Fergal Profile picture
Jul 2 13 tweets 4 min read
Intro to far-UVC air-cleaning from a non-expert.
Ultraviolet light has been used to sterilise objects for decades and has been used to clean air in rooms since the 1940s, with TB being a big driver of that.
It's called UR-UVGI - upper-room UV germicidal irradiation.
That kind of UV light is harmful to humans, causing "sunburn", skin cancer and cataracts. That's why it's "upper room", you shine it away from the humans. Of course that means you have to wait for the bugs to float up there to kill them. Warm air rises, so they do get up there.
Recently we have far-UVC light which is a higher frequency (222nm). It's just as effective at killing bugs but "harmless" to humans.
"Harmless" here is still kinda new, so don't go staring at these lights for hours on end.
nature.com/articles/s4159…
There are recommended exposure limits. Depending on power and distance, the limit is hours or even days. So we can kill corona, flu, TB etc in public spaces from the moment it's exhaled,. No waiting for it to float to the right place.
Lots of info here.
The lamps are still pretty expensive but production is ramping up, so prices will come down. That said, demand may also ramp up, so it could be a few years before prices really drop.
I've been looking at various manufacturers recently, particular in China.
First UVC's news page says they were visited by the head of China's corona task force.
That's more evidence that China is betting big on this for their end game.
firstuvc.com/article/32.html
Also I think their lamps were used by the Chinese Olympic team in Japan.
(Thanks for the Chinese propaganda warning Twitter!)

They make a range of lamps, including a personal USB/battery powered lamp!
It costs $260USD.
I don't know enough about the details on this to tell whether a 5W lamp like this is gimmick or could actually keep you safe in a restaurant.
firstuvc.com/product/9.html
Most of their room-fixture lamps are $1000USD-$3000USD.
Other companies like Care 222 (Ushio in Japan) are a bit more expensive, however I would probably trust them for safety a bit more.

care222.com
Gimmicks aside, this seems like the future. Clean air just like clean water, although when going on holidays "don't breathe the air" is going to be a bit more of a challenge than "don't drink the water"!
Addendum:

Here's a paper where they found that far-UVC was doing the equivalent of 184 ACH. I.e. It reduced the viral load like a ventilation system that replaces or filters the air in the room 184 times per hour. That'd be a wind-tunnel!
nature.com/articles/s4159…
They did this with 5 lamps installed in the ceiling, in a room 4.26m x 3.35m x 2.26m. It doesn't what wattage the lamps were but being in the room for 8 hours would still leave you below the recommended daily exposure limit.
So the headline is 36 ACH (184/5=36). That's probably about $3000 of lamp to get 36 ACH equivalent in a 14sqm room. Kinda pricey but doing that with HEPA or ventilation would be completely impractical and maybe even more costly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fergal

Fergal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fergal_whatever

Jul 1
China with the far-UVC. I don't know how long it's going to take them (I'm guessing under 5 years since Beijing said another 5 years of zero). They are coming out of this pandemic with clean air and a healthy population.
Far-UVC at the airport.

This isn't happening by accident. You don't get airports and banks installing tech like this on a whim.

Read 7 tweets
May 28, 2021
niid.go.jp/niid/ja/diseas…

Japan's National Institute for Infectious Diseases published an epidemiological investigation showing long range airborne transmission on a plane. It occurred in Mar 2020. It was published in Oct 2020 in Japanese only.

@jmcrookston @jljcolorado
I've summarised it here and translated their seat-map.

wargle.blogspot.com/2021/05/super-…

Below is mostly a repeat of that
Main takeaways:

- started off following the “2 row rule” but after finding a bunch of infections near the index case they expanded and expanded and eventually tested 122 out of 141 passengers.
- found another 14 PCR positive passengers.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(