So what happened in HD 16? For starters, former leader Lang’s second choice for the district made no friends. Her colleagues were annoyed, advocates couldn’t work with her, and she made the unthinkable decision to hire someone who is accused of downplaying the rape of girls.
One only has to look at the fact that the least liked person in the GA, Rep. Morrison, had a better session this year to see she wasn’t effective. She had Drury vibes. However, she was an incumbent in a district that was tired of turnover. She should have won last night.
My employer endorsed Kevin along with several other unions but the most stinging endorsements came from @GPacIllinois which directly undercut her biggest talking point. When local politicians jumped in the race got real.
Revenge of Kalish? Looking at precinct totals a couple things obviously stand out. In 2020 Kalish won the city by 822 votes and still lost - Olickal won it by 1032. Kevin competed in the suburbs but won the election in the city.
In 2020 DWS, trounced Kalish by over 2,772 votes in the suburbs. In 2022 she only won the suburbs by 567 votes. Infact for the first time in a long time (if ever) Chicago vote totals exceeded the suburbs.
This might explain the electoral confidence House Dems were pushing; She was winning the suburbs. Problem was the suburbs weren’t showing up to vote. She wasn’t working hard the city because the suburbs were where her win came from meanwhile Olickal was filling that Chicago void.
There were other factors too, while the media was talking about how hard DWS was working Olickal actually was. The guy was a beast at the doors. The 50th ward progressive wing has been organizing - they are a bigger player then in the past and Sen. Villivalam went all in.
The 16th might be looking for a new Rep in 2 years, who knows it seems to be the thing to do in the 16th, but for now a lot of people are happy to be moving on. #twill
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This was a bill I was lucky to work on for over two years. Our first stake holders meeting was the bill sponsors, NASWIL, Equip for Equality and giant table of folks who were none to please to have to discuss this issue and were determined to make sure a bill never passed. #Twill
There is some really great things in this bill, even if it doesn’t move as fast as some of us wanted. Prone restraint is virtually banned for all kids, seclusion can only be used as a last result, requires a ton of reporting and pushes a phase out.
There is also some other things in there that haven’t gotten a lot of press like a ban on these schools chemically restraining kids or denying them food, bathroom breaks and water. Things that were happening and were legal.
So the Chicago Board of Education, when given an opportunity to remove trauma inducing SROs from their schools - instead punted. It wasn’t unexpected, just disappointing after expirencing the work Chicago youth did.
The largest media coverage was around their marches, protests outside @chicagosmayor and even the BOE Chair’s home. However, the youth did some amazing work lobbying behind the scenes as well.
They researched fact based arguments rooted in academic research, they proposed alternatives to policing, they organized Zoom meetings with BOE members and worked to persuade a reluctant board to coming 1 (almost there) vote away.
People are going to need an FAQ for the FAQ but there is so much in the @ChicagoEthicsBd opinions that are interesting and few questions I now have. chicago.gov/content/dam/ci…
The social media ones stand out, public messages on Social Media (even directed at elected officials) = not lobbying. Private messages could be. It appears as if public is considered indirect and therefore permissible.
It would appear, but not directly stated that media interviews and quotes would also apply. Curious when the elected official engages said social media post, as some have tended to do or even sends you DMs complaining about your post -- when does their action change your status.
If you missed this press conference, I encourage you to find it on the internet...it was something. Let’s discuss.
I think it is safe to say that @SharkeyCTU1 isn’t going to get invited to @chicagosmayor house anytime soon for her preferred craft beer. And honestly, you kind of expect a level of dislike and exhaustion in both individuals at this point.
Tonight though...whew. When asked by a reporter how students are going to catch up for the lost instructional time. The Mayor’s response was along the lines of harm was already done and she isn’t rescheduling days. Which is weird...and then you realize she is talking about kids
If you were to tell me a year ago, I would be congratulating a billionaire Governor on his successes and protesting the mayor who replaced Rahm - I would have thought you were crazy. Yet here we are.
The difference? One set out to show his campaign promises were commitments the other set out to show hers were mere suggestions.
This (what appears now inevitable) strike boils down to a union fighting to put in writing a Mayor’s campaign promises from just 7 months ago.
When @politico_il gets it wrong - you have to hand it to them - they get it REALLY wrong. Unfortunately not fact checking the talking points from the Mayor’s office misleads the public too. (Sigh) let’s dive in: #Twill
For starters, no @politico_il CPS has not agreed to yet another 200 social workers as your post implies.
In fact if you read the new CPS website you can clearly see the words “earlier this summer” when describing the social work offer. Why would you say there is a new offer - offering 200 more @politico_il ?