1. How many times does someone says “including others doesn’t hurt you”? We hear it all day long.
They are wrong. They know it. They don’t want you to know it.
2. Let’s start here. When women are a subset of women they cannot lay claim to anything that was separately a woman’s. In one linguistic sleight of hand, women have lost their individuality that determines who has control of something. Be it sports or prison or their name.
3. Now the woman is just a grumpy member of the group trying to keep something away from other WOMEN.
EVERY reason why we have separate spaces women is instantly wiped out with this trick. We are stunned.
We try to explain. We are sure it’s a misunderstanding.
4. We try to justify why we have separate spaces. We explain desperately about things we all knew five minutes ago.
We are sure they just don’t get it. As we explain power differential we
5 are called shrill or mean. Or worse they get endless accusations of NAMALT (not all men are like that).
And why are we doing this? To justify our right to get our OWN stuff. We beg for our own stuff back. We try to explain why we should have our own stuff.
6. And all because with one linguistic move, women have ceased to be an entity entitled to their OWN things. It’s the ultimate takeover.
Property belongs to the owner. If you get the clerk to add a name to the title of your home, you no longer own it.
7. This is actually a thing thieves do. They change the title on your home. (Check periodically). It’s sinister because it is effective.
That’s what TWAW does. It changes the name on the title.
8. And since the phrase is trans women are women and women are cis women, the TW now gains the prominent and controlling place on the title. The women are just cis women. A subset. A minor player. With no rights at all. Full control has been turned over.
9. But the game is not complete. For women are powerful and can speak up. Who would let them take their stuff without complaint?
So now we get to the second genius move. The way to shut women up. We are told we are hateful if we object to having our own stuff taken.
10. We are now just a member of the group taking OTHER’S stuff. Now it is fully theirs. They are entitled to it. We are excluding them from THEIR stuff. It is akin to racism. It is ingroup superiority and it cannot be allowed.
Do you see what they have done?
11. You are now a terrible person if you object to the thief inserting his name on the title of your own home against your will. The home you worked for. Paid for.
You are now begging to be allowed a piece of it. Maybe we can compromise you, plead. You want to be nice.
12. And when you beg for someone to recognize you as a full being, you are told the mantra again. It is now solidified. You are no longer you.
It has been declared.
And If you DARE even name this as men taking over women’s stuff, you are called a bigot,
13. or a transphobe. You cannot name the thing being done to you or by whom it was done. Especially the latter. You cannot state this is the more physically powerful group taking something from the less physically powerful. That is absolutely taboo.
14. Social media will punish you. You will be ostracized. You will be silenced if you push it.
For simply naming what has happened to you, you are punished.
What can you do?
15. Refuse the game the best you can. Refuse the linguistic sleight of hand. Call it out. Make it clear. Say no.
16. Forced inclusivity does harm you.
This isn’t about civil rights this is about property rights. Ownership. Control. That’s the linguistic game here.
17. No one has a civil right to take your stuff away from you. They don’t have a right to include themselves in your spaces, races, or places. They are yours. You earned them.
Say no.
N. 🟥
O. 🔴
🟥🔴
18. Addendum: See. Here is the perfect example. Now it is called cis supremacy if women have their own stuff. (This discussion is about rape shelters btw. They don’t even want women having those.). See how the game works?
19. For the gaslighting people who say no one is taking the word female away from you. It’s gone too. In the new language there are no words for women to speak of themselves.
20. Remove language from a group and you have achieved total subjugation over them. Try it. Try to speak of women’s issues in this new language. It can’t be done. You can’t speak of women, or even females now. These words no longer have the meaning you are trying to convey.
21. Remember I said you try desperately to explain things we all know? Don’t. They know perfectly well why you’re saying what you are. They use your own discomfort to gaslight you and make you angry. It’s a power play.
Don’t play their game.
22. Do you see how this works? The women inmates are so unimportant they don’t even have a descriptor. If they are dehumanized then it is ok to house them with anyone who seeks to be housed with them. They are background noise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You’ve heard how people say terrible things about JK Rowling and what an awful person she is? It stems from the fact that she calls a man a man. That’s it. That is the crime of the century.
Seriously. They demand she pretend men are women and she won’t. 1/
I can’t stress enough. That’s what all the hullabaloo is over. They say that she is denying a man’s humanity by calling him a man. That’s IT.
This is upside down and inside out.
She couldn’t be humanizing him more by recognizing his actual humanity. 2/
Don’t be fooled by any of this. Of course there is nothing wrong with recognizing an adult male human being as an adult male human being. Of course it’s not denying his humanity. It’s silly to say otherwise. So why do they do it? Why say such a ridiculous thing? 3/
The man on the right and two others are suing England Hockey bc they dared to say women’s hockey is for females. They created an open category for him. But that isn’t his cup of tea.
He also says 1/
Yes, he does use the changing room with all the women. Since no one has said anything to him he assumes that means that all the women are fine with it. 2/
He will punish England Hockey
for daring to have a female only category. The punishment is the legal process. He is trying to raise £100,000 for the legal costs. How can clubs survive vexatious lawsuits like these? 3/
I’m speechless here. Not only did John Oliver belittle Payton McNabb for getting hurt by a male volleyball player but here he calls her vile names for calling out a man in the ladies room!
What???????
1/
He has the audacity to say the man crossing women’s boundaries isn’t doing anything?!!!!
When did it become to perfectly ok to violate women’s privacy?
It’s like we are in anti Me Too world. 2/
He focuses the whole world on this young lady and calls her nasty. That’s low.
What is going on??????
Of all people to go after!! He goes after the girl who was seriously injured bc they let a boy play against her!!!
She is still dealing with the effects of that hit.
You know Payton McNabb. She is the young lady who was bashed so hard with a volleyball hit by a male player that she got seriously hurt.
Here is John Oliver going after her. She’s a young girl and John Oliver is attacking her! 1/
Seriously, can we all stop and appreciate the situation here. John Oliver is minimizing what happened to her. He can’t address the issue that having men in women’s sports is dangerous, so he belittles a young girl, a teenager at the time, who was seriously injured by a boy. 2/
She did nothing but GET HURT and has to shame her on his show.
This is so low, folks. So down and dirty. He is putting her in danger to push an ideology that is indefensible on its own terms. 3/
For some reason the left’s hill seems to be getting men into women’s sports. And denying it’s happening.
I have no idea why they want to do the former, but they want to do the latter bc it’s so unpopular. Or shall I say enraging?
Enter John Oliver. 1/
The UN has put out a statement saying there are hundreds of men in women’s sports. If you’ve been paying the slightest bit of attention, you know. You see it every week. Another guy somewhere has taken a place from women in sports. Just this week we saw three. 2/
So what is a political group to do that is pushing something that NO ONE wants? They have to deny it. And hard!
They try to say it’s not happening by forcing sports groups into NOT keeping records. If no one keeps track, it isn’t happening, right? 3/
A very activist Montana judge has temporarily blocked a bill (HB 121) that was signed into law protecting women’s privacy in bathrooms.
The reasoning is spectacular. Just wait for this:
1/
The judge found there is no evidence that it protects women’s privacy to keep men out of women’s bathrooms!
Um….excuse me. What does this judge think women want privacy from? 2/
This is a bit technical legally but the court finds that TG status is a suspect class which gets special protection. Why? Bc equal treatment on the basis of s*x is a fundamental right.
But genderism isn’t ON the basis of s*x at all!!!!! Talk about mixing up concepts. 3/