I'm Myk, I've got several neurodivergent conditions and it took me almost 4 decades but I finally love who I am and am proud of myself in a way that loves my disabilities instead of overlooking them. Now I help others get here.
I do that mostly by just existing honestly online. I am open about being Autistic and having ADHD, and I talk about the benefits and the challenges without shame.
This shows other people like me -- many living in a prison of shame their whole lives -- that it's safe to come out.
To be #DisabledAndProud doesn't mean you have to find some toxic positivity that reframes your challenges as superpowers or whatever, that's not it.
Own those challenges, they're a part of you.
It's about loving yourself including your challenges, not being defined as lesser.
So this is just to say: this #disabledpridemonth realize that you can drop that shame and just live.
Shame isn't helping you and it's not helping anyone else. There's literally nothing wrong with being disabled, a quarter of humanity is disabled. Shame is inappropriate.
Finally, this can be tricky when our challenges are such that we depend on others for support.
Because that's a case where it DOES matter whether the people you're relying on really Get It or not. You can be as self-actualized as you want, neglect is neglect.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Cis people, we need to have a quick talk, circle up.
Now is the time. If you were waiting for a signal it's gone up. If you weren't sure how to help, keep reading. But it's time, and it's only going to get worse for our trans friends from here so these are ways to help fight.
1. If you are a manager or maintain any kind of leadership position at work, establish explicitly and publicly that anti-trans discrimination or commentary is grounds for immediate termination. That it's no different from racism or homophobia.
2. If you are someone who is doing messaging of any kind, make sure that your sensitivity readers include at least one trans person. Make sure that when you say "I asked women about this" you don't just mean "cis women".
What if instead of talking about Autism or ADHD or etc as neurotypes we took it a step further and deconstructed them into something even more easy to reason about:
"needs profiles"
Does this work? Does it capture that the difference is in what we need to be okay?
When you think of Autism as a disease you are unable to reason about the ways that it's deeply adaptive for many of us.
When you think of Autism as a neurotype you frame it as a fixed structure.
When you think of Autism as a needs profile you can approach it infinite ways.
Further it gives us a new place to attach language. We can say something like "the needs profiles of Autistic people tend to vary tremendously, whereas the needs profiles of dyslexic people tend to have a lot in common." etc.
Friendly reminder that Jon Stewart supports exploitative autism charities like Autism Speaks and Next for Autism.
I share this because these are the signs that tell you that you can’t trust a person.
He will turn on us, has already started his centrist schtick.
^^^ when y’all say things like “listen to disabled people!” the above is what you mean. If you meant it you’d RT stuff like this and not “yaaaas I heart him” tweets when he weighs in. It’s not always clear that y’all realize that.
These charities *exist* to launder support for the ABA industry, which is a multibillion dollar growth industry that sells parents literal Conversion Therapy for their Autistic kids.
It's covered by insurance in all 50 states and it is known to cause PTSD.
every time Mark Hamill is trending it's because the right wing can't reconcile the fact that they enjoy star wars movies with the fact that the main actor has a conscience.
Honestly? A lot of them see the empire or first order as sympathetic.
I wonder how much of this is on decades of pop cultural artifacts and games that “both-sides” a one-sided story. You can always play as bad guys in Star Wars games etc, did that confuse these folks?
We need a general public reckoning with a more complex definition of truth. We are at a point where the problems we face as a civilization cannot be reduced to slogans. Even the problems are hard to state clearly, the solutions harder.
To a lot of people that’s not okay.
Far easier to say that universal constants are constant than to recognize that they’re aggregate approximations of more complex underlying relations.
Far easier to think that objects exist than to recognize that they’re cognitive models of stable local energy patterns over time.
When I learned that Joss Whedon was a serial abuser and that he had directly harmed my friend @itsmeardenleigh I was in the middle of a buffy rewatch.
I love buffy, and I reflected on whether or not it was okay to keep watching it. I realized that it was much bigger than Joss.
You've got writers like Drew Goddard and others in there telling _amazing_ stories.
You've got the acting cast protecting the actress who played Dawn because they all knew Joss was a creep, and they instituted a "joss and dawn are never alone together rule" to protect her.
And I realized, in the context of the show, Joss is best understood as The First. That's what The First is referring to - the fundamental irreconcilable evil in the heart of that universe.
The way the show ends is a brilliant subversion of traditional power dynamics.