Essentially, Reagan is admitting his opposition to our charter amendment is based on his belief that more voters participating in county elections — and a more diverse electorate — will make it harder for Republicans like him to win. They insist on a rigged playing field. #waelex
It is important to remember that King County elections are officially “nonpartisan.” No party labels on the ballot. Why is that? Well, a few years back, *Republicans* orchestrated a charter change to remove party labels, hoping it would make them more competitive. It didn’t work.
In recent times, it has become very common for Republicans to project their faults and motivations onto their opponents. They all seem to do it, a lot. But just because they want a rigged playing field doesn’t mean we do. Our goal is inclusion, not helping out a particular party.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Early this morning, the @seattletimes published a piece by Jason Mercier of the right wing Washington Policy Center. That's not unusual. What is noteworthy is that they gave it top billing... it got put above the digital fold, as you can see from this screenshot:
@seattletimes Typically, stories written by the Times' journalists (or its columnists, like Danny Westneat) get these spots. Not "op-eds." But @SeaTimesOpinion really, really wanted eyeballs for Mercier's piece, so the Times did Mercier a favor and made his submission as prominent as possible.
@seattletimes@SeaTimesOpinion Presently, as of this thread, the piece still has the top spot under Opinion, above a Horsey cartoon and an editorial from the Times' own staff, as you can see from this second screenshot:
King County Council currently taking up our proposal to move elections for twelve county offices to #evenyears. #walex@KCCKohlWelles is speaking in favor, saying she strongly supports it.
Now, @KccClaudia is explaining how we will see better and more diverse turnout for our county-level offices if we adopt this charter amendment. #walex
Councilmember @reagandunn calls the proposal “thoughtful” and “well-intentioned” but argues that having more people voting doesn’t necessarily mean we have a more “informed” electorate. 🙁 We disagree: A smaller electorate doesn’t equal a more informed electorate.