Alessio Patalano Profile picture
Jul 9, 2022 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Aloha - alas for the last time - Twitter: Day 5 #RIMPAC2022. Official press conference, started with condolences to Japan for the tragic loss of former PM Abe. A thread about partners, carriers, unmanned surface combatants, and the brilliant HMAS Canberra.
Partners as a narrative of operational effectiveness. Over the past few days senior commanders, officers, have all constantly pointed out the importance of developing partners interoperability. With 26 nations and more than 25k personnel that is a considerable task.
The press conference reinforced these points and seeing senior and flag officers from different nations with a Philippine and Korean warships in the background helped delivering the point, only somewhat let down by the comments and answers being provided only by USN hosts.
Absent Ukraine, Taiwan in the background. Adm Paparo was masterful in engaging with questions over Taiwan: he has a mission to prepare forces for all contingencies, and whilst vocabulary was measured and well chosen, the message was clear.
Compared to 2018 this feels different.
Three points struck me throughout the day:
A. Respect for sovereignty was a recurrent reference;
B. HADR, amphib and warfighting were the main operational sign posts;
C. Integration of multinational C2 was a major shared objective.
Main downside: no cookies today. Not one.
Unmanned future? Not so fast. This is one of the real new novelty at this year’s RIMPAC. Testing the integration of manned/unmanned capabilities - with the first dedicated squadron collecting data to understand what kind of teaming is the way forwards.
Very modular assets.
USS Lincoln (CVN-72). Going on a carrier is always a special experience. It’s a statement of power, modernity, international standing, and of the complexity of modern societies. The CO - first female carrier CO - was genuinely engaging, and had one line which I very much enjoyed:
The next generation is far more resilient that usually credited for. She spoke at length of the deployment which has seen a number of challenges in testing new capabilities - not least F-35s.
The flight deck was packed with all sort of helos, fighters, EW platforms…
Nothing really equals an American carrier. Plus the artwork on the helos was just witty.

That said. Nothing is as charming as a large amphib ship with a kangaroo on the funnel. HMAS Canberra is a fine platform. The air control tower in particular was incredibly well designed.
In this respect, please note it’s position next to the bridge - very different to other rotary wing operating platforms, and the sky jump which doesn’t come with a coating for fixed wing ops.
And so my time at RIMPAC has come to an end. I have notes from meetings, interviews, and the additional activities that helped me understand this incredibly large military experience.
More will come out of this, but for now, I’ll just focus on getting ready to fly back. Thanks!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alessio Patalano

Alessio Patalano Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alessionaval

Nov 16
War games expose aircraft carriers as the Royal Navy’s weak link - really? What a shocker. Alternative title: war at sea is a attritional. Alternative title: war games discover that a good naval history book wd have been a much more revealing exercise. 🤨 thetimes.com/uk/defence/art…
Let me briefly explain why the article is unhelpful and wide off the mark. I shall proceed by focusing on three aspects: assumptions about war at sea; correlation of operational activity and effects; and last but by no means least, CSG vulnerabilities. Let’s take them in turn:
A. Assumptions. Naval warfare is attritional. It’s about salvoes and rewards actions aimed at anticipating your opponent, find their fleet, and remove it from the equations. War games haven’t discovered that. And Admirals like good old Lord Nelson or Togo made an art of it;
Read 19 tweets
Jul 5
Good morning X. With elections results in the UK coming in there will be rivers of commentary on what it all means looking ahead. A couple of ‘hot takes’ based on an observation of relevant statements and writing insofar as the wider Indo-Pacific is concerned. A short thread:
A. Expect change. It is somewhat obvious by Labour manifesto literally was run on the notion of ‘change’. For the IP what does that mean?
1. Change of vocabulary. The ‘tilt’ apt as it was to set right tone of expectations is likely to disappear together with global Britain lingo;
In some respects though this was already happening - see IRR23 (UK had tilted) - and also a good thing. The UK is now part of regional furnitures. A stable and sustainable engagement is what’s needed. Change of vocabulary would be great if it could strike that balance;
Read 16 tweets
Jun 23
There’s something incredibly important in this tweet, one that makes a warship stand out as a fundamentally different military capability: it’s more than a combat platform. It is a reproduction in scale of a society and the values and social practices it is defined by.
It is home and office. Restaurant and house kitchen. It is sports centre and ‘me’ space. A menu captures so many of these attributes. It also introduces us to what French scholar Foucault called the ultimate ‘heterotopia’: a constructed place in which ‘home’ is a combo of places;
Captain’s @ChowdahHill posts have been the most inspiring expression of this adding new meaning to the role social media have in adding to the above: a warship on X becomes a means for the heterotopia of a ship to be transformed into the town hall of the village that is its crew;
Read 6 tweets
Jan 13
Again - important piece of info confirming that both UK AND US struck targets on the basis of legal notion of self-defence, which in turn explains why the last para in this note makes clear this was not part of the Prosperity Guardian operation. A couple of thoughts on this:
1. Proportionality. Emphasis on a legal basis for self-defence creates a clear ‘space’ in terms of depth and length of military action. Action is proportional to the type of challenge and threat to military assets in the Red Sea region;
2. Collective action. By operating on the basis of self-defence, and therefore separating military action to strike targets from the escorts and patrol of Red Sea of Prosperity Guardian, the US and UK are preserving the integrating of the Prosperity Guardian operation itself;
Read 7 tweets
Dec 10, 2023
Good evening. The pas few weeks have been quite eventful from a naval perspective. Several theatres have seen different types of action - all providing evidence of the declination of sea power in the contemporary world, and of how contested order at sea stands. A thread: Image
I know. Cheeky to start off with an AI generated image. Rather misleading too because this thread is not about the US Navy -yet, it is important to stress that the irony of today’s contested seas is 25 years of assumed dominance leading to a critical lack of sustained investment.
The crisis of success. In 2007, my colleague and mentor Geoff Till captured what was a crucial trend. Navies belonging to the club of US-allies and partners had largely moved in a ‘postmodern’ reality in which exploitation of control was the key concern. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 17 tweets
Nov 12, 2023
A Chinese dispute with the Philippines is a test of America - a fine piece citing ⁦@IBKardon superb book. With revealing quotes from known PRC military analysts.⁩ economist.com/china/2023/11/…
economist.com/china/2023/11/…
There is also in the quotes a golden quotes:
“I consider a collision almost inevitable, given the high frequency of encounters,” says Mr Zhou. But if Chinese pilots stayed farther away, that would amount to “escorting America as it harms China’s interests”. Zhuo Buo.
In this passage he refers to air intercepts in SCS. He is generally on the provocative side of opinions, but here you have a textbook example of attempts at normalising the idea of a collision as an acceptable outcome of an American fault. A plausible narrative needing challenge;
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(