Seth Abramson Profile picture
Jul 11, 2022 21 tweets 4 min read Read on X
(🔐) NEW: Trump Addressed Extremists Via Zoom 96 Hours Before the Capitol Attack—Some of Whom Thereafter Trespassed on Capitol Grounds

This is by far the largest and most complex report ever published at PROOF. I hope you’ll subscribe, read, and RETWEET. sethabramson.substack.com/p/new-trump-ad…
1/ I am not really sure what to do, here, thread-wise. This is a novella-length work that probably takes a few hours to read and covers so many topics that there are individual parentheticals in the text that I think entire investigative reports could be written about. Seriously.
2/ There’s no summarizing this report—at least not accurately. But I’ll say (and no one who reads this will disagree, I promise) that it covers, as *one* of its topics, what is unquestionably the greatest and most immediate threat to the United States today. And I can prove it.
3/ One of the people discussed in this novella is my former law school constitutional law professor—Ronald Reagan’s former Solicitor General. The man who gave me the lowest grade of my entire law school career. There’s not a single thing this very smart man and I ever agreed on.
4/ 72 hours ago, this man, who I haven’t spoken to for 25 years—and with whom I agree on nothing—called what I’ve just termed the greatest threat to our democracy a “slow-moving coup d’état” that’s likely to end our democracy in 2023. It is the first thing we have ever agreed on.
5/ Lest you think I’m somehow being coy here—trying to avoid revealing what this new PROOF article is about—I think you’ll now see how this anecdote ties into the best summary I can possibly offer of what this report covers. First, it’s *partly* about ISL. brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
6/ But as all of you know, PROOF primarily covers January 6—a major event from 2021—*not* events that are coming in 2023. So how am I writing about the greatest threat to democracy but *also* writing about an event that happened more than a year and a half ago?

Well, here’s how.
7/ America is over starting in Summer 2023. The Supreme Court will rule 5-4 for the North Carolina General Assembly in a case that makes voting purposeless—as state legislatures gerrymandered to within an inch of their lives can choose the next POTUS in 2024. Which will be Trump.
8/ But what no one realizes is that Donald Trump and his lawyers wanted what we now know as Moore v. Harper (the 2023 case I mentioned, to be argued in December 2022) to be a different case entirely—one they brought in January 2021.

And they were *so close* to getting their way.
9/ They were close in part because they had the votes. And they *knew* they did. Let me repeat: ISL could have given Trump the White House in 2021; all five (some would say six) of the coup teams he had operating pre-January 6 knew it; and they were *right*. They *had the votes*.
10/ The only thing they didn’t have is time. It’s hard to get something scheduled to happen in mid-2023 to actually happen in early 2021—even if you have the votes. On the other hand, you can’t possibly imagine what Ginni and Clarence Thomas were willing to do to reinstall Trump.
11/ Roberts won’t vote for ISL. This is known. (Despite his hatred of voting rights.) So the vote now is 5-4; the votes are locked in from past public statements. Which means that if Clarence Thomas isn’t impeached for being an insurrectionist before next summer, America is over.
12/ Am I being clear enough? I hope so.
13/ The apex of the post-election/pre-insurrection plot to use ISL to reinstall Trump as president came on January 2, 2021, during a national conference call Trump held with hundreds and hundreds of insurrectionists. PROOF is one of the few media outlets to ever report this call.
14/ But Trump had the votes in SCOTUS on January 2. So why did he need a call allegedly only for GOP state legislators? He had already created seven slates of fake electors which if (as Bannon predicted) SCOTUS “sent the election back to the states,” those legislators would pick.
15/ You will recall that I said that the one thing Trump was missing was *time*. And the only way he could get that time was for the Capitol to be overrun and occupied. Which is why he lied about who was on that January 2 call. Many more people than just legislators were on it.
16/ The number of Trumpworld figures who appear in this report is almost beyond counting. Trump. Don Jr. Bannon. Alexander. Stone. Jones. Raffensperger. Finchem. D’Souza. Eastman. Giuliani. The Thomases. Roberts. Gorsuch. Navarro. The Kremers. Many others. It is a sweeping story.
17/ And then there’s what *isn’t* here, but what this report directly informs. If you never fully understood why the “Georgia Letter” that Klukowski and Eastman and Clark schemed up getting the DOJ to send out on January 3 *matters*, this PROOF report answers that for you. Fully.
18/ In short, Trump spent the 120 hours before the attack on the Capitol trying to ensure that as many *radicals*—not just legislators—as possible understood that he had a real chance to remain President of the United States if he just had enough time to get to the Supreme Court.
19/ Did you ever wonder why the primary Trump January 6 war room was filled with lawyers? Why it was *lawyers* calling the Capitol in mid-attack demanding more delays, why it a *lawyer* (Eastman) shrugged when the White House Counsel’s Office warned him he was fomenting violence?
20/ Trump’s lawyers were willing to do/cause anything they had to to buy themselves the time they felt they needed to get to *Clarence Thomas*.

That’s why nearly all of them are now on the road to being disbarred and/or have pleaded the Fifth Amendment under federal questioning.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Apr 11
This was a potential outcome discussed at length in my pinned report.

The Court demands signs of effort but not a result—a win for the Trump administration, as it appears to confirm its theory that Bukele has control over anyone on his soil.

This is bad. cnn.com/2025/04/10/pol…
Do be careful in reading analysis of this case. Casual observers who aren't familiar with it will tell you this was a win for Garcia—and it certainly will be if Trump and his pal in El Salvador decide to save his life. But as a matter of the law going forward, this is a disaster.
The legal question was whether a human body comes under the control of a foreign dictator the moment that body is put on a plane to that country and the plane leaves the ground.

The implication of this decision is that the answer is yes. Which means the disappearances can start.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 4
OMG... it was all AI.

They didn't even care enough about the American economy to do any of the work themselves.

It almost feels... impeachable?

How could sloppily using AI to create domestic policy, then hiding it, be consistent with the Oath of Office? theverge.com/news/642620/tr…
This explains everything. The bad tariff math, placing tariffs on uninhabited islands, the odd errors that keep popping up in administration texts, the fact that Musk has said he wants to replace the humans in our government with AI, the fact that he *runs an AI company*.... JFC!
So much makes sense now. The website deletions that seem based on the most imbecilic reading of search results, the bizarrely high number of EOs, the obsession with the idea that people don't matter because AI can do everything in government... few if any humans are at the wheel!
Read 4 tweets
Apr 2
Musk is now a bigger fount for toxic, self-aggrandizing bullshit than P.T. Barnum ever was.

He’s an utter 🤡—and that’s both a historical and provable fact. There’s nothing non-journalistic about observing when a man has become infamous for his rank nonsense and foolish gambits. Image
But that’s only the start of the story.

PROOF has outlined—with full sourcing—how Musk for years avoided politics on the advice of his father, and for years avoided revealing his far-right ideologies for fear they would destroy his business empire.

He was right. It’s happening.
In other words, he *knew* his far-right ideologies would be grotesque to consumers.

He *knew* that if he entered politics in America, those ideologies would cause him to become an instant target for hate from a majority of patriotic Americans—who unlike him believe in democracy.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 30
(🧵) A GROK THREAD on ELON MUSK AND MENTAL HEALTH.

This thread is limited to information provided by Elon Musk’s own commercial products.

Please RETWEET. Image
2/ Image
3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 29
Musk has been told—repeatedly—that this is a lie. The global population is rising and will continue to rise until 2100, then it’ll decline slightly. Many countries, JUST NOT MAJORITY WHITE ONES, have over-replacement birth rates. Musk focuses on a small number of white nations.
So no, there are NO experts in this field who agree humanity is dying. There are NO experts who have a longterm underpopulation concern. There are NO experts who agree with Musk. The ONLY people concerned are white supremacists who worry white nations may become SLIGHTLY smaller.
But his lie is worse than this. He KNOWS and has been TOLD that rich, developed, often—but certainly not exclusively—majority-white nations see a birth rate decline BECAUSE of their wealth. That’s normal. It does not mean those nations will collapse, just reduce slightly in size.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 29
(🧵1/3) Time to clear some things up.

1. Elon Musk has many biographers; none are “official.”
2. I’m a Musk biographer; I don’t use Musk as a source because he’s a known pathological liar.
3. My second Musk biography (first is below) arrives in 2026.

🔗: sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-of-des…Image
Image
(🧵2/3)

4. Grok is aware I’m a Musk biographer, as is the world (see my bio excerpt below, from my website). But Grok, by Musk’s design, sometimes struggles to access Substack—which confuses it about my status.
5. I’m a multiple-time NYT-bestselling biographer of public figures. Image
(🧵3/3)

6. Elongelicals have a favorite Musk biographer—Isaacson—as Walt tells them what they want to hear. He just repeats what Elon says and is himself a fanboy. My methodology is different: I’m a curatorial journalist.
7. You want fan-fiction? Go with Walt. For the truth, me.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(