In Nov 2021 the EU commission published a proposal for regulation on deforestation-free trade. After back-&-forth with experts & two debates in the Council, a revised draft was published in June. I'm now reading through - here are some (not so) #HotTakes.

consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press…
101: the legislation is designed to prevent the import into the EU of coffee, cocoa, palm oil, soya, beef and wood products which are limited to recent deforestation.
These products must be legally produced & companies placing goods on the EU market - ie commodity traders- must submit a due diligence statement that the risk their products is linked to deforestation is 'negligible'.
What does due diligence mean? The procedure includes three elements: information requirements, risk assessment, and risk mitigation.

The level of proof (ie assessment & mitigation) required will depend on whether the imports come from a high, standard, or low risk area.
Countries will be 'standard' risk by default, then by 18 months post-implementation, the list of high/low risk regions will be published. I say regions, because the wording allows subnational classification of risks. Makes sense, since deforestation is concentrated in 'hotspots'.
The new draft had changed the cut-off date for deforestation. From memory, it was 31 Dec 2020, but now is 31 Dec 2021...

Forest 'degradation' is now included, but with a strict definition: wood from primary forests converted into plantations will not be allowed to enter the EU.
SMEs are excluded from basically all due diligence requirements (eg risk assessment & mitigation, geolocation). They only need to record the registered trade name, the postal address and email
of their suppliers. (This is as weak as it sounds).
In terms of transparency, the EU will set up an IT system where companies submit their due diligence evidence. These days will be published in anonymous format, plus companies must provide an annual public report on their due diligence mechanisms.
They promise a first review of the legislation in two years time of basically everything that was controversial, but didn't get included: smallholders, non-forest biomes, rubber. NGOs were pushing hard for rubber to be included this time around.
One new product which was added was processed beef (the EU's main beef import from Brazil)... Traceability here will be hard. I remember Aldi some years ago had QR codes to check the origins of their canned beef from Brazil. But when you checked it would say origin 'unknown'.
The draft's explicit that certification doesn't substitute due-diligence... Interestingly, it promises to review the role of certification in future. Make no mistake, due-diligence is scary for certification, fundamentaly affecting their role in the 'sustainable products' market.
In terms of next steps, the EU parliament will rule on it in September - lobbying of MEPs will continue until then. After that the trilogue* begins!
*Cool name, huh? These are 'informal meetings between members of the Parliament, Council & the Commission' in order to reach agreement on an identical text, before the text can become law.
My phone battery is about to die, so that's all I got.

Disclaimer: though I study sustainable trade & keenly follow the progress of the draft legislation, I am not a lawyer. If in doubt, seek legal advice :)
Another thing I forgot is geolocation, ie identifying the property where commodities were produced. For cattle, this must include all ranches from birth to slaughter, closing the common 'indirect suppliers' loophole. They even want DD (but not geolocation) for the cattle feed!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erasmus zu Ermgassen

Erasmus zu Ermgassen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @erasmuszu

May 2
A handful of commodities (🐮🌴🍫☕️) cause a third of all #deforestation, harming millions of forest-dependent people, the climate & biodiversity

A few commodity traders (Cargill, Wilmar, Olam, etc) handle this trade

Here’s what you need to know about their sourcing practices 🧵
The supply chains which move commodities around the world are oft described as an hourglass.
Thousands of farmers supply a handful of commodity traders who in turn supply millions of downstream customers. Image
When downstream companies (manufacturers, retailers) make sustainability commitments, they rely on the traders who supply them to implement these commitments.

Ditto new #DueDiligence legislation which bans the import of products linked to deforestation or human rights abuses.
Read 22 tweets
Jul 29, 2020
Currently watching a superb webinar from @StandMighty presenting a host of cutting-edge work on #cocoa supply chains, including an update to their accountability map. A live-thread with some of the insights...
mightyearth.org/cocoa-accounta…
@VividEconomics presented a huge effort to map land uses in Côte d'Ivoire - which lost 2% of its forest cover IN ONE YEAR
Their data show staggering rates of forest loss for #cocoa in some regions, e.g. Bloléquin
Read 10 tweets
May 8, 2020
In non-COVID news, new science!

We show that a lot of information is hidden in the commonly used ‘representative’ environmental footprints of products. For accurate assessment you need supply chain specific data & @TraseEarth data allows you do this at large scale. 1/
Calculating the environmental/carbon footprint of products is hard, not least because many products are internationally-traded, which means that you may need data on production practices from the other side of the world.
Normally, people estimate the impacts embedded in trade in one of a few ways – using some kind of bilateral trade data (e.g. Environmentally-Extended Multi Regional Input Output, or EE-MRIO, models) or using product-specific life cycle assessments (LCA).
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(