Remember that executive order that Trump wrote to protect women’s sports? Well, the NCAA (the biggest college sports assoc there is) wrote a new policy that pretends to comply with the new rules but really doesn’t. They are giving Trump a giant middle finger. Here is how. 1/ Oh, it sounds nice. They say that men can’t play on women’s teams. That’s is good. Right? Except…. 2/

BREAKING. OMG!

Nurse Sandie Peggie has now been threatened to be fired because she knows a man is a man! The vindictive man in question, Dr. Upton, used the ladies changing room and is throwing a petulant fit bc Sandie dared to want a ladies only ladies changing room. 1/ The hospital, who is being sued bc they let a man use the ladies changing room, has now decided to subject the nurse to further disciplinary proceedings! Not the man who walked into the ladies changing room. They are going after HER! 2/

If only it was so easy. Dan, and others, think all we need to do is say no and all of these men will leave our private spaces. Except that isn’t what happens.

We say no and they argue with us. They call us names. They threaten us. And then they do what they want. 1/ This is a typical response. These men will just walk into our private spaces.

So now what do you suggest we do? In some places they have made it the law that we can’t even argue with them. Any man at all can come into our spaces and we just have to put up with it. 2/

When I first got into all of this I, like everyone else, wanted to be kind. I was happy to use whatever language anyone wanted. Sure. Why not?

But then something changed. We call it “peaking”. For me it was a story about a women’s r*p* shelter.

1/ I couldn’t quite believe what I was seeing. People were angry at a shelter??? Huh? Then I discovered it was a particular group of men who were furious at the shelter for being for women.

Again. Huh????

2/

Most people have no idea how bad it was for those women swimmers who had to change all their clothes in front of William “Lia” Thomas and see him waltz around displaying his franks and beans.

They psychologically tormented these girls in order to force this on them.

1/
Most people think that these men have altered their bodies. The overwhelming majority of them have not. (Over 90% still have the bait and tackle.)

I hope those three women who are suing for pain and emotional distress get every penny those Ivy League schools have. 2/

BREAKING. Huge lawsuit! Thread.

Three swimmers from Penn are suing the Ivy League and the NCAA for allowing a male (William “Lia” Thomas) to be in their changing room while they were completely nude and then allowing him to compete against them! 1/ 2. They seek damages for “pain and suffering, mental and emotional distress, suffering and anxiety, expenses costs and other damages.”

In case you didn’t know, these schools really allowed that man into their changing room and provided the ladies with no other place to change.

THREAD

OMG!!!

I just got scolded by Gr*k!!!! I got told to use she/her pronouns for a man!!

I swear I got chills as I imagined this being said in the Hal computer voice.

1/ 2/. This is just the beginning of the conversion!

BREAKING thread.

The thing we are told doesn’t happen has happened again. Bc of course it has. We all know what happens when you give these types a way to access women and girls easily. The man said he was a woman and therefore he got in. 1/ Notice the carefully worded statement from Arlington Public Schools.

He was let in no problem. It was ONLY when they discovered that he was a registered SO that they kicked him out.

So, if he hadn’t had been convicted before it would have been no problem having him there? 2

Another thing this executive order did was rescind gender guidance Biden had pushed through to schools.

Get ready for this list. Most people had no idea his administration had done all of this.

A thread. Rescinded:
(i)    “The White House Toolkit on Transgender Equality”;

(ii)   the Department of Education’s guidance documents including:

(A)  “2024 Title IX Regulations: Pointers for Implementation” (July 2024);

(Biden had his education dept rewrite Title IX to include gender identity. Basically, this made it so that schools couldn’t have women only showers or sports or anything. Neither could the boys. This document was an explanation to the schools on all the ways they would have to reorganize to let boys into girls’ spaces and vice versa).

I just posted the entire executive order. This will be the TL:Dr version. But it is so good and there is so much that you cannot miss that it will be long too. You must read!

I swear I was tearing up reading this. It’s been so long since anyone spoke the truth. Here we go: Section 1.  Purpose.  Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers.

This is wrong.

(YESSSSSSSS!!!)

The executive order in its entirety:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers.  

This is wrong.

Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being.  The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system.  

Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself.

This unhealthy road is paved by an ongoing and purposeful attack against the ordinary and longstanding use and understanding of biological and scientific terms, replacing the immutable biological reality of sex with an internal, fluid, and subjective sense of self unmoored from biological facts. 

Invalidating the true and biological category of “woman” improperly transforms laws and policies designed to protect sex-based opportunities into laws and policies that undermine them, replacing longstanding, cherished legal rights and values with an identity-based, inchoate social concept.

Accordingly, my Administration will defend women’s rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male. 

Sec. 2.  Policy and Definitions.  It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female.  These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.  

Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality, and the following definitions shall govern all Executive interpretation of and application of Federal law and administration policy:

(a)  “Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female.  “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”

(b)  “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

(c)  “Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.

(d)  “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

(e)  “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.

(f)  “Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true.

Gender ideology includes the idea that there is a vast spectrum of genders that are disconnected from one’s sex. 

Gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but nevertheless maintains that it is possible for a person to be born in the wrong sexed body.

(g)  “Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex. Sec. 3.  Recognizing Women Are Biologically Distinct From Men.  

(a)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide to the U.S. Government, external partners, and the public clear guidance expanding on the sex-based definitions set forth in this order.

(b)  Each agency and all Federal employees shall enforce laws governing sex-based rights, protections, opportunities, and accommodations to protect men and women as biologically distinct sexes.  

Each agency should therefore give the terms “sex”, “male”, “female”, “men”, “women”, “boys” and “girls” the meanings set forth in section 2 of this order when interpreting or applying statutes, regulations, or guidance and in all other official agency business, documents, and communications.

(c)  When administering or enforcing sex-based distinctions, every agency and all Federal employees acting in an official capacity on behalf of their agency shall use the term “sex” and not “gender” in all applicable Federal policies and documents.

(d)  The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall implement changes to require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards, accurately reflect the holder’s sex, as defined under section 2 of this order; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall ensure that applicable personnel records accurately report Federal employees’ sex, as defined by section 2 of this order.

(e)  Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages.  

Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. 

Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.

(f)  The prior Administration argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which addressed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, requires gender identity-based access to single-sex spaces under, for example, Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act. 

This position is legally untenable and has harmed women. 

The Attorney General shall therefore immediately issue guidance to agencies to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions in agency activities. 

In addition, the Attorney General shall issue guidance and assist agencies in protecting sex-based distinctions, which are explicitly permitted under Constitutional and statutory precedent.

(g)  Federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology.  Each agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.

Sec. 4.  Privacy in Intimate Spaces. 

(a)  The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers, including through amendment, as necessary, of Part 115.41 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations and interpretation guidance regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act.

(b)  The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall prepare and submit for notice and comment rulemaking a policy to rescind the final rule entitled “Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual’s Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs” of September 21, 2016, 81 FR 64763, and shall submit for public comment a policy protecting women seeking single-sex rape shelters.

The most wonderful story in five parts! It started here. Just an offhand comment from dear Amy. (If you don’t know Amy’s story, she is a nurse fighting for her job for the past three years bc she knows what a woman is.)

1/ Part two. The reply of the century!

Remember when I said that the sport’s half of Title IX was scrapped. Well, this half wasn’t. Yet. The teacher is right, this is the law. In some places. The Biden Admin demanded this in an executive order on day one.

Thread. So then the Department of Education wrote proposed rule changes to Title IX. The part of that change that was made into law says boys can expose themselves to girls if they claim to be girls. That’s all. Just say the words. And bam! You get flash the girls. 2/

They did it!! We did!! We all did it!!!! We stopped them from taking women’s sports away with Title IX!! Give yourselves a gigantic whopping enormous WOOHOO!!!!!

Thread. The department of education had issued a notice of proposed rule making and tried to make Title IX sports open to anyone who claimed to be a girl. Then they asked for comments.

People sent in 150,000 comments!!!!!! That is huge! 2/

I decided to help this woman out as she seems very confused. No. The Holocaust is not akin to telling men they can’t come in the ladies room.

How is this not like the animus towards a certain group? Well let me show you.

A thread. (Trigger warning.) See the difference?

The evolution of Terving:

Step one. You try to be nice. You say over and over how you respect everyone. You are sure if they understood that women sometimes need their own spaces this would all go away.

1/ Step 2. So you explain. And explain. And explain. And explain. You give examples. Only somehow it is all turned against you. You are accused of weaponizing trauma. Huh? Weaponizing?????

No. You were just expecting a modicum of understanding. You did not find it. 2/

THREAD Reposting Ted Cruz is rare for me but when a man has it this right, you have to give him credit.

Watch as the witness is squirming from answering bc it backs her into a corner. Her ideology prevents her from making this admission. 1/ Notice how she claims that sex and gender are different. But she acts like that is some kind of gotcha as to why men should play in sports.

Lady, YOU have it backwards. We separate sports by sex not by gender. Gender just refers to the social expectations of the sexes. 2/

Thread.

In five days it will be five years since JK Rowling wrong this rather innocuous tweet telling people to live their best life. It changed the course of history.

1/ She was standing up for Maya Forstater who was being forced out of her job for simply stating that men aren’t women. She sued and won a judgement of £ 91,500.

2/

Female inmates are being forced to share a shower with a male convicted of m*rder. He has his franks and beans. He is violent. Will someone please protect these women somehow? @NancyMace please can you help them?

1/ The women inside are in agony and terrified. The authorities say there’s nothing they can do about it unless something “really happens” claims one of the women inmates.

Something really IS happening to them. Being forced to share a shower with a man is a serious harm. 2/

Thread. Dr Johanna Olson-Kennedy tells an audience that it’s understandable that males would want a fake woohoo and says the hard part is that it sterilizes children and she whines that people get “SUPER” worked up about that.

She goes on.

She states a double mastectomy is safe. Safe means free from danger. It is not free from danger. It is major surgery that removes a part of your body. It carries all kinds of risks. It is not “safe”. Nor is it reversible.

Though she later makes the outrageous claim that you can buy some more if you want them back.

2/

Alito is quoting the Cass Report. Says in almost all instances the risks and dangers greatly outweigh the benefits.

“You just relegated the Cass report to a footnote.” Sotomayor is focusing on the fact that some children need this treatment and will suffer without it. Appears to be arguing for heightened scrutiny on this issue.