Evening Twitter. Day 4, #RIMPAC2022 - Part II: RIMPAC is more than just a naval exercise, today’s thread is about amphibious stuff, military vocabulary, the different meanings of success, and my specific RIMPAC cap. And yes, I’m using an actual notebook, courtesy of @c21st_sailor
Today, courtesy of media team, we enjoyed a very good visit on USS Essex (LHD-2). This is an amphibious ship which is coming at the end of a good deployment and the ship had all the marks of an asset that has been at work for quite sometime. Still, it’s now here ready to play.
An amphib ship is a complex piece of kit that reminds us how maritime ops aren’t just about the navy, the marines are central to the maritime story and RIMPAC showcases that at different levels:
A. Integrating different nations in harbour phase to learn about each other;
B. Getting to a harmonised standard that is necessary for amphib exes to take place;
C. Getting the exercise done - in a way that achieves greater interoperability, but it does so without harming the environment.
- yes! The environment - and here this matters incredibly.
Vocabulary matters. It was interesting over the past few days to hear yaks about integration, interoperability, interchangeability. Definitions vary a little, but that’s how I’m getting to understand them:
1. Integration: bring someone into your system;
2. Interoperability: communicate and operate with someone else (which in most cases will also demand/assume a capacity to integrate with each other);
3. Interchangeability: in add to interoperability you can actually replace some of your own assets with those of someone else.
An amphib exercise is likely to test and push the boundaries of all of the above. And with RIMPAC being an adaptive framework, different partners can set their own benchmark.
Now, kudos to the ship chefs: the cookies. OMG. The cookies. They were superb.
One last thing. My RIMPAC cap. Got it last time I was here. Sold out on day one. I should have bought a few of them then. I could have easily paid half of the trip with those. Mental note for next time. Tomorrow… it’s carrier time. Oh yeah. Thanks!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Shinzo Abe: The legacy of Japan's longest-serving PM - an article full of old tropes that manages to miss entirely the crucial significance Abe’s legacy. My own thread on the statesman that has changed Japan’s role in international order: bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…
First things first. Many friends and colleagues have commented and will continue to do so on Abe’s life, policies, vision, and legacy. @observingjapan is always my own lighthouse on this, whilst @Andrew_Levidis is masterful on the personal history. I’d start here:
A personal note. I cannot claim to know Abe-San. But his assassination did shake me; as a scholar of Japan, I have engaged with Abe’s vision for a decade; as a person with strong ties to Japan, it came as a deep emotional wound. My thoughts are with those who mourn his loss.
Aloha - alas for the last time - Twitter: Day 5 #RIMPAC2022. Official press conference, started with condolences to Japan for the tragic loss of former PM Abe. A thread about partners, carriers, unmanned surface combatants, and the brilliant HMAS Canberra.
Partners as a narrative of operational effectiveness. Over the past few days senior commanders, officers, have all constantly pointed out the importance of developing partners interoperability. With 26 nations and more than 25k personnel that is a considerable task.
The press conference reinforced these points and seeing senior and flag officers from different nations with a Philippine and Korean warships in the background helped delivering the point, only somewhat let down by the comments and answers being provided only by USN hosts.
Aloha Twitter. Day 3 #RIMPAC2022 experience: today it was partners focus for me. I promised yesterday more on the exercise and some pretty pics and hopefully I won’t disappoint you. A thread on the largest multilateral exercise in the Indo-Pacific and what it means for partners:
1. An inclusive framework. From a Euro Atlantic perspective, informed by NATO formats for exercises, RIMPAC is less scripted, has different components, and a rather ‘tailor to your needs’ approach. This might sound like a constraint, but it is in fact a key element of appeal:
RIMPAC is inclusive as a framework as it allows different national objectives to find their affirmation. 2. A honing the skills opportunity. Whether because of its scale, its large number of participants, or indeed the diverse training opportunities, RIMPAC has great value.
Hola Twitter. NATO Strategic Concept 2022 is out. Much talk about it ahead of Madrid Summit. Perhaps the most interesting novelty is the specific reference to China. But what does that mean? A short thread on the Euro-Atlantic meeting the Indo-Pacific. nato.int/strategic-conc…
First things first.
a. Allies are different from partners: Art 5 below stating why. Seems obvious but yesterday had to explain distinction in Parliament and still, in the convo people got it wrong.
b. Defence AND shaping still present;
c. Cyber/space added to NATO’s ‘territory'.
1. Strategic Context: Increasingly polarised world. NSC goes very UK Integrated Review here - values of open societies, democratic processes (N.B. ‘democracy' used only twice as opposed to ‘democratic', used 5 times) vs. authoritarian regimes aim at undermining the system.
Hello Twitter. So I promised you some more pics about London Naval things. So here I am. A thread about navalism, international order, history, friends and partners. And yes, Global Britain and higher education’s role in it. A thread (with lovely pics):
First things first. If you were wondering what makes a navalist (American lingo for naval expert) really happy, I happen to have the answer: a firepower of navalists. Co-hosted with NPS, I was inspired, enriched, and just happy with a workshop that brought some superb minds here.
A number of mentors and friends brought their energy, insights to an in-depth conversation on the meaning of deterrence today. @peter_dutton@PeterDombrowsk6@jcaverley were generous in sharing their research findings. A real treat. Also, priceless just to get together.
Good evening twitter. I promised I’d come back to the sinking of the RFN cruiser Moskva (Pennant no 121) once more info were to become available. Here I am now. A thread reflecting on the most severe naval loss since the Falklands Wars: what happened, and its consequences.
What do we know now about those dramatic moments of 13-14 April 2022?
A couple of important preliminary observations: 1. The ship is now at the bottom of the BS (Black Sea), therefore short of efforts to reach the ship with dedicated tools, details will remain limited;
For example: in 2015, the remains of the Battleship Musashi were found and as a result of that discovery some of the fatal last moments of the ships became clearer - this is often the case. bbc.com/news/world-asi…