1. How many times does someone says “including others doesn’t hurt you”? We hear it all day long.
They are wrong. They know it. They don’t want you to know it.
2. Let’s start here. When women are a subset of women they cannot lay claim to anything that was separately a woman’s. In one linguistic sleight of hand, women have lost their individuality that determines who has control of something. Be it sports or prison or their name.
3. Now the woman is just a grumpy member of the group trying to keep something away from other WOMEN.
EVERY reason why we have separate spaces women is instantly wiped out with this trick. We are stunned.
We try to explain. We are sure it’s a misunderstanding.
4. We try to justify why we have separate spaces. We explain desperately about things we all knew five minutes ago.
We are sure they just don’t get it. As we explain power differential we
5 are called shrill or mean. Or worse they get endless accusations of NAMALT (not all men are like that).
And why are we doing this? To justify our right to get our OWN stuff. We beg for our own stuff back. We try to explain why we should have our own stuff.
6. And all because with one linguistic move, women have ceased to be an entity entitled to their OWN things. It’s the ultimate takeover.
Property belongs to the owner. If you get the clerk to add a name to the title of your home, you no longer own it.
7. This is actually a thing thieves do. They change the title on your home. (Check periodically). It’s sinister because it is effective.
That’s what TWAW does. It changes the name on the title.
8. And since the phrase is trans women are women and women are cis women, the TW now gains the prominent and controlling place on the title. The women are just cis women. A subset. A minor player. With no rights at all. Full control has been turned over.
9. But the game is not complete. For women are powerful and can speak up. Who would let them take their stuff without complaint?
So now we get to the second genius move. The way to shut women up. We are told we are hateful if we object to having our own stuff taken.
10. We are now just a member of the group taking OTHER’S stuff. Now it is fully theirs. They are entitled to it. We are excluding them from THEIR stuff. It is akin to racism. It is ingroup superiority and it cannot be allowed.
Do you see what they have done?
11. You are now a terrible person if you object to the thief inserting his name on the title of your own home against your will. The home you worked for. Paid for.
You are now begging to be allowed a piece of it. Maybe we can compromise you, plead. You want to be nice.
12. And when you beg for someone to recognize you as a full being, you are told the mantra again. It is now solidified. You are no longer you.
It has been declared.
And If you DARE even name this as men taking over women’s stuff, you are called a bigot,
13. or a transphobe. You cannot name the thing being done to you or by whom it was done. Especially the latter. You cannot state this is the more physically powerful group taking something from the less physically powerful. That is absolutely taboo.
14. Social media will punish you. You will be ostracized. You will be silenced if you push it.
For simply naming what has happened to you, you are punished.
What can you do?
15. Refuse the game the best you can. Refuse the linguistic sleight of hand. Call it out. Make it clear. Say no.
16. Forced inclusivity does harm you.
This isn’t about civil rights this is about property rights. Ownership. Control. That’s the linguistic game here.
17. No one has a civil right to take your stuff away from you. They don’t have a right to include themselves in your spaces, races, or places. They are yours. You earned them.
Say no.
N. 🟥
O. 🔴
🟥🔴
18. Addendum: See. Here is the perfect example. Now it is called cis supremacy if women have their own stuff. (This discussion is about rape shelters btw. They don’t even want women having those.). See how the game works?
19. For the gaslighting people who say no one is taking the word female away from you. It’s gone too. In the new language there are no words for women to speak of themselves.
20. Remove language from a group and you have achieved total subjugation over them. Try it. Try to speak of women’s issues in this new language. It can’t be done. You can’t speak of women, or even females now. These words no longer have the meaning you are trying to convey.
21. Remember I said you try desperately to explain things we all know? Don’t. They know perfectly well why you’re saying what you are. They use your own discomfort to gaslight you and make you angry. It’s a power play.
Don’t play their game.
22. Do you see how this works? The women inmates are so unimportant they don’t even have a descriptor. If they are dehumanized then it is ok to house them with anyone who seeks to be housed with them. They are background noise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While everyone was out here arguing over the definition of woman, Merriam Webster snuck in and stealthily changed the definition of female. So even if they lose and say a woman is an adult human female, they have taken over that too.
This is how they take over everything. 1/
Yes, they say sure, a woman is an adult female person. But now they have altered the definition of female!!
They have transed every species!!! A female cat has an identity now?
At least they seemed to admit there are only two with female being the opposite of male. 2/
Before you ask, they did the same with male. It’s an identity that is the opposite of female.
Even in their ideology this makes no sense. So don’t tell me this is an organic way of describing a changing language. 3/
Re: A male employee in a department store who went up to a young teen in the intimates section and asked her if she needed help.
What people don’t understand about predators or their supporters is how much they think they are victims. That surprised me. 1/
You’ll get a million excuses and always the girl gets blamed. They will pretend they are innocent saints. “He was just being helpful.” “What? What did he do?” “It’s just clothes!” “No one but you would object.”
And the rag€… 2/
So much rag€ at anyone that objects.
The rag€ to get you to stop objecting. If at first the cajoling doesn’t work and the innocent game doesn’t work then they move on to rag€. Pure unadulterated rag€. 3/
Imagine a man walked up to young teen in a lingerie section to ask if she needed help.
No decent man would do this. Indecent men pretend this is just “being helpful”.
You can tell instantly who is who by their reaction to this situation. 1/
Predators don’t come up to you twirling their mustache. They come up to you smiling. When caught they have plausible deniability. “Who me? I was just being nice! I didn’t do anything! I just offered that little girl some candy bc she looked scared! I was helping her!” 2/
They really don’t like older women bc we see right through them. They love kids. They can fool kids.
Underneath the smile is something dark and sinister. They immediately become enraged with anyone calling them out. Other predators often come to their support. 3/
The barrister for Mr Tickle is saying that Sall is not allowed to demonstrate a willful blindness with respect to gender identity.
Please understand where this law stuff is going. They are saying that you MUST believe that men can turn into women.
1/
This is what pronouns take you to. This is what it means when you say that women are a subset of women. The law being argued for is to say that you MUST believe this gender ideology.
That’s what is being fought here. 2/
Do you want it to be ILLEGAL for you to think this is a man?