A recent archeological/twitterological dig uncovered a historical artifact from the Carter years (1977 - 1981) titled "Equitable Treatment by United States of Its Citizens Living Abroad" - a curious thing from a curious time. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22…
The first law was Public Law 95 - 426 which became law on October 7, 1978. Sec. 611(a) and 611(b) of the "Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1979" created a law which acknowledged the existence and value of #Americansabroad. Specifically the mandated ...
The second law was Public Law 96-60 which became law on August 15, 1979. SEC. 407 of that law amended "Subsection (a)(2) of section 611 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1979" as follows ... govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ST…
The third law was Public Law 97 - 241 which became law on August 24, 1982. Sec. 505 repealed "obsolete provisions" of other laws. By 1982 the notion of "equitable treatment" of #Americansabroad was now obsolete and was therefore repealed. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ST…
To be clear the 1978 law was repealed on August 24, 1982. So, this law no longer exists. I found one judicial reference to the law in a 1983 decision which is worth the read. It suggests the law was intended to be aspirational. scholar.google.ca/scholar_case?c…
Here is a 2013 post which includes (1) a detailed summary of the law and (2) references to how the Carter administration considered the treatment of #Americansabroad. You will find references to familiar faces who are still involved in this struggle. renounceuscitizenship.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/pre…
Sec. 611(b) of the 1978 law required that the President do a study and make a report on laws impacting #Americansabroad. The report was apparently done prior to the 1979 amendments. The report (linked here) is a "Treasure Trove" of analysis. babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pur1…
The report includes an extensive discussion of taxation. I would like to point out that in 1978 #Americansabroad had no problems with: #PFIC, #CFC, #ForeignTrusts, #FBAR, #FATCA, etc. The report was not based on the facts (or #FATCAoids) as they are today.
A detailed report - will take time to digest. But, there is a suggestion that @citizenshiptax was retained largely because of the fantasy/myth that America provides protection to #Americansabroad. NO! 1. taxation without vaccination and 2. per @Intlowl
Once upon a time, well in the last century, America had a President who believed that #Americansabroad had value. That sentiment became "obsolete" in the 1982 law. But, the 1978 law should be resurrected as an interpretive aid for the interpretation of all laws and regulations.
Somehow at least the title to this song comes to mind ...
After more research I have discovered that the Sec. 611 of the 1978 "Foreign Relations Authorization Act" originated from Senator McGovern. According to the report the Carter administration was hostile to #Americansabroad See for example page 102 here babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pur1…
I hadn't realized that ACA ("American Citizens Abroad") was actually formed (in Geneva Switzerland) for the purpose of educating the Carter administration (and Congress) on the problems experienced by #Americansabroad (tax, citizenship, voting. social security, medicare, etc.)
In 1976 the USA (evidence of its love for #Americansabroad) had BOTH: 1. Repealed the FEIE and 2. Required that housing provided for #Americansabroad be taxed at the rental market value and not at the cost to the employer. Result: Huge increase in US taxes and crisis for #expats.
The following post describes a law review article which discusses the repeal of the FEIE in 1976 and the resurrection of the FEIE in 1978. At least the USA realized it had made a huge mistake. citizenshipsolutions.ca/2020/05/12/the…
The Carter years were years of crisis for #Americansabroad. The original ACA did a very good job of organizing and (reading through the lines) appear to have been a major factor in causing Senator McGovern to sponsor 1978 law that resulted in the report. babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pur1…
In fact ACA organized an index of 50 categories of issues that negatively impacted the lives of #Americansabroad. You will recognize many of the same issues today.
no reference to the #FATCA that via the @citizenshiptax regime the USA is actually imposing worldwide tax on individual who live in and have @taxresidency in other countries and this is a direct attack on the tax base and sovereignty of other countries. Problem described as ...
the US @citizenshiptax regime makes US citizens more expensive to employ (hence the rationale for the FEIE). The issue of "fairness" is not introduced as the primary problem (same as today). Interestingly, ACA seemed more concerned with making #CBT work better and ending #CBT.
Responding to answers from Carter admin, ACA fought back. Pg 78 - Issue 27 - ACA provides a good analysis of the harm inflicted (at that time) by the US @citizenshiptax regime. You should read it! At the end they suggest the possibility of severing citizenship from @taxresidency.
This valuable historical record reinforces that US @citizenshiptax cannot be fixed and that all efforts must be focussed on severing citizenship from @taxresidency. "Carveouts" are as unworkable today as they were in 1978 and will always be.
@citizenshiptax has turned the USA into a "fiscal prison" and taxation is the warden. The @Ewarren proposed wealth tax specifically relies on
@citizenshiptaxto ensure no escape. Again, the report is here ... babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pur1…
Some additional thoughts based on a 1980 NY Times article ...
Interesting and motivating ... Frequent references to the fact that the fight to repeal WEP and GPO has been going in since 1983 (40 years). Adovacy is difficult!
Principle 7 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
It's critical to understand how US @citizenshiptax makes it harder and more expensive for U.S. companies to hire U.S. citizen employee/managers/executives. Nobody understands this better than Jim Gosart - @jgoshksk ...
Principle 6 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
The biggest obstacle to change to the US @citizenshiptax extra-territorial tax regime is NOT Congress or Treasury
The biggest obstacle to change is (amazingly) #Americansabroad as a group.
Because, @citizenshiptax affects different people very differently, it is hard to (1) define the problem (people understand it in how it affects them) and (2) willingness to actively campaign for change.
All #Americansabroad must come together to demand the severance of citizenship from @taxresidency.
Let's consider different groups and imagine how
@citizenshiptax affects members of those groups. Those with their financial center of gravity in the US might object to the compliance/filing requirements. But are not likely to experience the destructive affects of having a financial center of gravity outside the USA.
Least impacted: 1. Those who retired in the USA and moved abroad 2. Wealthy Americans who move abroad 3. Employed expats who are temporarily abroad.
Most impacted: 4. Emigrants living permanently abroad 5. Accidental Americans who file U.S. taxes
Could go either way: 6. Digital nomads (often use FEIE to avoid paying tax anywhere).
The key point is that because @citizenshiptax impacts people in different ways it is hard to get universal support for severing citizenship from @taxresidency.
Most people want their specific problem solved but are NOT supporters of completely ending the extra-territorial tax regime.
Principle 5 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
Starting in "Principle 1" I explained that the problem of the #doubletaxation of #Americansabroad exists in relation to non-US income sources received by individuals who do NOT live in the USA (AKA #Americansabroad.
Key point: If @USCitizenAbroad does NOT have non-US income sources and assets, the US @citizenshiptax will be experienced mostly as filing a US tax return while living outside the USA. From that perspective it's easy to see why non-resident US citizens with US income sources and assets are not hugely impacted by US #citizenshiptaxation.
Let's be a bit more precise. Imagine you have a @USCitizenAbroad with an investment portfolio of US stocks, US Social Security or a US pension. Even if taxed by the non-US country, the US generally has first right of taxation (it's US source income). US will NOT impose punitive taxation bc it's US source income. (The other country will generally provde a credit for US tax paid.
Now let's consider a @USCitizenAbroad with a non-US investment portfolio (possibly including non-US mutual funds), non-US pension, small business corp located outside the USA the situation is the opposite of having all US based assets. The non-US country has first right of taxation. The US will then impose very punitive taxation, reporting and penalties because it is "foreign income and assets". #PFIC, #GILTI, #Form5471, #Form8938, #Form8621, etc. - denial of foreign tax credits ...
Clearly US @citizenshiptax allows those WITH US asset
Second, the lost opportunity of not being able to participate in retirement and financial planning programs created by their country of actual residence:
Third, the horrible fees to tax preparers to prepare (often incorrectly) US tax returns. It is obvious that compliance costs should be considered a separate tax on UScitizenship.
Fourth, the inability to have access to normal banking, brokerage and investment accounts. US Treasury denies this is happening. But, I have people all over the world #renounceuscitizenship in order to free them from this US @citizenshiptax imposed disability.
Fifth, who in their right mind would engage in business opportunities with a U.S. citizen partner. Would you want to have your banking info reported to the IRS
Principle 3 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
Because @doubletaxation of #Americansabroad is caused by US @citizenshiptax it is clear that ending the #doubletaxation of @USCitizenAbroad can be ended by ending #CBT - AKA separation citizenship from @taxresidency. This is the ONLY solution that solves the problems of all people, all the time and under all circumstances.
That said, other solutions have also been proposed.
These other solutions which RETAIN US #citizenshiptaxation and solve the problems of some but all include ...
-
Proposals that RETAIN US @citizenshiptax but provide relieving provisions for some of the effects of #CBT for some people but not for others. Examples include:
- the 2018 Holding Bill and the later Beyer bills which mostly exclude most non-US source income from US taxation but are aimed at limited forms of income and leave ALL reporting requirements in place (Form 5471, Form 8938, Form 3520, Form 3520A, Form 8621, FinCEN 114, etc.)
Note that although these might enddouble taxaion they are limitedin scope.
It's important to note that #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad ...
- by severing US citizenship from @taxresidency ends all the compliance costs of being a @USCitizenAbroad
- by RETAINING US @citizenshiptax, but creating a "carve out" for foreign income means that the compliance cost, reporting obligations and opportunity cost (restrictions on investing/financial planning) likely continue.