Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖 Profile picture
Baby beginner painter trying something new. Deliberately, thoroughly, and indecently defiant. Take what you like and leave the rest.
14 subscribers
Mar 24 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Remember when people pretended they cared about how this woman was treated? I do. Instead she has been tossed aside and a sainted caste has replaced her. She may not speak truth. She must play pretend even when trying to get a man some help.

The story. 1/ Image This nurse correctly identified a male patient to a doctor over the phone. The doc she was speaking to was a urologist so it mattered that she correctly identify which six her patient was. She called him he and Mr. Which is correct. 2/
Mar 17 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Thread

Remember this headline from a few days ago, well, I think it’s a hospital reacting to legislation they think is ridiculous and imposing. It’s just a guess. But you tell me. 1/ Image Here is the new form the hospital is giving to parents of newborns asking them about their infant’s sexuality and identity about stereotypes. People thought it was fake but apparently the hospital really is doing this. But is the hospital nuts or clever? 2/ Image
Mar 15 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
BREAKING.

Thread.

According to parent testimony at a school board meeting, school administrators tried to force girls to change in front of a boy!! The girls had been complaining that a boy was in their locker room. 1/ Image Per testimony, instead of helping the girls the administrators took the girls to the changing room and told them to change! They said any boy can be in there as long as he “identifies as female”. 2/
Mar 14 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
Thread. In ruling against our dear @preta_6 they wrote this and I’m stunned at the lack of reading comprehension.

Amy wrote about THE trans activists determined to infiltrate women’s spaces. They decided she was saying that something about ALL members of this “community.” 1/ Image First off if you don’t know the story, trans activists went after a women’s r@pe shelter. First the shelter was vandalized and then activists demanded they get defunded bc they dared to be a shelter for women only. The shelter did lose funding. 2/ Image
Mar 13 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
New video!!

Thread
Here’s the owner of the small women only gym being kind and respectful. She is trying so hard to explain why she wants a gym for women. She talks about being assaulted in a gym. She explains her motivation. She is so kind. 1/

She wants everyone to know she isn’t excluding anyone. She has just decided to provide a gym to a specific market segment. Namely women. She wants this gym to do so much for women who need a female only space. 2/
Mar 10 • 11 tweets • 4 min read
OMG. This gets worse and worse. There are 16,000 reposts. I just scanned a tiny sample. And the replies to this woman are not to be believed. You’ve never seen such posts! Here is a thread. And they wonder why she wants a safe space for women only!! 1/ Image Yikes!! Image
Mar 6 • 9 tweets • 5 min read
Once again I have to put this thread together for people who don’t seem to know what the Holocaust was or what the word genocide means. This thread will be tough reading. But it’s needed. So enter at your own risk. You are strenuously warned.

1/
2/ Image
Feb 17 • 10 tweets • 4 min read
Remember that executive order that Trump wrote to protect women’s sports? Well, the NCAA (the biggest college sports assoc there is) wrote a new policy that pretends to comply with the new rules but really doesn’t. They are giving Trump a giant middle finger. Here is how. 1/ Image Oh, it sounds nice. They say that men can’t play on women’s teams. That’s is good. Right? Except…. 2/ Image
Feb 16 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
BREAKING. OMG!

Nurse Sandie Peggie has now been threatened to be fired because she knows a man is a man! The vindictive man in question, Dr. Upton, used the ladies changing room and is throwing a petulant fit bc Sandie dared to want a ladies only ladies changing room. 1/ Image The hospital, who is being sued bc they let a man use the ladies changing room, has now decided to subject the nurse to further disciplinary proceedings! Not the man who walked into the ladies changing room. They are going after HER! 2/
Feb 11 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
If only it was so easy. Dan, and others, think all we need to do is say no and all of these men will leave our private spaces. Except that isn’t what happens.

We say no and they argue with us. They call us names. They threaten us. And then they do what they want. 1/ Image This is a typical response. These men will just walk into our private spaces.

So now what do you suggest we do? In some places they have made it the law that we can’t even argue with them. Any man at all can come into our spaces and we just have to put up with it. 2/ Image
Feb 9 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
When I first got into all of this I, like everyone else, wanted to be kind. I was happy to use whatever language anyone wanted. Sure. Why not?

But then something changed. We call it “peaking”. For me it was a story about a women’s r*p* shelter.

1/ Image I couldn’t quite believe what I was seeing. People were angry at a shelter??? Huh? Then I discovered it was a particular group of men who were furious at the shelter for being for women.

Again. Huh????

2/ Image
Feb 6 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Most people have no idea how bad it was for those women swimmers who had to change all their clothes in front of William “Lia” Thomas and see him waltz around displaying his franks and beans.

They psychologically tormented these girls in order to force this on them.

1/ Image
Image
Most people think that these men have altered their bodies. The overwhelming majority of them have not. (Over 90% still have the bait and tackle.)

I hope those three women who are suing for pain and emotional distress get every penny those Ivy League schools have. 2/ Image
Feb 5 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
BREAKING. Huge lawsuit! Thread.

Three swimmers from Penn are suing the Ivy League and the NCAA for allowing a male (William “Lia” Thomas) to be in their changing room while they were completely nude and then allowing him to compete against them! 1/ Image 2. They seek damages for “pain and suffering, mental and emotional distress, suffering and anxiety, expenses costs and other damages.”

In case you didn’t know, these schools really allowed that man into their changing room and provided the ladies with no other place to change. Image
Jan 26 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
THREAD

OMG!!!

I just got scolded by Gr*k!!!! I got told to use she/her pronouns for a man!!

I swear I got chills as I imagined this being said in the Hal computer voice.

1/ Image 2/. This is just the beginning of the conversion! Image
Jan 23 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
BREAKING thread.

The thing we are told doesn’t happen has happened again. Bc of course it has. We all know what happens when you give these types a way to access women and girls easily. The man said he was a woman and therefore he got in. 1/ Image Notice the carefully worded statement from Arlington Public Schools.

He was let in no problem. It was ONLY when they discovered that he was a registered SO that they kicked him out.

So, if he hadn’t had been convicted before it would have been no problem having him there? 2 Image
Jan 22 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
Another thing this executive order did was rescind gender guidance Biden had pushed through to schools.

Get ready for this list. Most people had no idea his administration had done all of this.

A thread. Image Rescinded:
(i)    “The White House Toolkit on Transgender Equality”;

(ii)   the Department of Education’s guidance documents including:

(A)  “2024 Title IX Regulations: Pointers for Implementation” (July 2024);

(Biden had his education dept rewrite Title IX to include gender identity. Basically, this made it so that schools couldn’t have women only showers or sports or anything. Neither could the boys. This document was an explanation to the schools on all the ways they would have to reorganize to let boys into girls’ spaces and vice versa).
Jan 21 • 15 tweets • 4 min read
I just posted the entire executive order. This will be the TL:Dr version. But it is so good and there is so much that you cannot miss that it will be long too. You must read!

I swear I was tearing up reading this. It’s been so long since anyone spoke the truth. Here we go: Image Section 1.  Purpose.  Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers.

This is wrong.

(YESSSSSSSS!!!)
Jan 21 • 4 tweets • 8 min read
The executive order in its entirety:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers.  

This is wrong.

Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being.  The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system.  

Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself.

This unhealthy road is paved by an ongoing and purposeful attack against the ordinary and longstanding use and understanding of biological and scientific terms, replacing the immutable biological reality of sex with an internal, fluid, and subjective sense of self unmoored from biological facts. 

Invalidating the true and biological category of “woman” improperly transforms laws and policies designed to protect sex-based opportunities into laws and policies that undermine them, replacing longstanding, cherished legal rights and values with an identity-based, inchoate social concept.

Accordingly, my Administration will defend women’s rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male. 

Sec. 2.  Policy and Definitions.  It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female.  These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.  

Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality, and the following definitions shall govern all Executive interpretation of and application of Federal law and administration policy:

(a)  “Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female.  “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”

(b)  “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

(c)  “Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.

(d)  “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

(e)  “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.

(f)  “Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true.

Gender ideology includes the idea that there is a vast spectrum of genders that are disconnected from one’s sex. 

Gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but nevertheless maintains that it is possible for a person to be born in the wrong sexed body.

(g)  “Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.Image Sec. 3.  Recognizing Women Are Biologically Distinct From Men.  

(a)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide to the U.S. Government, external partners, and the public clear guidance expanding on the sex-based definitions set forth in this order.

(b)  Each agency and all Federal employees shall enforce laws governing sex-based rights, protections, opportunities, and accommodations to protect men and women as biologically distinct sexes.  

Each agency should therefore give the terms “sex”, “male”, “female”, “men”, “women”, “boys” and “girls” the meanings set forth in section 2 of this order when interpreting or applying statutes, regulations, or guidance and in all other official agency business, documents, and communications.

(c)  When administering or enforcing sex-based distinctions, every agency and all Federal employees acting in an official capacity on behalf of their agency shall use the term “sex” and not “gender” in all applicable Federal policies and documents.

(d)  The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall implement changes to require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards, accurately reflect the holder’s sex, as defined under section 2 of this order; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall ensure that applicable personnel records accurately report Federal employees’ sex, as defined by section 2 of this order.

(e)  Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages.  

Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. 

Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.

(f)  The prior Administration argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which addressed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, requires gender identity-based access to single-sex spaces under, for example, Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act. 

This position is legally untenable and has harmed women. 

The Attorney General shall therefore immediately issue guidance to agencies to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions in agency activities. 

In addition, the Attorney General shall issue guidance and assist agencies in protecting sex-based distinctions, which are explicitly permitted under Constitutional and statutory precedent.

(g)  Federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology.  Each agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.

Sec. 4.  Privacy in Intimate Spaces. 

(a)  The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers, including through amendment, as necessary, of Part 115.41 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations and interpretation guidance regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act.

(b)  The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall prepare and submit for notice and comment rulemaking a policy to rescind the final rule entitled “Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual’s Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs” of September 21, 2016, 81 FR 64763, and shall submit for public comment a policy protecting women seeking single-sex rape shelters.
Dec 24, 2024 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
The most wonderful story in five parts! It started here. Just an offhand comment from dear Amy. (If you don’t know Amy’s story, she is a nurse fighting for her job for the past three years bc she knows what a woman is.)

1/ Image Part two. The reply of the century! Image
Dec 21, 2024 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Remember when I said that the sport’s half of Title IX was scrapped. Well, this half wasn’t. Yet. The teacher is right, this is the law. In some places. The Biden Admin demanded this in an executive order on day one.

Thread. Image So then the Department of Education wrote proposed rule changes to Title IX. The part of that change that was made into law says boys can expose themselves to girls if they claim to be girls. That’s all. Just say the words. And bam! You get flash the girls. 2/
Dec 21, 2024 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
They did it!! We did!! We all did it!!!! We stopped them from taking women’s sports away with Title IX!! Give yourselves a gigantic whopping enormous WOOHOO!!!!!

Thread. Image The department of education had issued a notice of proposed rule making and tried to make Title IX sports open to anyone who claimed to be a girl. Then they asked for comments.

People sent in 150,000 comments!!!!!! That is huge! 2/ Image