In football terms, Zambia's recent reclassification from lower middle to low income country is like being relegated to a lower league from the premier. It's less competitive there, but not exciting & no growth. There's nothing to celebrate, we just went back to handouts. #Zambia
To many who follow these things though, the reclassification isn't a surprise going by sustained weakening of our macroeconomic policies in recent years, thanks to unsustainable debt levels, the energy crisis of 2015 & eventually COVID-19 recently as some of the reasons. #Zambia
Lower middle income status is good for many reasons: e.g higher average per capita income imply more DOMESTIC resources available for poverty reduction. Also means access to private capital markets: that's how we got Eurobonds, unfortunately not well spent.#Zambia
Low income status is bad, for related reasons: low average per capita incomes mean no domestic resources for poverty reduction... you depend on donors🥺. No access to capital markets, so no money to fund ambitious projects needed to spur growth e.t.c #Zambia
Suffice to say we wasted our lower middle income status. Instead of using it to access capital and invest in projects that could grow the economy, we invested in some projects that cannot even help us recover what we spent.
What I'm simply saying is, no one is ready to give us a Eurobond now because the low income status means we've no capacity to honor commercial debt obligations. So, we're back to relying on donor aid whose spending is dictated by the giver. #Zambia
You're not following. What I'm saying is, it is now hard for anyone to lend us money to construct a new airport like we did with KKIA and Ndola new airport. This infrastructure is key for growth. #Zambia
Lastly, we are back to survival mode. When we got Euro bonds, we were telling the world we are now ready to do what we want, we have the resources. And yes we got the money, did what we wanted, but may be did it badly.
A summary of the Finance Minister's State of the Economy address for your reading pleasure. #HappyFriday
Firstly, let's understand that we live in an intertwined global spider web which exposes us to colds and flus whenever a significant member of the global community sneezes.
Thus, we're not spared from the effects of the Russia-Ukraine crisis for example, particularly, the disruption in oil supplies which has pushed global oil prices up
Regarding life partner decisions, I'm reminded of a story shared by the erudite historian @ssishuwa during our UNZA days before he became a political commentator . He's likely forgotten.
While in Chiengi trying to cross Lake Mweru, locals informed him that the usual speed boat used to cross the lake had broken down and convinced him to instead pay a fare to cross by canoe, which he reluctantly accepted.
About 100 meters into the water trip, with the canoe struggling to paddle, the speed boat showed up to his surprise. He admired the speed boat, but he had already paid the fare. To jump into the new boat or stay in the canoe is the question that stretched his mind.
The wedding will be nice, people will dance and eat your food then go home leaving the 2 of you. If you borrowed to do the the wedding the debt is for you 2 to face. I hope you didn't because it is a bad way to start.
The few months after the wedding are really the best. Full of romance, spending time & attending functions together and all. Sometimes you don't even want to leave the house or even go for work. This is the stage where you even ask each other "WHY DID WE WAIT THIS LONG?
Men, you should help build your partner’s financial security. Your woman’s financial security empowers her to make independent decisions, including against you. She can move out if she wants w/o worrying about survival. It’s a good thing or else she becomes your economic slave.
Being socially secure in my opinion is ability to enjoy own company w/o relying on your spouse. You’re still happy in their absence. Them being away doesn’t destabilize your emotions. You respect each other’s space. You’re not clingy.
Being mentally secure in my opinion is ability to make own decisions w/o relying on your spouse. He/she can give you advice, but you’re not entirely dependent on it. You don’t have a mental breakdown when criticized or during disagreements.
I think the first marital problems for many young couples start with our failure to reconcile some of the unrealistic expectations we had about marriage in general & our partners in particular with the realities that follow post wedding. The new discoveries can lead to breakups
But the biggest problem starts with our society which expected men and women to marry at a certain age. Those unmarried, especially women experience some level of stigma from family & friends. In short no one is expected to opt out of getting married. I don’t think this is right.
Consequently, nearly every young woman has ‘getting married’ as part of their life goals to be attained. Not only that, but girls are also told to expect that they will find a man who will:
love them
protect them
care for them
provide for them
lead them
etc.
We live in a society that insists men must be leaders, including in marriages. And this doesn't put into account the caliber of some men to shoulder the responsibilities of leadership at family or societal level. What a privilege we've as men! Qualified w/out a test.
As a man myself there are times I've thought perhaps some expectations are too much. For instance, I'm expected to not fear snakes jut because I'm a man. I actually fear snakes... but I must man up and face one if it comes in the house and I'm the only man around. This is bad
And then I have seen foolish men who marry or are found in the company of wiser women. They must lead because society said so. Oh what a struggle it is to want to appear wise when you're a fool just because you're a man! Can't we allow those who can lead do so despite the gender?