Share this page!

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jul 5 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
If we win all of the close Dem house races, we don't have to worry about the insane possibility of losing the house when it matters most. cookpolitical.com/ratings/house-…
These are the races as currently predicted. Predictions do not take into account large turnout for Dems, because one of the assumptions of polling is that Dems don't turn out in midterms.
One of those races - I just discovered - is in my state, #Maryland. A man that is on the right side of things, and deserves support.
The only way to fix things is to VOTE LIKE MAD, and this may be our last best chance to do that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DirkSchwenk

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Jun 30
SCOTUS and the EPA. EVERYONE IS MAD AT THE WRONG THING. A contrarian thread.
Before proceeding, I have been an environmentalist for a long, long time. I worked for Greenpeace. I have taught ecology and outdoor school for kids. I remember Gore's early warnings, and I have watched the climate change in real time.
And as a lawyer, I spend a lot of time reading statutes and I have done a lot of work for free for environmental groups. Both of these parts of me see things differently than a lot of others. And WV v. the EPA looks different to me than most.
Read 13 tweets
Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Jun 28
Let's play this out for a second. If Trump had gone to the Capitol, practically every police asset would be tasked with protecting him, massively undermining an already weakened defense.
The rioters would have treated him as a God, and would have rallied to him, no matter what he ordered. Probably the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers expected him to come, and would have rallied to him.
We know - but the J6C has not yet discussed - that the militants had cached weapons in VA, awaiting some signal that never came. Trump's arrival would have been that signal. The rioters would have taken up firearms in addition to the spears and clubs.
Read 11 tweets
Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Jun 28
I just heard ROGER STONE let's go.
Meadows talked to Stone and Flynn on Jan. 5th.
Meadows dialed in to the Willard war room after repeated warnings that he should not go there.
Read 5 tweets
Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Jun 26
DERKACH. REMEMBER THE NAME.
DERKACH was working to undermine Ukranian resistance. news.yahoo.com/ukraines-sbu-e…
Derkach was directly communicating with Grassley, Nunes, and Lindsey Graham to undermine Biden politico.com/news/2020/07/3…
Read 6 tweets
Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Jun 17
I have had a couple of folks ask me about this question, since it is on @emptywheel's @MuellerSheWrote's minds and in fact I saw the same thing on CNN yesterday. I am sure the DOJ would like to have the depos, but I don't think it poses a risk for current prosecutions. I explain
As I discussed in the thread below, prosecutors must give all potentially exculpatory evidence to Defendants in sufficient time to allow for Defendant to prepare a defense for trial.
The DOJ manual also recommends that prosecutors give pretty much all evidence, whether asked or not, since that way they won't lose on appeal if it turns out they failed to give exculpatory evidence to the Defendant. justice.gov/jm/jm-9-5000-i… Image
Read 14 tweets
Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture
Jun 16
Dear Chief Justice Roberts. Here is your press release concerning the Roe v. Wade leak in which you announced an investigation less than 24 hrs from the news story on the leak.
CJ Roberts you described the leak as a "betrayal of confidences" "intended to undermine the integrity of our operations" and "a singular and egregious breach of" trust. You announced an IMMEDIATE investigation by the Marshal of the Court.
Today there are numerous news stories (and official releases) demonstrating that Ginni Thomas was participating in a seditious conspiracy AND discussing SCOTUS internal debates with co-conspirators. NOW THAT'S A SINGULAR AND EGREGIOUS BREACH OF TRUST.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(