Arsenal are seemingly interested in Lucas Paqueta, with links popping up from increasingly credible sources each day. So what's this guy's deal, and what would he bring to Arsenal? Let's run down some facts on him (1/x)...
First thing: I'm firmly in the bag for Paqueta and have been for some time. So, you know, keep that in mind. I'll try to be unflinchingly honest, though.
One of the first things you'll hear anyone talk about with Paqueta is his position. Is he a winger? midfielder? 10? false nine? The easiest answer is "yes," as he's played all over the place. Going back to his teenage breakout season in Brazil, though, he was a left CM.
That season, Paqueta scored 10 goals in 31 starts, helping Flamengo to second in the Brasileirão. He grabbed two assists in 7 Copa Libertadores games as well. Although Flamengo nominally played a 4-1-4-1, Flamengo's map shows he wasn't all about attack only.
Paqueta moved to Italy in January 2019, with AC Milan forking over £34.5m for the youngster, one of the top fees paid for a Brazilian talent. The Milan stint wasn't great. Paqueta played less than 2,000 minutes in two seasons, picking up only 3 goal involvements in 24 lg starts.
The pressure got to Paqueta, who later said he felt alone and let himself get overwhelmed. He found himself losing minutes to Franck Kessie and Ismael Bennacer, and also struggled to adapt as Milan moved from Gennaro Gattuso's 4-3-3, where he was an 8, to Stefano Pioli's system.
Milan moved Paqueta on to Lyon for £18m, and the Brazilian quickly imposed himself. He played primarily right 8 in Rudi Garcia's 4-3-3 his first season, racking up 14 goal involvements out of a midfield that included his friend and fellow Brazilian, Bruno Guimaraes.
Here's a chart of Paqueta's performance that season. Among his other accomplishments, it's noteworthy that whoscored ranked him their 13th-best player leaguewide that season, which saw Lyon finish fourth.
Last summer, Lyon hired Peter Bosz as manager, and a lot changed. Bosz preferred a 4-2-3-1, which primarily meant Paqueta taking on the most advanced CAM/10 role. Guimaraes and Caqueret were frequent CM starters. Paqueta again thrived, earned 15 goal involvements in 32 starts.
Here's his chart. It's noteworthy that Paqueta was strong in buildup even when not getting a goal or assist, as well as being one of the club's primarily ball progressors and its best presser, leading the line usually from the front.
One thing that makes me feel good about Paqueta playing box to box: Even despite being named as a 10 this past season, Paqueta's defensive numbers compare really favorably even to your standard midfielder. That's atypical of a 10 in my experience.
Regardless of his position at the club level, Paqueta has pretty much been a midfield mainstay for Brazil, possibly the best national team in the world. he's now up to 33 caps at just 24. Below is his heatmap in 2021 WC qualifying, as you can see very typical of a left 8.
So what would Paqueta bring to Arsenal? Versatility for sure. While he would likely sign to be a regular starter in central midfield, Paqueta has been a regular feature at 10, wing and false 9 at his various stops, meaning he'd be a capable fill-in in more area than one.
Paqueta, like Arsenal's other left 8 targets, is a better final-third passer than Arsenal's current midfielders. His 0.18 career xA would have placed him third among Arsenal regulars last season, well above Xhaka (0.09) or Partey (0.06).
He's also a much better taking on a man than Arsenal's current midfield. His career-low 1.19 dribbles per 90 (with 56.6% successful) would again put him right among Arsenal's best. Partey averaged 1.29 last season. For the record, Paqueta is just short of 2 dribbles, 63.3% career
Potential issues, other than the price: Statistically speaking, he is prone to turnovers. Paqueta's career turnovers per touch is high compared to someone like Youri Tielemans or Granit Xhaka. But he's more direct. Is it a feature of his Brazilian style, or a bug? Pros and cons
Would Paqueta work for an Arsenal, or is he the wrong player at the wrong time? I don't love his reported price, and OL are a pain, but I do love the player. He's smart, he's active, and perhaps, with Brazilians all around him, he'd feel at home at the carpet. Time will tell.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Only a handful of games separate Arsenal from the World Cup, and all of us from spending six weeks guessing what kind of reinforcements Arsenal might bring in. Who's looking especially good out there these days? Let's take a look (thread)
Before we get started, my customary disclaimer: This thread has been carefully compiled based only on statistical performance, as tracked by the parties named below. I always recommend a healthy dose of the eye test to balance stats. I'll try to add context I'm aware of.
Now, methodology: This thread explores potential depth/future starters at Arsenal's defensive midfield position, currently occupied by Thomas Partey, and also known as the No. 6 role. THESE PLAYERS ARE NOT ALL 6s RIGHT NOW, but their statistics provide hope they could be.
Pedro Neto could be Arsenal's myster winger! What would the young Portuguese international bring to the carpet? Let's take a look below (1/x)...
Neto came through the Braga system in Portugal. He made his senior debut at just 16, but ended up playing only about an hour of senior football for his first club, which included a goal.
Neto was loaned to Lazio for two seasons (and then purchased by Lazio), but he again figured very little in the senior club, making five appearances totaling 60 minutes.
The transfer window is dead! Long live the transfer window! With dreams of Raphinha seemingly gone, whom else could Arsenal target? I analyzed the numbers of 44 big-five-leagues wide players, and I'm gonna shoot 'em at ya rapid-fire.
My disclaimer: This is 100% based on stats. I'm a proponent of the eye test and recommend you watch (full games, not comps) these guys before forming your opinions.
My criteria: High output, great ball control, creativity. Weighted for league and age. Ideal=25 +PL experienced.
Because Raphinha was the target, I tailored my formula to elevate him in the rankings, meaning similar profiles would rise as well. I'm also going with all tier-one career numbers to weed out inconsistent performers.
If Arsenal lose out on Raphinha, which kind of seems like it's happening, it would be tough to replicate the day-one impact. That said, here are some names to consider from my March thread on the position:
Season's over. Arsenal's kids ended up fifth in the Premier League, securing a Europa League return and setting up for a key summer. Looking around the squad, how did everyone (except CBs and GKs) do in individual stats? A thread... (1/x)
Starting at striker, Alexandre Lacazette put in some real shifts this season, but his legs betrayed him around the three-quarter pole. Even at his best, Laca was missing an important skill: scoring, ending up with his worst finishing performance in London. Verdict: Let him walk.
Laca was replaced late on by Eddie Nketiah, who ignited debate with a series of strong performances that helped pull the Gunners out of a slump. This is small sample size territory, but Eddie did a good poacher's work. Not the complete striker but a good option for second chair.