Big Serge ☦️🇺🇸🇷🇺 Profile picture
Jul 8, 2022 32 tweets 12 min read Read on X
Thread: The Russo-Japanese War

In 1904, Russia and Japan fought a war over Korea and China. This was a large conflict that threatened to shape the future of east Asia for centuries - but curiously, it was never organically resolved. Let's take a look at this war together. (1) Image
We'll begin with the Russian decisions that led to war, which begin with the emergence of a critical technology: railroads. Rail was revolutionary because it allowed for the integration and exploitation of continental interiors and land based territories. (2) Image
The biggest beneficiaries of rail were always going to be continental scale states with far flung but resource rich territories. Two states in particular fit the bill: the USA and Russia. Rail finally gave Russia a way to economically exploit its vast territories in Asia. (3) Image
Rail expansion in Russia was spearheaded by Finance Minister Sergei Witte - the original Big Serge! His crowning achievement in this sphere was the Trans Siberian Railroad, which finally gave Russia an efficient transit link to the far east of their empire. (4) Image
Witte also saw rail as a way to get access to the Chinese market. In 1900, Qing China had the 2nd largest economy in the world, and Witte coveted economic linkages there. He even negotiated a deal with the Qing to run part of the rail line through Manchuria. (5) Image
All of this was cozy and clean - however, matters were complicated by military contingencies. While Witte pursued economic goals, the Russian foreign affairs ministry was worried about protecting the Russian far east by procuring strategic locations and bases. (6) Image
Enter Japan.

Japan completed a breakneck modernization and militarization program under the Meiji Emperor, and in 1895 it was time for Japan to announce itself. They absolutely crushed Qing China in a war that year. The Japanese Empire had arrived. (7) Image
Having beaten China, Japan took as its prizes the Korean peninsula, Formosa (modern Taiwan), and the Liadong Peninsula - home of the strategically valuable Port Arthur. These were rich spoils - but Japan's party was soon spoiled by the pesky Europeans. (8) Image
The imperial powers of Europe were highly interested in the fate of China, and were not enthused at the idea that Japan was getting involved. A coalition of European powers imposed upon Japan an altered deal wherein Japan only got to keep Formosa. (9) Image
This was deeply insulting to the Japanese, who felt they had been robbed of territories that were fairly won in war. The insult became even more unbearable in 1897, when Russia took Port Arthur for itself and based their Pacific Fleet there. (10) Image
Matters came to a head in 1900, with the famous Boxer Rebellion in China. This was a violent, anti-European uprising, which provoked a coalition of British, French, Russia, German, and even American troops to deploy to China to protect westerners in Beijing. (11) Image
The problem for Japan was that, after the Boxer Rebellion was over, the Russian troops didn't leave. Instead, 100,000 Russians were based in Manchuria. Japan felt that it had been cheated out of Korea and was now going to be boxed out of Manchuria as well. (12) Image
They demanded that Russia withdraw from Manchuria. Had they done so, war would probably have been averted. Unfortunately, Tsar Nicholas II was getting rather bad advice from military advisors who told him the Japanese could not fight. Witte, who advocate peace, was ignored. (13) Image
Furthermore, Tsar Nicholas was being egged on by his cousin, Kaiser Wilhelm, who badly wanted Russia to be diverted towards Asia. He talked up a fear of the "yellow menace" and wrote letters encouraging Nicholas to fight the "Asiatics". (14) Image
The general assumption was that Japan simply could not match a European military. The Tsar at one point remarked, "it is a barbarous country." The idea of a war with Japan was viewed rather flippantly.

This made Japan's surprise attack on February 8, 1904, a huge surprise. (15) Image
The surprise attack on Port Arthur failed to destroy the Russian forces there, but Japan was able to put the fortress under siege - blocking the exits and hauling heavy artillery onto nearby hills to pound the fortifications. More important still was the shock and momentum. (16) Image
In early May, the Japanese army defeated a Russian advance guard at the Yalu River, which opened the way for a full scale invasion of Manchuria. Russia was now in a very difficult strategic position. (17) Image
Port Arthur was under siege, but Japan's army in Manchuria blocked the rail lines and essentially cut off Russia's pacific coast from reinforcement or rescue. To save Port Arthur, Russia needed to dislodge Japan from Manchuria. (18) Image
The attempt to do so led to the colossal Battle of Mukden - a brutal, bloody slog that led to Russian defeat and nearly 88,000 Russian casualties. The setback at Mukden essentially ended any hopes of rescuing Port Arthur via the land approach. (19) Image
The only option left was to go by sea. Russia's Baltic Fleet was dispatched on a globe spanning journey. They needed to sail thousands of miles, around the whole of Europe and Asia, before engaging the Japanese Navy and rescuing the Russian Far East. (20) Image
As if the trip were not long enough, a skittish Russian captain opened fire on a British fishing ship in the North Sea - fantastically imagining that it was a Japanese destroyer. An irate London closed the Suez Canal to the Russians, forcing them to go around Africa as well. (21) Image
Port Arthur surrendered in December, 1904 - well before the Baltic Fleet arrived. But Russia was determined to score a victory and make the trip worthwhile. Instead, after an 18,000 mile voyage, the Russian squadron was smashed at Tsushima Strait. (22) Image
Japan achieved the dream of naval warfare: a scenario known as "crossing the T." The Japanese fleet was able to come perpendicular to the Russian squadron, allowing all the Japanese guns to open fire at once before the Russians could deploy into formation. (23) Image
Six of Russia's most modern battleships went to the bottom. The Baltic Fleet was smashed, Port Arthur captured, and the Russian army was stonewalled in Manchuria. Upstart Japan had defeated Russia on land and sea. (24) Image
There were other, even more pressing problems for Russia. In January, 1905, widespread labor strikes began to spread throughout Petersburg. When police killed protestors on January 22 - infamous "Bloody Sunday" - Russia exploded into open civil unrest and revolution. (25) Image
The Revolution of 1905 had huge geopolitical consequences. In fact, it occurred just as the war was on the verge of swinging in Russia's favor. Japan had won all the battles, but they were on the verge of bankruptcy and their forces were badly chewed up. (26) Image
Russia had a freshly raised army due to deploy to the east which in all likelihood would have swung the war back in their favor. Instead, these troops were needed to quell civil unrest, and Nicholas was forced to sue for peace. (27) Image
To negotiate a deal, he brought back Sergei Witte - whom he had previously ignored when war was on the table. The negotiations were mediated by Theodore Roosevelt, who won a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. (28) Image
The Treaty of Portsmouth recognized Japanese influence in Korea, but spared Russia having to pay reparations. Manchuria was given back to Qing China. Russia actually did very well from these negotiations, considering the troubled domestic situation. (29) Image
Importantly, however, this was a war that was not satisfactorily concluded. Russia was unable to fight the war to the finish due to civil unrest, and Japan felt they'd been cheated again by missing out on Manchuria and a Russian indemnity. (30) Image
This is why the friction zone between these powers remained troubled for decades. Japan would again invade Manchuria in 1931, and hold it the final destruction of their empire in 1945 at the hands of the Americans. (31) Image
The true conclusion of the Russo-Japanese war wasn't in 1905, but in August, 1945, when the Red Army invaded Japanese Manchuria, and the Bear at last devoured the Rising Sun. (32) Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Big Serge ☦️🇺🇸🇷🇺

Big Serge ☦️🇺🇸🇷🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @witte_sergei

Mar 21
This is a slop post, but there's a broader problem with the way people try to score cheap points by pointing out things like the life expectancy issue, the HIV rate, alcoholism, etc. These issues are very telling as to why Russians feel the way they do about Putin and the USSR.
Westerners broadly misunderstand how the collapse of the USSR was experienced in places like Russia and Ukraine. The implosion of the Soviet economy was not a pleasant experience in any way, and the country did not make a clean transition, either politically or economically.
All the generally understood problems with the Soviet planned economy were true. Soviet central planning was more wasteful, less dynamic, less innovative, and created less wealth than western market economies. All that being said, the system largely "worked."
Read 11 tweets
Feb 24
Very blackpilling when you learn that Viking Berserkers didn’t really exist in the sense that people generally think. I wish they did, but they didn’t.
Ah, screw it. Berserker thread starts here.
"Berserk" as a word comes from "Serk", which meant shirt, with either "bear" or "bare" attached to it, giving the image of either a warrior with ursine regalia or else unarmored, possibly even naked.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 27
Thread: Clausewitz's Trinity of War

Carl von Clausewitz is among the most widely known and cited (if not widely read) theorists of war. His signature work, "On War" (published in 1832) is the source of many commonplace expressions and terms that permiate the modern lexicon. (1) Image
Clausewitz was the originator of concepts like "friction", "culmination", "the fog of war", and more. His comment that "war is the continuation of policy with other means" has been endlessly quoted. Like a Shakespeare, he undergirds much of our modern vocabulary of war. (2) Image
Clausewitz is widely known, but perhaps not so widely read. Despite its influence, "On War" is an opaque and disorderly text. This is largely because Clausewitz died while his writing was still in an unorganized draft. The published volume was edited by his wife, Marie. (3) Image
Read 25 tweets
Dec 18, 2024
Thread: Verdun and the Lure of Attrition

This December 18th marks the 108th anniversary of the end of the Battle of Verdun - an infamously bloody episode of the First World War which killed over 700,000 French and German troops over nearly ten months of fighting. (1) Image
Verdun in many ways was the seminal First World War battle, in that it churned up dozens of divisions fighting for apparently meager gains of just a few kilometers. It appears at first brush to be entirely senseless, but the strategic conception deserves close scrutiny. (2) Image
By the end of 1915, German hopes for a quick resolution to the war had been firmly dashed. The initial command cadre had been replaced, and General Erich von Falkenhayn had taken command of the German general staff with an unenviable strategic position. (3) Image
Read 31 tweets
Nov 6, 2024
Robert Drews book on the Bronze Age Collapse is one of my absolute favorites, and it's one that I find myself thinking about a lot with the advent of cheap FPV drones as a military expedient, as seen in Ukraine. (1) Image
Drews basic argument is that the collapse of rich and stable late bronze age societies was due to the advent of new technical and tactical methodologies which made the aristocratic chariot armies of the day obsolete. (2)
Warfare in the bronze age centered on armies comprised principally of chariots deployed as mobile archery platforms, with infantry playing a subordinate role as auxiliaries and security troops. (3)
Read 8 tweets
Oct 14, 2024
Maybe instead of arguing online about Columbus/Indigenous Peoples Day, you read this excellent book? This dismisses the myth of the helpless native and presents a coherent story of the European encounter with North America. Image
The key theme here is that Europeans didn’t encounter a virginal land occupied by naïve peoples. North America already had a scheme of geopolitics, with diplomatic protocols, alliance systems, and warfare.
Native Americans by and large did not see Europeans as alien intruders, but as a new chess piece in this power system. Europeans were integrated into the diplomatic web, and native tribes tried to leverage them against each other.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(