Suth Korea's plans to decapitate the North Korean leadership in a crisis is the most plausible route to a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula. Officials should stop making these threats so I can stop making these threads. 🧵
For years, South Korean officials have suggested the ROK Army Missile Command can kill Kim Jong Un and other DPRK leaders before they can issue an order for the KPA to use nuclear weapons. This is called "decapitation."
38north.org/2013/02/jlewis…
This is the *military* plan that is most likely to succeed. I understand why the JCS recommends it as the best of some bad options. But it is also the option most likely to create uncontrollable escalation dynamics and start a nuclear war. Politicians should say "no thank you."
There are really two problems with this strategy. First, North Korea's plan is also the best of some bad options: Use nuclear weapons first to repel an invasion. The problem is, both of them plan to go first. But they can't both be right.
This is the literally the prisoner's dilemma, as well as the canonical statement of the problem in Schelling's Reciprocal Fear of Surprise Attack. No one wants to start a nuclear war, but you are so much better off going first than second.
rand.org/content/dam/ra…
Everything depends on going first. So both side will look for signals war is imminent to get the jump on the adversary. In a crisis, one or the other might think the other is about to attack when it isn't. I wrote a whole novel about it. #2020Commission.
amazon.com/Commission-Rep…
Now, there is a second problem -- although it's mostly a theoretical concern at the moment. North Korea is now deploying tactical nuclear weapons to frontline artillery units, not just the KPA Strategic Rocket Force.
What kind of "command and control" measures will North Korean adopt? When will units receive nuclear weapons? During peacetime or only in crisis? When are units authorized to use nuclear weapons? What security measures govern when they are able to use nuclear weapons?
A natural response to fear of decapitation or a surprise attack is to give frontline units access to nuclear weapons and to pre-delegate the authorization to use these nuclear weapons. That's what the US did in Europe in the 1950s.
nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4… Excerpt from "Instructions for the Expenditure of Nucle
Providing nuclear weapons to frontline units raises all kinds of questions about accidental or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons. Accidents happen. Humans make mistakes.
upi.com/Archives/1985/…
Would Kim Jong Un use nuclear weapons in response to a mistaken belief South Korea was planning to kill him? Would that fear drive him to empower frontline commanders to use nuclear weapons if he were killed? Is there risk of an accidental or unauthorized use by frontline units?
The answer to all these is either "I don't know" or "Probably not." But that raises another question: Would you bet your life on it? Would you bet the lives of all ~50 million people on the Korean Peninsula, and some considerable number of people in the United States, on it?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArmsControlWonk

Jul 12
The US has a "launch-under-attack" posture, not launch-on-warning. We all pretend there is a difference in meetings. There isn't. It's just gate-keeping. A short thread on what happens if you use "LOW" in a meeting.
How does the US define a "launch under attack" posture?

"Execution by the President of Single Integrated Operational Plan forces subsequent to tactical warning of strategic nuclear attack against the United States and prior to first impact."
bits.de/NRANEU/others/… Excerpt from the Department...
Yes, that's correct: The US does not have a launch-on-warning posture, it has a "launch under attack" posture defined as launch "on tactical warning." Completely different postures. 😉
Read 7 tweets
Jul 11
New York City has a new PSA on what to do if the city is struck by a nuclear weapon. The advice isn't wrong, it's just ... unhelpful.
The big problem with the video is that it omits some pretty important context: If Russia, China or North Korea hit NYC with a 300 kt warhead, this advice won't help many people in the city itself. It's more useful to people in communities downwind.
nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?&kt=3… Image
Even then "stay inside" doesn't go very far: Are you even at home? If not, will others let you inside? What about children at school? Do they try to get home? What if your building collapsed? What if you were injured in the blast and need medical care? What about food? Water?
Read 7 tweets
Jun 29
Iran released video of the suborbital test launch of its Zoljanah space launch vehicle. @madwonk and I used the video to estimate the thrust of the solid-propellant rocket motor. A short thread.
en.irna.ir/news/84802669/…
This is Iran's second launch of the Zoljanah SLV. Last time, the video did not permit us to make a confident observation about the performance of the engine. This time the video was much, much better!
The basic idea is to measure the acceleration of the rocket to estimate the thrust of its motor. We stole this idea shamelessly from @rjallain. (If you take my "New Tools" course at @miis, you'll spend a week tracking the acceleration of rockets.)
wired.com/2016/01/how-fa…
Read 10 tweets
Jun 28
The DPRK meeting of the Central Military Commission gives us a chance to update our list of who's who. These are my notes on who was present. Other people (@Michael_NKLW, @jeongminnkim, etc.) do DPRK-leadership watching much better than I do, so corrections welcome.
There is a vote on Ri Pyong Chol's promotion to Vice Chair where we can see 11 hands go up. I am going to say that means 12 members of the CMC. (11, plus Ri who apparently recused himself.)
My list, not in order:
Kim Jong Un, 김정은
Pak Jong Chon, 박정천
Ri Pyong Chol, 리병철
Jo Yong Won, 조용원
O Su Yong, 오수용
Ri Yong Gil, 리영길
O Il Jong, 오일정
Kim Jo Guk, 김조국
Kang Sun Nam, 강순남
Jong Kyong Thaek, 정경택
Jo Kyong Chol, 조경철
Ri Chang Ho, 리창호
Read 5 tweets
Jun 23
North Korea is probably moving toward deploying tactical nuclear weapons to frontline artillery units. 🧵
Kim Jong Un just presided over a meeting of the Central Military Commission that made a decision "adopting important military measures to enhance the operational capabilities of the frontline units."
kcna.kp/en/article/q/1… Image
The North Korean statement today doesn't specify what those measures are, but it echoes what North Korea said on April 16 when it test-launched a short-range ballistic missile for nuclear missions. The two statements together probably tell the whole story.
kcna.kp/en/article/q/e…
Read 15 tweets
Apr 3
A funny thing happened today. We've been taking a second look at North Korea's Hwasong-15 ICBM -- particularly how large it is. I had a clever thought! What if I estimated the diameter using the diagrams in official US documents?
I dropped a grid on top of the missile line-ups in 2020 NASIC Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat and the 2019 Missile Defense Review. I was able to use the Russian missiles as a reference from START data for scale.
As an aside, the little person presented for scale seems to be 5'6" (170 cm) tall. Maybe DOD has a thing for short kings, but I bet they just slapped in icon and set the *whole* embedded image to 180 cm. I have now thought more about these charts than the people who made them.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(