Share this page!

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jul 3 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
The crux of #ChirstoIslam is that religion supersedes dharma because religion is “God’s command.”

Dharma is natural. Friendship, love, respect are natural. Religion overrides this just like “God’s word” overrides human common sense and experience.

Dharmikas don’t get this.
Like, dislike is not the issue. We don’t get it. Since we don’t get their “God.”

Question is of “God’s command” over human ideas, of “God’s prophet” vs “ordinary” human beings etc.

Per that system how can you choose “God”’over anyone or anything. That’s shirk, worst of sins.
We kaffirs in our dumbness.

Did they kill over land or money? They knew they’d likely be caught and go to jail, lose everything.

But their “God” says they will get “eternal heaven”. What is a few years of worldly jail vs eternity?

Understand the “Gods” of #ChristoIslam first.
Lol. Yeah I first hear the term “Christian God” when I went to America.

Till you understand their god you have no idea what you’re dealing with. We keep saying these stupid things.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Jul 5
There was a world without fences.

Then some people came and put up a fence around a small area. They called the people who were outside the fence "outfencers."

Everyone inside the fence was called fencers and would have to obey to the rules. Those who resisted were killed. 1/
The goal of the fencers was to expand their territory and the people in it.

The fencers (or "infencers") were taught that the people outside the fence (out-fencers) were evil, because they didn't follow infencer rules.

The only way to save them was to make them infencers. 2/
Infencers were able to expand because they all believed one thing.

When they encountered others and called them "outfencers", the people who lived in a world-without-fences, didn't know what that meant. We are just people, they said.

"No, you're outfencers and you're evil." 3/
Read 21 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Jul 4
As comments here show, the Indian Left bases its arguments largely on the strawman fallacy. It is immune to discussion; since it has not taken the first step of accurately understanding its opponent's positions.

Its "moral supremacy" is based on tilting against windmills.
I do not consider myself "Left" or "Right." These categories are an imposition of Western political history and theory onto a non-Western society, and a form of colonialism.

I call the Indian Left as Left or Marxist, because it self-identifies as such.

indiafacts.org.in/opposing-the-l…
The Indian Left routinely dubs those they disagree with as "Fascists"/"Nazis." These are not self-descriptions (unless the groups self-identity as such) but polemics. As polemics they are good for propaganda or as virtue-signalling to their Western peers.
Read 10 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Jul 4
Getting the global Left to be apologists for Islam is the single biggest coup that Islamists have pulled off in the West. Using their own resources to target them.

Like having lambs carry the swords for their own slaughter. The Left are the #JihadCoolies.
Of course, Hindu "secular Left" in India are equally complicit #JihadCoolies as well.

It is worth recalling what happened to the Iranian Left after they collaborated in the Islamic takeover of Iran. The Leftists leaders were tortured and forced to publicly "confess" on TV. Image
The Islamic Regime of Iran tortured and forced the Leftists leaders (who'd helped in the "Islamic revolution") to "confess" and recant their ideology publically, because "The regime considered Marxism the main ideological rival of Islam." Marxism was akin to a religious rival. Image
Read 8 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Jul 4
Lol on strawman arguments.

1. No one is my “ideological guru” till I say so.
2. One quote in some historical context does not prove “inspired by Hitler.” To claim a movement is inspired by another needs far more evidence.
3. Hindus sheltered Jews, #ChristoIslam persecuted them.
RSS disavowed “We, Our Nationhood…”, it is not even written by Golwalkar, just a translation.

Also it’s no “Holy Book” except for opponents. No one cares for it.

Now let’s talk about the Holy Book that *does* teach hate for kaffirs and millions follow it. Isn’t that a problem?
Sure. Let’s discuss the Manusmriti. I don’t consider it a “Holy Book” but I’m always interested in learning.

Only caveat is that if you quote from it, use an authentic version with a reference to the original Sanskrit text that must be linked for reference.
Read 6 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Jul 1
Absolutely. Secularism was created to deal with the problems caused by totalitarian monotheisms. Every schism wanted to eliminate the other, leading to endless wars in Europe.

It has *no* application to pagan/dharmik majority societies; other than to control Abrahamic religions.
@YannMeridex

Read 4 tweets
Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture
Jun 29
Hindus trend #TotalBoycott while Indian State robs their temple wealth to fund massive schemes like #NaiManzil and #HunarHaat that exclude Hindus. 🙄

State funds madrassas, maulvis, promotes halal; funnels money to non-Hindu institutions. Start there.

sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
In the US and other places Hindus manage their temples via trusts without any problems.

In India Christians have autonomy to manage Churches, Muslims to manage mosques. There are caste and sect differences in all of those.

Why are Hindus alone considered incapable in India?
Got to Ministry of Minority Affairs and find the list of all the schemes which exclude Hindus. The total budget for this Ministry of Religious Discrimination (started by UPA) has increased the most under the Modi Govt.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(