Justin Alexander Profile picture
Jul 9, 2022 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The eighth installment of the #Dragonlance series expands the scope of the Saga once again by fully incorporating BATTLESYSTEM - the fantasy wargame designed to integrate mass combat into your roleplaying game. ImageImage
This marks a significant shift in the Saga: Whereas in Volume I, the PCs were constantly forced to flee before the dragon armies, now the expectation seems to be that they will actually be leading troops into the maw of war.
We're continuing our Let's Read of the #Dragonlance Saga!

If you want to begin from the beginning, start over here!

DL8 Dragons of War, by Tracy and Laura Hickman, can be roughly broken down into three parts:

1. The journey from Ergoth to Sancrist, eventually reaching the Tower of the High Clerist which is currently besieged. Image
2. A dungeon delve into the sealed upper reaches of the Tower in order to retrieve artifact(s) that may help save the day. Image
3. The battle!

Either the forces of good win their first significant victory against the dragonarmies, or Sancrist falls and "there is little hope left for all of Ansalon." Image
Throughout the three phases of the adventure, there is also supposed to be a significant political component.

This promises to be REALLY COOL... and then it mostly isn't.
The primary problem seems to be the Event/Encounter format of the DL series.

We've discussed this before, tl;dr: Events are keyed to go off at specific times. Encounters are keyed to specific locations.
The DL series is almost entirely jammed into this format. So basically everything is either an Event or an Encounter.

And the problem is that big political drama just doesn't fit the format.
The logical thing, of course, would be to toss the format and use one that's more appropriate. But the designers are, instead, trapped by it.

Let's take a closer look.
First, upon arriving in Sancrist, the PCs can/will attend the Council of Whitestone, where elves, dwarves, kender, and humans meet to discuss a joint defense against the dragonarmies. Image
The PCs get a seat at the table because...

Well, actually, it's unclear why. I would guess it's either because they have the Orb/Dragonlance and/or because they're the only reps from Abanasynia/Thorbardin.
But the entire Council is summarily dispatched with in a single block of boxed text.

So it's a complete dud, culminating in the Council trying to take the Orb and Dragonlance from the PCs. As you watch, delegates fro...
Even if the PCs' inclination would be, "Sure! If it would help, let's do it!" the adventure makes sure to have an NPC helpfully tell them that they're supposed to run away and keep the Orb/Dragonlance for themselves.
This also, bizarrely, creates a continuity meltdown, because despite the adventure going out of its way to make sure the PCs hold onto the orb and dragonlance...
...the rest of the Saga assumes the gnomish Weaponsmith Guild inspects the dragonlances, reverse engineers them, and starts making new ones.

So dragonlances start popping up all over the place from here on out. Image
But what I really weep for here is the missed opportunity of the Council.

It's such a cool moment when a D&D campaign "tiers up" and the PCs start rubbing shoulders with the powerful; their adventures carrying them deep into the circles where big, meaningful decisions are made.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Alexander

Justin Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hexcrawl

Jan 22
This article was removed because it was attracting transphobes and its original purpose was also defunct.

Core claims from the article and the discussion at the time it was written:

1. You shouldn't deadname people.
2. However, the ethics of re-editing material written before a name change is complicated.

3. If Jennell requested a change to the original article, I would change it.

(She did, and I did.)
For better or for worse, I stand by those claims.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 22
I have been asked to respond to this post.

Short version: The post is not only lying about what I said, it's also wrong about what Jennell said and what Jennell's wife has said.

diyanddragons.blogspot.com/2024/01/xander…
For one example completely out of my control, the post claims Jennell's wife said she was in a coma on November 1st in the GoFundMe updates.

You can go look: That's not true.

(Make a donation while you're there.)

gofundme.com/f/jennell-jaqu…
The post is, IMO, deceptive in countless ways, for example by claiming that my descriptions of private messaging in the spring of 2023 is actually describing a public comment on a deleted blog post from 2018.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
When I did theater, we would periodically run into "my significant other is uncomfortable with my character (me) kissing someone onstage."

Never once had someone's significant other get concerned about their significant other getting stabbed or haunted by a ghost on stage.
Remove the script and the formality of the stage and... well...
I'm not even saying "it's because people will get concerned." I'm saying human emotion is complicated and personal comfort with emotion, particularly in Puritanical America, is varied.
Read 16 tweets
Jun 19, 2023
Re: 5E DMG. #dnd

A lot is made of chapter order (start by creating a pantheon of gods!). That's easy to point to, but is really only representative of the more fundamental problem:

The designers didn't have a clear vision for the structure of play. Cover of 5E Dungeon Master'...
So there's a bunch of stuff, but very little of it is actually connected to any clear function. It seems mostly sourced from other D&D books and a vague sense that this is "cool" or "should be there."

Which makes it tough for the reader to come to grips with it.
It's like a hoarder's garage. If you dig through it, you're occasionally like, "Holy crap! There's a 3D printer in here!"

The print head is missing and you'll need to track down some filament before you can use it, but... 3D printer! Wow!
Read 6 tweets
Jan 20, 2023
OGL 1.2 survey is live.

survey.alchemer.com/s3/7182208/OGL…  1. Would you like to provide feedback on the content of the
Well... a lot, actually. 2. Now that you've read the proposed OGL 1.2, what concerns
But here's my tight response:

Attempting to de-authorize the OGL is simply unacceptable. I will not purchase anything from Hasbro if you persist in this extra-legal act of cultural vandalism.
Read 29 tweets
Jan 20, 2023
Let's sneak peek the survey.

survey.alchemer.com/s3/7182208/OGL… Image
Yes, please. 1. Would you like to provid...
And it immediately broke.

Very cool. You have already submitted ...
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(