#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by Mohammed Zubair, the co-founder of fact-checking website @AltNews, seeking bail in a case in which he was arrested by the Uttar Pradesh police (#Sitapur) for referring to some Hindu religious leaders as “hate mongers” @Uppolice@zoo_bear
SG Tushar Mehta appearing virtually: Before the other party begins, I have a preliminary things to say. Yersteray this case was mentioned saying there was threat to life
SG: FIR was on June 1, quashing plea was rejected on June 10 and yesterday Sitapur court granted 14 days custody. This was not revealed yesterday and affidavit was filed yesterday. This is clear purposeful suppression.
Gonsalves: No criminal case can be made out against him. The fountain of this case is a tweet. I seek a quashing of proceedings. Questions of police or judicial custody are irrelevant now.
Justice Banerjee: against rejection of bail there is a different remedy.
Gonsalves: There is no case made out and the proceedings need to be quashed. I had admitted this is my tweet. Is this a criminal offence. Please see the tweet
Gonsalves: They say it was about insulting religion. Order says there is a prima facie case. I have admitted to this tweet. There is no investigation needed in this. Please see page 28 of our petition.
Gonsalves: I was only speaking of hate speech in respect of which the persons had been arrested for the most horrific hate speech and released again. I am not against release again.
Gonsalves: We only say till hate mongers like this are there now then who else do we need. All the others released on bail but I, a secular tweeter, was arrested. When I say hate monger I am not wrong police has prosecuted them under 295A IPC
SC: you have to make an appropriate plea.
SG: There was rejection of bail..
Gonsalves: what investigation are you doing to move me around, custody, seize my phone. I have admitted to my tweet already
Gonsalves: Please see the part on the hate mongers. The people have been released on bail. Just see Milord what this country has come to. The person who exposes it is in jail and the person continuing is on bail.
Gonsalves: These hate mongers made remarks on constitution, judges and what not. This is what I did. I exposed this kind of venomous language against judges, constitution etc. I am in jail for this !
Gonsalves: Please see what AG KK Venugopal said on this video on a request to initiate contempt plea. He said that those who believe in the institution will die a death by seeing all this. Zubair exposed it and he is now in jail. I admit it to what I said.
Gonsalves: Please see Section 295A IPC. How is it applicable to me? I was in fact defending this. Now please see Section 67 of IT Act. Even that is not applicable..it's against obscene material
Gonsalves: Please see the clamour in country. Take this phone that phone. This is the co-director of Alt News, one of the prestigious agency tracking hate speech and sending people to jail.
Gonsalves: this man is in jail and he should be released immediately and should be sent home. Please see the parts where they have put a picture of him and say "Goli Maarne Wale ko Ek Laakh ka Inaam" !
Gonsalves: HC order finding says that the matter was at premature stage and evidence had to be gathered and then court on basis of this can decide one way or other. But here I had admitted to the FIR
This is a point missed by HC. #ZubairArrest@zoo_bear@AltNews#SupremeCourt
Gonsalves: Court says there is prima facie case for offences. How is this an offence under Section 67 of IT Act or 295A of IPC. Where is the offence ? If there is no offence then why he is in custody. That's what Bhajan Lal judgment is all about. Where is obscenity or religion?
Justice Banerjee: The screenshots you showed us. Is there anything other than these tweets ?
SG: I appear for state of UP and ASG SV Raju for the IO. This is not a question of one tweet or other. It is to see whether he is part of syndicate to put out such tweets to destabilize the society. Let me point out facts which are suppressed by fact checker.
SG: He has been arrested by Delhi police and Delhi court refused bail as there is some money angle since money has been received from some foreign countries. This info was suppressed. HC did not grant any interim relief. He is in jail thus
SG: Section 67 of the IT Act has been dropped by the police officers in the Sitapur FIR. We argued before the UP Court and after this tweet there was a law and order situation. The person Yati Narsinghnanad was arrested and released. I am not defending him.
SG: UP court remanding him to custody has been suppressed.
Justice Banerjee: perhaps it is not bail rejection but only remand
SG: There are two orders. Delhi court refused bail and here in UP too bail was rejected and remand was granted.
SG: SLP is not a regular appeal it is a discretion we invoke of this court. Thus such suppression is important. He is in police custody by an elaborate reasoned order.
SG: All these suppressions and saying Section 67 is not made out. We have only charged Section 153A. Now he suppresses all of this and claims to be fact checker! There is something more than what meets the eye.
SG: Speeches by Yati Narsinghnanad etc were hate speeches and they were arrested and they were in jail. I am not disputing consent by AG Venugopal. He was right in that.
Gonsalves: for 153A i have to promote the enmity between religions. If i tell the police about such speeches then it is not promoting enemity but promoting secularism. Sorry solicitor This section does not apply to me. #ZubairArrest@zoo_bear@AltNews#SupremeCourt
SG: His overall conduct is being criminally investigated. It is not just this one tweet. He is a habitual offender.
Gonsalves interrupts
SG: We are not in a TV debate. I don't go there
Justice Maheshwari: The Allahabad HC order is on which FIR? Which police registered it ?
ASG Raju: It was registered by the UP police. Local police station.
SC: SG please show us whether offence on 295A was made out or not ?
ASG Raju: I am for the investigating officer. 1. Please see Section 67 has been dropped. I will show how 295A has been made out. He has not written to police, he is tweeting it so that everyone sees it and then violence is incited.
ASG:Mahant Bajrang is a respected religious leader in Sitapur. once you call him a hate monger then it invites violence. There is no scope of intention here under Section 482 Petition. We have to look at his devices and that is why we are going to Bangalore and remand was granted
ASG: Please see Section 295.. yes outrage of religious feelings was there of this Bajrangi Baba. Whether intention there or not it is a scope of investigation. You call a spiritual leader a hate monger and you outrage religious feelings
ASG: There is an attempt to promote disharmony and Ill will among religious groups. If you are such a nice person then you should not have tweeted and sent a letter to UP police. That fact that he has tweeted has created the offence.
ASG: If he is granted bail and remand rejected then he can destroy evidence in Bangalore. Such quashing petitions are not listed in vacations
Justice Banerjee: He says there is deprivation of liberty. In such a case you cannot say that there is no urgency.
SG: Please see the application. Delhi court has given police custody remand, rejected bail, nothing has been mentioned. This affiavit was filed yersterday and he does not mention that he was taken on transit remand order from Delhi to UP
SG: He has not mentioned any of these facts. These are deliberate and wilful suppression. You cannot play with system like this. It is too early a stage for interference when HC says there is a prima facie case
ASG: There is a prima facie case on Section 295A and 153 of IPC. Police custody is on and bail plea is rejected. HC has also noted it's a premature stage. SC must hold that this is not a fit case for interference now
Gonsalves: Nowadays everything is not about letters. The seers had commented on religious leaders saying Muslim women should be kidnapped and raped. Sitapur police replied even when it was 5 days had passed and said probe was on.
Gonsalves: Bajrang Munni Das had said that Muslim women should be raped if Hindu women are teased by Muslim men. NCW had taken cognisance as well
Justice Banerjee: This is Bajrang Munni, what about others ?
SG: Petitioner has deleted many tweets. This is the modus operandi
Gonsalves: I who ask police to take action is in jail. What shocking state of affairs.
SG: But you are already arrested .. this is not helping you
Gonsalves: I have called them hate mongers. Whole country and press also calls them hate mongers
What is wrong in this?
Justice Banerjee: Let the matter be posted before a regular bench. We will grant protection for few days on condition that you will not leave jurisdiction of this court and you will not put up more tweets. We will grant you interim bail for few days
ASG: let the effect of bail be after remand is over
SG: He is also in judicial custody by Delhi police. That order is not under challenge here
SC: We are only on this case
BREAKING:
SC: We issue notice.
SG: Let me present facts by Monday and defer interim relief on Monday.
SC: We are not interfering with any other order except what is before us. Matter be listed before appropriate regular bench.
SC: The order of the JMFC July 7, 2022, Sitapur be translated into English and filed in court along with order rejecting the prayer of bail. In the mean petitioner shall be granted interim order of bail for a period of 5 days on conditions to be imposed by JMFC @zoo_bear@AltNews
SC: The conditions of Sitapur court to include condition that Petitioner shall not tweet and he will not leave the jurisdiction of court of the first judicial magistrate.
SG: Then he has to come to Delhi and surrender in Delhi.
Gonsalves: we will right away
SC: Then we will say not leave Delhi.
Ld SG submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody in Delhi. We order that the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of Delhi. We are making it clear this interim bail in relation to the Sitapur FIR
SG: please say Delhi otherwise he will get bail in Delhi case
SC: this order is only on Sitapur FIR and not any other FIR
SC: Petitioner to not tamper any electronic evidence in Bangalore or anywhere else. SG submits that he is in judicial custody in Delhi with respect to another offence. This order is concerned only with Sitapur FIR @zoo_bear@AltNews#SupremeCourt
ASG: Please say that the order will not hamper seizure of laptop etc?
SC: Did we stay the investigation? No. List this matter before a regular bench.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by @ZeeNews anchor Rohit Ranjan challenging multiple FIRs registered against him over an alleged doctored video of Rahul Gandhi's speech @RahulGandhi#RohitRanjan
Sr Adv Siddharth Luthra: Latest FIR is Noida FIR. Second FIR is in Jaipur and their FIR is in Chattisgarh
Justice Banerjee: same offence ?
Luthra: Yes
Justice Banerjee: Then it is covered by TT Antony judgment
Luthra: That is my submission
Luthra: one inadvertent error was made and show was taken off air.
Mumbai Court has begun hearing remand of 7 accused persons arrested by NIA for allegedly murdering a pharmacist who posted content supportint suspended BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma’s Prophet remark.
Application filed in Bombay High Court seeks transfer of investigation into murder comrade Govind Pansare to the Maharashtra ATS to investigate who the mastermind in the attack is.
Adv Abhay Nevagi for Pansare claimed before Bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and VG Bisht that there is a larger conspiracy in the murders of Pansare along with Narendra Dabholkar, MM Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh which ought to be investigated.
Alt News Fact Checker Muhammad Zubair case reaches Supreme Court
Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: His job is to fact check news. There are death threats against him and people who deliver hate speech says that they might kill him
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions of the Kerala government and an actress, who has alleged rape by Malayalam actor-producer Vijay Babu challenging the grant of anticipatory bail to him by the Kerala High Court #VijayBabu
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta for State Kerala: The plea is against anticipatory bail. The FIR is against a senior actor who is accused of continuously raping a junior actor. He fled to Dubai immediately after this and committed another offence by disclosing name of victim in social media
Gupta: Before coming to India he filed a Section 438 CrPc application. When blue corner notice was issued against him, he fled to Georgia which does not come under extradition treaty. After his passport was impounded he came to Dubai
#SupremeCourt to today hear plea by Goa govt challenging June 28 Bombay High Court order calling for panchayat polls within 45 days instead of after the monsoons as the State had decided.