THREAD.

Re: A male employee in a department store who went up to a young teen in the intimates section and asked her if she needed help.

What people don’t understand about predators or their supporters is how much they think they are victims. That surprised me. 1/ You’ll get a million excuses and always the girl gets blamed. They will pretend they are innocent saints. “He was just being helpful.” “What? What did he do?” “It’s just clothes!” “No one but you would object.”

And the rag€… 2/

Thread

Imagine a man walked up to young teen in a lingerie section to ask if she needed help.

No decent man would do this. Indecent men pretend this is just “being helpful”.

You can tell instantly who is who by their reaction to this situation. 1/ Predators don’t come up to you twirling their mustache. They come up to you smiling. When caught they have plausible deniability. “Who me? I was just being nice! I didn’t do anything! I just offered that little girl some candy bc she looked scared! I was helping her!” 2/

Let me try to explain Mr Tickle’s attorneys’ argument in Giggle App v Tickle.

They say you cannot exclude anyone on the basis of gender identity. Sall says, she doesn’t. She had a female only app.

But they say, if excluding all non females excludes all 1/
men who call themselves some gender identity or another, which is protected, then she loses.

Consequently, it also excludes all men who call themselves c-sgender. That too is a gender identity. Any gender identity is protected they say.

So again. She would lose. 2/

The barrister for Mr Tickle is saying that Sall is not allowed to demonstrate a willful blindness with respect to gender identity.

Please understand where this law stuff is going. They are saying that you MUST believe that men can turn into women.

1/ This is what pronouns take you to. This is what it means when you say that women are a subset of women. The law being argued for is to say that you MUST believe this gender ideology.

That’s what is being fought here. 2/

THREAD

The Giggle v Tickle case shows how vital it is to have words. Words that mean something. We are now at the point where the Se* Discrimination Act doesn’t mean anything bc the word se* means nothing. If words don’t have a meaning then law means nothing. 1/ Today in a court of law an attorney argued that a man is a female because he was wearing a “female top”. What on earth does THAT mean? And he had “female hair”. HUH?? And he had removed hair from his face. (Bc men shave???) 2/

THREAD.

After all this time and people STILL do not get it. Here is some guy thinking there is a compromise. A simple way to “get along”. If only we’d be less obstinate. More forgiving. More understanding. But he has NO clue what is being asked. 1/ He thinks you can compromise. He thinks you can live and let live. He doesn’t understand that his suggestion here would have been equally seen as a h@te incident and he too would have been suspended or reported to the police for suggesting it. 2/

Sandie’s boss wanted to call the police on her for not wanting to get undressed in front of a man who walked into the ladies changing room.

He wanted to call the police on her!!

Jamie Doyle, NHS Fife’s head of nursing for acute services, wrote an email saying this. 1/ I wish I was making this up. I don’t think people have any idea how sadistic some true believers of this ideology have become. They wanted to call the police on her bc she wanted the privacy the law entitles her to. That’s how far this has gone.

2/

Breaking! Thread.

This is HUGE!! During the tribunal, the witness has lapsed into calling Dr Upton “he”. Jane Russell can’t have that and breaks in to remind the witness that we are all playing a game!

This sounds to me like suborning perjury but what do I know. 1/. She claims the witness is getting confused bc Naomi keeps (properly) referring to Dr. Upton as “he”. Then she tries to claim that standards dictate this witness lie. She claims that Naomi is creating a hostile environment!! Talk about projection! 2/

Thread.

After 21 million views, here is a summary of the response to the new “feature” Ani.

The response to Ani is “overwhelmingly negative”. The negative comments come from (surprise) predominantly male users. 1/ The responses to this new character are “overwhelmingly negative”. The backlash stems from concerns about the s*xualized nature of Ani and the undermining of human connections.

2/

Thread

Lesbian Action Group has written a brief on behalf of Sall Grover in the case of Giggle v Tickle.

“it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having six with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept.”

1/ Giggle is an app that @salltweets created for women only. Mr. Tickle demanded access to it & Sall said no. 2/

I Am NEVER Leaving This App.

Dude thinks the word Bear is defamation!!!

😂😂😂😂😂

Let’s try to explain this one.

Thread. It’s starts here. With this conversation. 2/

For three hours today I watched a man go on and on about exactly what criteria it should take to allow men into the ladies room. He’s had surgery so he’s decided that the compromise is to let him into our spaces.

Where do they get the nerve to think they can decide? 1/ Then I watched some women say they were fine with it. One of them I know is a man, but others could be women. Where do they get the nerve to think they can decide to open our spaces to anyone?

2/

Thread.

So, I posted yesterday about Keith Olberman’d weird obsession with Riley Gaines. Then I did a search for some of his comments about her. This is just the most recent stuff. There were so many comments I’d be taking screenshots all day.

1/


Here are some more.

2/

A 🧵 about language.

1. How many times does someone says “including others doesn’t hurt you”? We hear it all day long.

They are wrong. They know it. They don’t want you to know it. 2. Let’s start here. When women are a subset of women they cannot lay claim to anything that was separately a woman’s. In one linguistic sleight of hand, women have lost their individuality that determines who has control of something. Be it sports or prison or their name.

Part 2 on the thread of things people who reject the word woman call women.

This is dehumanizing, belittling, and plain old rude. Can you imagine if your doctor called you the “partner with eggs”?!!

Here are some more: 1/ Bleeders? That’s what we are reduced to?

I am anti any movement that is so anti woman they reduce women to a bodily function.

2/

THREAD.

If you don’t know just how blatantly anti woman this whole gender ideology is, here’s the perfect example. Two articles, same site, same day. Discussing the issue for men they know what a man is. But when it comes to women, we are nothing but owners of body parts. 1/ Here, women have lost their existence altogether. I can’t even repeat this headline it’s so demeaning.

I mean. COME ON. 2/

I Am NEVER Leaving This App conversation of the day!!!

Let’s start here. A bloke tells women that unless they are “producing” eggs they are not women.

(Fyi, women are born with all the eggs they will ever have. They do not produce them. But even if we did this is nutty). 1/ Our hero walks in and tries to enlighten.

Only the British can take trouser press and turn it into a deep cutting blow. 2/

I Am NEVER Leaving This App.

Tonight we have the battle of the athletes. One standing up for women’s sports and the other attacking her for it.

It starts with a surprising tweet from SB defending men and boys in women’s and girls’ sports!!! 1/ I’ll just leave this here. 2/

THREAD.

You won’t believe this!!

Not guilty!!!! The jury found the 55 year old man who exposed himself to women and girls at the Wi Spa not guilty!!

This man who had priors of indecent exposure was found not guilty bc he says some kind of magic words!!!

1/ The case turned on the fact that the spa had let him in. Which they had to do by law.

The Gender Recognition Act, a self id law in California from 2018, gives this man the right to enter women’s private spaces. As soon as it was passed he got his certificate. 2/

THREAD. Currently there is a girl’s softball tournament going on in Minnesota. One team has a male pitcher. How are they doing? Well, they are winning. Bc of course they are. The losing team’s coach told all the girls and their families to hush about being cheated. 1/ The governor, Tim Waltz (that guy who ran with Kamala Harris) and this guy, Will Stancil think it’s wonderful that a boy is pitching and it’s a moral panic to object.

BREAKING. You think the world is upside down? You think women can just go and create separate sports for themselves or choose another business? It is ILLEGAL for a business to provide a place for women to be undressed and not have men there. ILLEGAL.

Thread. 1/

https://twitter.com/katiedaviscourt/status/1928274148381577590

I see the same common mistake made over and over. People say these men wouldn’t go to all this trouble to enter the ladies room.

There is no trouble that they have to go through. No surgery. (95% have their bits and bobs.) They don’t have to wear a dress. 2/