on @elonmusk's acquisition of Twitter:
A year ago I wrote a (long, wonkish) paper on the terrain of discourse — how influence over platforms, algorithms, data, deplatforming policies, and speech regulations are a new expression of power. We are seeing this play out. americanaffairsjournal.org/2021/05/the-te…
Elon's acquisition of Twitter can be seen as a play for influence over the TERRAIN of global discourse. This has become a significant instrument of power.