RANT: Look, I get that ignoring January 6 Committee makes sense b/c we know it is a political show trial, but conservatives need to start paying attention b/c they've moved WAY beyond show trial to intentionally lying to American people & withholding evidence exposing fraud. 1/
2/This threadette & internal links provide details but to understand fully what J6 Committee did to slander innocent lawyer who fully cooperated you MUST read my article, transcript from Thursday's hearing, Klukowski's statement, & @washingtonpost article.
3/3 I have links to all in the article or the thread. THIS should be a huge story and huge scandal and every honest journalist & politician should demand release of transcripts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD RANT PART II: Next tweet in thread will link to original rant, but I open with this. As much as I disapproved of @RepLizCheney participating in J6 show trial, I accepted she was acting as her conscience dictated to do right by her country. See prior tweets re Cheney. 1/
2/ If you enlarge those pictures you will see in first one every time I mentioned "Cheney" ever on twitter. Only prior time was to "defend" her against baseless attack BEFORE today. But @RepLizCheney has not merely been a pawn she has been a perpetrator of fraud on country &
3/ an innocent DOJ attorney who have a family to support. She knowingly and maliciously lied about him when he cooperated fully w/ committee. And has caused @washingtonpost & other outlets to repeat lies.
OMgosh! I could NOT for life of me figure out why @RepLizCheney and Jan 6 Committee wanted to lie about Klukowski. It NOW makes sense: They HAD to lie to connect Clark proposal to Eastman. Read Washington Post's repeating of lies & re-read my piece. 1/ washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
and he is right, this is huge! The J6 committee blatantly LIED about a cooperating witness to create non-existent connection b/w Clark and Eastman. And I confirmed lie w/ source who confirmed
BREAKING: Amended complaint filed in @RealSLokhova lawsuit against Halper, with new representation by the great @McAdooGordon 1/
2/ This remains a publicly unanswered question: Did Halper's false representations to fbi re Lokhova and Flynn prompt opening of investigation into Flynn?
3/Whoa! This is so strange! Why would Simon & Schuster care if Post Hill Press canceled the book or not--they could just refuse to distribute. Sure suggests a lot more pressure than 1 letter!
2/ Beyond holding, key aspects of opinion. First, rejecting 2-part standard. This has implications beyond this case.
3/ This is a great point in Thomas' footnote: Not being able to break into a known gang members home also has public safety implications, but the 4th Amendment isn't gutted to "save one child."
@GirlsGoneGuns@FDRLST I absolutely agree re the flippant attitude, but considering all the crazy "moles" popping up at the time that Barr wacked, I can "get" why that was his attitude. BUT I also get why Trump had Trump's attitude and am writing that up now. 1/
@GirlsGoneGuns@FDRLST 2/ I would also add, though, that if all the cray-cray wasn't going on at the time, the legitimate issues of violations of state election law would have been taken more serious--or at least now they would have, but instead everything is discarded as wacko conspiracies.
@GirlsGoneGuns@FDRLST 3/ Right needs to get beyond the "sides" in the 2016 election & fighting over "voter fraud" & whether it happened or didn't and focus on the systemic problems with our electoral system that MAKE widespread voter fraud POSSIBLE as well as disenfranchising legal voters w/ illegal
Since Jimmy Carter is trending, a little reminder of his anti-semitic past, which converted me from my "Carter was a good and decent man, but an incompetent President," to "not a good man," in addition to being the second or third worst American president. 1/