STURGEON'S CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCAM: Sturgeon said that Dorothy Bain, The Lord Advocate, will ask the Supreme Court whether her proposed referendum would be legal. But that's not how the process works. The Supreme Court isn't a place where you go for legal advice. 1/5
The Supreme Court, like any court, doesn't deal in hypotheticals. Martin 'Claim of Right' Keatings asked the Court of Session whether the Scottish Parliament has the power to hold an independence referendum without requiring the consent of the UK Government. 2/5
The judge dismissed Keating's action, saying it was HYPOTHETICAL and PREMATURE. The Scottish Government has to have passed a bill AND the Lord Advocate has to have declared as being within its competence BEFORE it goes to the Supreme Court. But, why is there no Bill? 3/5
A reminder: Section 29 of The Scotland Act says that any bill that 'aims to effect' the constitution is ILLEGAL 4/5
Sturgeon either doesn't know the process and is a fool, or more likely, does know the process and is stringing her followers (and the rest of us) along. It's a SCAM, designed to waste our time. #BoycottThePretendyRef 5/5
However, it means that we can mount a PEOPLE'S CHALLENGE to her Bill when it does come up. But to do so, we need your support. Donate now so we can start the process with a QC's legal opinion. donorbox.org/destroy-the-pr…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
