Sarah Posner Profile picture
Jul 12 46 tweets 5 min read
Rep. Stephanie Murphy setting up how everything after Dec. 14--after Electoral College was decided, after multiple courts rejected Trump's challenges--Trump et al persisted in attacking election results. She shows video of Mitch McConnell congratulating President-elect on 12/15.
In depo testimony, Eugene Scalia, who was Trump's Labor Secretary, recounts how he told Trump he should concede.
Cipollone agreed there was no evidence of fraud sufficient to overturn election. We see Cipollone for the first time in his under videotaped testimony right now. #January6thCommitteeHearings
People around Trump all agreed 12/14 was the date after which Trump's claim was bogus. Including Bill Barr.
Cipollone told Committee that Meadows told him that Trump would gracefully concede at some point. "It wasn't a one-time statement," says Cipollone. #January6thCommitteeHearings
Kayleigh McEnany told committee she began to "plan for life after the administration" after that point.
Judd Deere told committee that he told Trump that Electoral College had met "and I believed at that point that the means for him to pursue litigation was probably closed.... He disagreed."
Cipollone agreed with Barr that the stolen election / election fraud claims were baseless.
Barr rebuffed Trump on seizing voting machines.

But then, 12/18 -- the infamous meeting with Sidney Powell.
A draft executive order would have ordered DoD to seize voting machines, and Trump would appoint a special counsel--Sidney Powell-- with power to seize machine, and charge people with crimes.
Cipollone: "I was vehemently opposed. I didn't think she should be appointed to anything."
Cipollone, on the plan to seize voting machines: "that's not how we do things in the United States."
Raskin points out that Meadows thought Trump should concede around 12/14 but then worked to promote the false claims of voter fraud. Hutchinson said Meadows then began to explore claims connected to John Eastman's theories.
The 12/18 meeting lasted six hours! Six participants and other staffers who could hear the screaming talked to the Committee.
"the Overstock person"
Drinking a can of Dr. Pepper, Powell told the Committee that Trump was very receptive to her conspiracy theories.
Mike Flynn pled the Fifth when asked by the Committee about Powell feeding Trump conspiracy theories about voting machines and Venezuela, Iran, and China.
Herschmann: "the screaming was completely, completely out there... what they were proposing was nuts"
Giuliani told Committee he told them they were a bunch of "pussies" (this was before a tap on the back nearly knocked him over on Staten Island)
During the meeting, Hutchinson texted Ornato, telling him the West Wing was "unhinged"
"At 1:42 a.m.... shortly after the last participants left the unhinged meeting... Trump repeated his Big Lie... before calling for a 'big protest in D.C.... be there, will be wild. Trump supporters responded immediately," says Raskin.
The next day, Ali Alexander registered wildprotest.com, including details on rally times, transportation, etc.

Then others like Alex Jones started promoting it. "President Trump... wants the American people to march on Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6"
Wow, this compilation of far-right media personalities amping up people coming to come to Jan. 6 armed and violent is absolutely chilling.
My God, Twitter contemplated greater content moderation after Trump's Sept 2020 "stand back and stand by" comment to the Proud Boys during the presidential, but didn't do it.
A former employee told the Committee that Twitter actually relished being Trump's favorite social media platform.

Any other user would have been kept off the platform well before Trump was kicked off, says the employee.
This was esp clear after Trump's 12/19 tweet. A lot of violent tweets were in response to Trump's tweet. Responses like "I'm locked and loaded and ready for civil war." Trump's tweet was "essentially staking a flag in DC " said employee, who was concerned it would become violent.
Founder of thedonald dot win told Committee that the 12/19 Trump tweet galvanized users of his racist site to come to DC on Jan. 6. On the site, users shared plans and violent threats, specifying weaponry they would use, and encouraging people to join Proud Boys.
Trump continued to rile up his followers in tweets in the period between 12/19 and 1/6.
That's Eric Metals standing behind Stewart Rhodes in the clip Raskin is playing of Rhodes calling for martial law. It's from the Jericho March on the Mall 12/12/20.
(Stone and Flynn and Ali Alexander were there too--people who Raskin is outlining were working together for Jan. 6)
Eric Metaxas, not Metals.
Committee now playing clips of Bannon's podcast from 1/5. Before and after the podcast, Bannon had spoken on the phone with Trump.
Based on testimony from several WH staffers, on 1/5, music and crowd were audible from Freedom Plaza at the WH, and Trump was, in the words of Sarah Matthews, "in a very good mood." Now committee plays clips of what was happening at that rally.
Stone cast it as a battle between good and evil; Flynn "this is soil we have fought for."
Ali Alexander: "1776 is always an option. These degenerates in the deep state are going to give us what we want or we are going to shut it down"
Trump tweeted on 1/5: "we hear you and love you from the Oval Office"
More on Twitter doing nothing: the former employee said they sent a Slack message, "when people are shooting each other tomorrow, I will try to rest in the knowledge that I tried" to make Twitter do something before 1/6.
The former Twitter employee had begged for an intervention, lest "people are going to die." On 1/5 they realized no intervention was coming from Twitter.
Even Debbie Lesko of AZ, who voted against certifying, warned that Trump supporters were "going to go nuts" on Jan. 6 when Congress certified the election.
After talking to Stephen Miller, Trump added a line in his speech about Pence: "we will see whether MikePence enters history as a great and courageous leader"
Speechwriters removed the line about Pence. After that, Pence and Trump talked by phone, with Trump calling Pence a "wimp and other derogatory words," says Murphy. Then speechwriters were instructed to "reinsert the Pence lines."
Put this together with previous testimony from Hutchinson--that Trump knew his crowd was armed and they weren't going to hurt *him*--and he insisted on putting the Pence line back in, and saying it.
Trump then added EIGHT off script references to Pence, says Murphy.
IDK about Parscale's crocodile tears.
Raskin: "American carnage: Donald Trump's true legacy."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Posner

Sarah Posner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sarahposner

Jul 12
This discussion between @ThePlumLineGS and @RachelKleinfeld gets to the heart of what imperils democracies around the world, including ours: that white Christian patriarchy is very appealing to a lot of people.
@ThePlumLineGS @RachelKleinfeld Important to understand here that Trump did not appear and become appealing to a white Christian nationalist base in the U.S. out of nowhere. As I've reported elsewhere, there was deliberate engagement with strongmen like Orban as a model by U.S. Christian right.
@ThePlumLineGS @RachelKleinfeld (Well before CPAC's more recent embrace of Orban and Orbanism.)
Read 6 tweets
Jul 12
Very useful rundown from @AaronBlake:

Analysis | The dispute between Trump’s and Bannon’s legal teams washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
What's becoming clear here is that Trump paraded around the idea of executive privilege, vaguely, and when it suited him.
His lawyer told first told Bannon's lawyer they were invoking the privilege, but wasn't specific or helpful when it came to actually asserting it before the Committee.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 9
She just hugged the oligarch and Chris Fowler said, “he’s the head of the Tennis Federation” and that was it #Wimbledon2022
How can I combine my love of tennis and loathing of political corruption.
Earlier this year a Labour MP “called out businessman Bulat Utemuratov over his role in the Nazarbayev regime as his former chief of staff. Utemuratov made his fortune in 2007 when Italian bank UniCredit purchased 92% of Kazakhstan's ATF Bank for $2.1 billion.”
Read 5 tweets
Jul 7
I know there's a lot of attention on this story, but if you think this is the *only* deep connection the Supreme Court justices have with Christian right legal organizations that have business before the Court, you have not been paying attention.
For example, as I reported -- for Rolling Stone! -- two years ago, Amy Coney Barrett has served on the faculty of Alliance Defending Freedom's fellowship program for law students. ADF has cases (and not just amicus briefs!) before the Court all the time.

rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
I get the shock value of these activists praying with SCOTUS justices inside the Court. (If it happened; that's unclear.) But agreeing to comply with the "lexicon," and therefore buying into (or appearing to buy into) an organization's entire worldview is far more problematic.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 7
There's an anecdote in @milbank's column this morning, on the spate of stories on Dem dissatisfaction with Biden, that I had forgotten about.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
And it's just absolutely astonishing that the media, and a high-ranking member of Biden's own party, scolded him for this comment. Oh, the pearl-clutching!
Remember when Trump would say something outrageous every day?!? And the press found it delicious to cover, but usually not to scold. And certainly no Republicans--then or now, with vanishingly small exceptions--scolded Trump. And he was therefore covered as a strong leader.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 6
These Pew numbers on approval/disapproval of Dobbs tell a story: our public policy is increasingly dictated by the views of white evangelicals:

pewresearch.org/politics/2022/…
A slim majority of Catholics disapprove of the Dobbs decision. A majority of the Supreme Court is Catholic, including 5/6 of the 6 justices who signed on to the majority opinion.

They are not representative of the views of their co-religionists, or all Americans.
There aren't any white evangelicals on the Supreme Court, yet their views are more strongly represented there than any other religious view; the Court's Catholics are not as evenly split as America's Catholics; the Court tilts much further right.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(