4/X If the Nikkei had grown with domestic money supply like the S&P does, it would be >100k today. Instead it's below 27k.
Why is that?
Has to do with foreign trade & demographics dynamics.
JPY appreciated big time. Yen demand due to exports. Up 3x vs. USD since '71 (2% pa).
5/X While it may have been beneficial for a domestic Japanese investor to then hold Yen instead of investing it in domestic stocks, we cannot make the same argument for a global investor assessing the S&P.
IMO a fairer comparison is having both Nikkei and S&P in USD:
6/X Looks much more like having upward drift and even outperforms S&P at times. But this massive bump in the 80s taking decades to deflate! Looks very similar to the S&P post 1929. What the heck were Japanese investors thinking when they bought the top?
Demographics explain it!
7/X Remember my HA-HW metric? Delta between the cohort saving/investing most and the one selling most.
Boy, does this explain the boom & bust well! I should have branded this metric better. Look at the incredible chart below, like a shadow of the Nikkei.
8/X The Western Boomers caused dotcom. But π―π΅ Boomers were 10y ahead of the game. Same goes for the Millennials. 10y early in π―π΅ providing a nice demographic tailwind for the coming 5y. After 2025, I would definitely place my bets on πΊπΈ though.
9/X What about Europe btw since we're already at it? Don't touch it with a 10ft pole. π
10/X Bottom Line: Abysmal performance of Nikkei is driven by foreign trade & demographics dynamics both of which do not pertain to the S&P as of today in a comparable manner.
Okay, some excesses in '21, but nothing comparable to the '80s in Japan requiring decades to unwind.
11/X Instead, a favorable demographic set-up. USD won't appreciate in uncontrolled fashion bc πΊπΈ is not a net exporter of goods & services. Some appreciation risk from tightening. But likely self-solving as it carries the seeds of disinflation and monetary easing once again.
12/12 This π§΅is a summary of the article linked below in which I go into significantly more detail. Please check it out and consider retweeting or subscribing if you like it. Really helps building reach. fallacyalarm.substack.com/p/baburu-keikiβ¦
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/X Why $AMRS owns the #Synbioπand $DNA needs a telescope to see them.
$DNA is valued at 3x $AMRS while both have comparable revenue levels and 75% of $DNA's revs relate to Covid testing which is not relevant for the long term story.
2/X Key difference is that $AMRS takes control of entire value chain from R&D to manufacturing to end product marketing (vertical approach), while $DNA focuses on R&D, i.e. designing metabolic pathway & letting partners/customers do the rest (horizontal).
3/X For $AMRS, the molecule is the product, for $DNA it is the (yeast) strain.
$DNA's horizontal approach is supposed to be a strength vs. $AMRS by freeing resources for what supposedly matters most. Reasoning that is deeply flawed. It assumes that $DNA is/will be better in R&D.
1/6 i am seeing ppl referring to the affordability crisis of housing a lot lately and often they implicitly or explicitly make the inference that this is a driver for a housing price correction.
affordability is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for price drops.
2/6 that argument would be as trivial as stating that something has to come down just bc it has come up. this is not proper analysis. instead ask yourself why it has gotten less afforable in the first place and whether that is sustainable.
3/6 housing has outperformed other goods and services bc of demographic forces, a change in consumer preferences (seeking more privacy for home office, leisure activities and for health and political reasons) and store of value considerations due to excessive monetary debasement.
1/X From generation heads-down to generation heads-up. How $META will dethrone $AAPL. π§΅
Since the digital revolution started, most value was created at the gatekeeper who connects ppl with cyberspace, the human machine interface (HMI), going regularly through paradigm shifts.
2/X It started with PCs in the 80s, when $MSFT & $INTC symbiosis captured most value of revolutionary microchip tech bringing unprecedented computing power into pplβs homes.
Next shift was the smartphone, particularly Job's legendary iPhone intro:
3/X Revolutionized HMI forever. $AAPL was not the first. It was just time for the mobile computing revolution based on the convergence of several key techs, mostly computing power & display/touch screen tech. Winners are rarely the first, they just execute best.
1/17 What is Real World AI (RWAI) Computing and why will it become an important investment theme? A π§΅.
In times like this, it is tempting to attempt making short term bets on cyclical trends, but historically the real wealth creation came from big innovation events.
2/17 Mobile Computing
$AAPL unveiled the iPhone in Jan'07. Since then the stock is up 50x. And the innovation cycle of the smartphone is still unfolding (e.g. payment terminal and the car integration). The $AAPL we know today is just a milking machine of an innovation 15y ago.
3/17 Cloud Computing
$AMZN developed AWS in early '00s. In '02, Bezos wrote his famous email mandating the use of service interfaces which laid the groundwork for their AWS ecosystem, the first features of which were publicly launched in '06. Since then the stock has done a 60x.
1/5 quick 𧡠on housing prices since May data just came in
π¨π¦ housing mkt continuing going strong despite all the naysayers, up 2% MoM in May to a new record at an incredible speed. housepriceindex.ca/2022/06/may202β¦
2/5 often here that π¨π¦ in particular is highly overvalued compared to other markets since it is up 3x since 2000. IMO this neglects the countries' geostructure. most appreciation in last two decades has been in big cities as ppl want the job opps & infrastructure.
3/5 therefore, the more centralized a country the more upward bias in the composite. π¨π¦ RE is mostly Toronto & Vancouver where all immigration flows go. despite being a vast country, π¨π¦ is highly centralized. look at Miami, SF or NY. all up 3x over same 20y
the longer the current energy crisis persists, the more will we see fiscal (and ultimately monetary) stimulus. in this π§΅, I'll compile instances for INCREMENTAL spending commitments beyond official budgets.
πΊπ¦ spends $5-8bn a month to fight the π·πΊ invasion, which is largely financed by western deficit spending, mostly πΊπΈ which just provided a $40bn package. if πΊπΈ spends $60bn for this over 12 months, this is an incremental 0.3% deficit/GDP