Raoul Pal Profile picture
Jun 28 23 tweets 3 min read
At Madrid airport headed back home to Cayman after an amazing 3 weeks of Valencia, Jávea, Formentera and Ibiza. ❤️ Spain. Anyway, some thoughts on the lending mess in CeFi…1/
This entire episode of 3AC reminds me a lot of LTCM… for those who aren’t familiar, LTCM were a large hedge fund in the late 1990’s built by Nobel prize winners and the worlds most famous arbitrageurs from Salomon Bros, the famous risk taking investment bank…
Known as the Smartest Guys in the Room, everyone wanted to do business with them. As a young equity derivative salesman at Natwest running the hedge fund desk, they were my largest client.

In Eq Derivs they did three main types of trades - share class arbitrage, vol arb and
Merger arb. All were deemed to be low risk and as these guys had lots of money under managements (at least it was a lot back then) all the prime broking desks and lending desk fawned over them, competing to give them the best rates. Commissions were huge and everyone was happy…
But their strategies in the equities markets were DWARFED by what they were doing in rates markets where their basis trades positions, vol positions, etc were truly gigantic…
They were everyone’s biggest clients in both commissions and lending/prime broking.
These guys seemed to have a license to print money, driven by complex strategies and complex models. They were making around 30% a year in returns and were the poster child of the hedge fund industry.
In 1998 the Asian crisis was in full swing and liquidity in the dollar funding markets started to become an issue. Central banks had been tightening and the game of dollar funding musical chairs had begun…
As ever,when the funding tide goes out, the weakest borrowers get hit first. In this case it was the massively over-leveraged Asian economies and it morphed into a global crisis of epic proportions.
As is usual, the funding tightness spread as banks started to get losses from Asia and the next weakest link was found - the risk arb hedge funds. LTCM, having access to more cash and leverage were not the first to go but as smaller funds began to fold, arb spreads widened..
At first LTCM added to their trades - this was basically risk free if you had enough capital ! (Or so they thought…)

Surely LTCM were going to clean up as the weakest hands got shaken out?!
Their complex models had failed to capture one key risk - liquidity.

Their entire strategy was short liquidity. And liquidity was in in very short supply!
Then all at once all the investment banks realized that their biggest client was the same one - LTCM. They had around $4bn in capital but they had borrowed hundreds of billions (yup!).
Everyone started tightening funding terms and more copycat funds began to fold, pushing out arb spreads further. Then the Street smelled blood and began to hedge exposure by taking the other side of LTCM.
LTCM blew up, the Fed had to cut rates and Goldman (where I had moved to by then) and others essentially took over the firms positions and unwound the risk to protect themselves at the behest of the NY Fed.
The losses in excess of investor capital were $4bn. Investors were wiped out and many big banks had huge, huge losses.

It almost brought down the system at the time, hence the need for the Fed emergency cut in 1998 that fueled the dot com bubble.
There are many parallels with 3AC and the crypto lending markets. CeFi (not DeFi) clearly had one main client - 3AC, the smartest guys in the room. It appears now that they were the largest driver of CeFi yields…
The market is busy cleaning this up without the Fed but Goldman, FTX and others are jockeying to take up roles to mop up the distressed assets which is how efficient markets should clear
It is not the end of CeFi or DeFi but it will drive better risk management and probably regulation.

The digital asset space will have learned the key lesson of leverage and liquidity.
After all macro rules all and liquidity is a key macro variable.

Liquidity cycles will turn up over time and humans being humans will find yet another way to create leverage…
And we will repeat the same again in a different market ad infinitum.
Remember - LTCM wasn’t the end of arbitrage, equity vol, bond markets or anything. It just moved leverage elsewhere as banks create leverage to make money. That is their sole job.

This is nothing but a bump in the road of digital assets too.
This storm too shall pass (or may have even passed as peak liquidity tightening has passed too it is very close to it).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Raoul Pal

Raoul Pal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RaoulGMI

Jun 29
FinTwit is mentally exhausting these days, even after my holiday… the issue is one of probabilistic outcomes 1/
Right now there are more realistic possible outcomes than at any time I’ve ever worked in and as a macro investor my job is to endlessly reassess the odds of the outcomes. Hence why it’s exhausting!

So, what are the main probabilistic outcomes?
1. Recession where inflation is not fully brought to heel and thus rates remain higher for longer and inflation comes back after recession. This is the core FinTwit view and is very reasonable. This is the 1970’s redux view. I think we lack demand for this.
Read 15 tweets
Jun 14
Macro Update:

When the world's most important collateral, US treasuries, undergo unprecedented volatility, margin calls are everywhere. When the position you borrow to invest in has massive volatility too, there are even more margin calls.

Welcome to 2022. 1/
As I have pointed out many times, the tightening of financial conditions caused by commodities, rates and the dollar is the largest in history. The GS financial conditions index is not only lagging but it doesn't fully capture the situation.
My view is that we are going into a sharp recession. The SPX is currently pricing ISM at 46.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 14
Finally got in front of a Bloomberg at my Mum's house in Spain. Quick crypto update and a macro one to follow... 1/
Leverage is your enemy in a volatile asset. I never use leverage in crypto. Waves of margin calls are hitting those silly enough to use it and that is forcing the markets lower and causing more margin calls...

This is not just a crypto thing. All collateral is being liquidated.
But as I have always pointed out my framework is to expect 60%+ drawdowns relatively frequently over my 5- to 10-year time horizon. The key thing to note is that in a secular long-term exponential trend, each of these troughs is much higher than the last...
Read 13 tweets
May 30
Just writing Global Macro Investor over the weekend and as ever, I like to share a few insights.

The narrative on Twitter is that tech is dead. The reality is that the Nasdaq has just reverted back to trend - 150 week moving average 1/
Put another way, we are at the bottom of the log regression channel, suggesting that the NDX is cheap (but can see more downside in a spike).
Valuations are back to the average....
Read 21 tweets
May 12
Macro Views:

As Ive talked a lot about, I think we are going into a pretty nasty recession (or are in one). Lay offs are coming as are house price falls. Demand destruction is everywhere due to the largest monetary tightening in history. 1/
The equity markets, as I have pointed out in recent tweets, have priced this already. The credit markets are beginning to price this and copper is doing its job. Its the YoY rate of change of these assets you need to look at.
The bond market and oil are the two assets not pricing in future recession yet (due to the supply issues in energy). Bonds finally decided to join the party and the trend of higher yields , lower equities has probably ended. Lower stocks now equal lower yields....
Read 10 tweets
May 10
With all the $UST drama I thought I'd tell you a story...

You see, everyone knows the story of the Bank of England vs Soros. BOE lost, Soros won but people forget the HKMA vs the hedge funds in 1998...
The game in town for the macro hedge funds was to slot the HK$, which forced rates to rise due to the currency peg, which caused equities to fall. They shorted stocks and the $HKD. It was a beautiful spiral and everyone added and added to their trade. Pegs break, don't they?
Then the HKMA changed the game. They bought equities. Everyone got carried out. The HKMA won.

Peg breaks are drama but no one knows how they will place out. @BarrySilbert points out, most recover.

$UST look like they stepped away from support. That gets the shorts hot to trot!
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(